Machina Ex Machina Artificially Intelligent Systems as Inventors under Polish Legal Framework
By: Aleksandra Bar
References
- Abbott Ryan, ‘Everything is Obvious’ (2019) 66 UCLA Law Review
- Abbott Ryan, ‘I Think, therefore I Invent: Creative Computers and the Future of Patent Law’ (2016) 57 Boston College Law Review
- Abbott Ryan, ‘Patenting the Output of Autonomously Inventive Machines’ (2017) 10 No. 1 Landslide
- Bottalico Barbara, ‘Cognitive Neuroscience, Decision Making and the Law’ (2011) 2 European Journal of Risk Regulation
- Bridy Annemarie, ‘Coding Creativity: Copyright and the Artificially Intelligent Author’ (2012) Stanford Technology Law Review
- Bringsjord Selmer, ‘Chess is Too Easy’ (1998) 101/2 Technology Review
- Buyers John, Artificial Intelligence. The Practical Legal Issues (Law Brief Publishing 2018).
- Clifford Ralpf D., ‘Intellectual Property in the Era of the Creative Computer Program: Will the True Creator Please Stand Up?’ (1997) 71 Tulane Law Review
- Coase Ronald H., ‘The Nature of the Firm’ (1937) 4 Economica
- Cohen Aaron M., ‘Stephen Thaler's Imagination Machines’ (July–August 2009) 43(4) The Futurist 28 <
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299169623_Stephen_Thaler's_Imagination_Machines > accessed 10 September 2019. - Cope David, Computer Models of Musical Creativity (MIT Press 2005)
- David Levy, Robots Unlimited: Life in a Virtual Age (CRC Press 2005)
- de Cock Buning Madeleine, ‘Autonomous Intelligent Systems as Creative Agents under the EU Framework for Intellectual Property’ (2016) 7 European Journal of Risk Regulation
- Denicola Robert C., ‘Ex Machina: Copyright Protection for Computer-Generated Works’ (2016) 69 Rutgers University Law Review
- Dorotheou Emily, ‘Reap the Benefits and Avoid the Legal Uncertainty: Who Owns the Creations of Artificial Intelligence?’ (2015) 21(4) Computer and Telecommunications Law Review
- Drahos Peter, A Philosophy of Intellectual Property Rights (Routledge 1996)
- du Vall Michał ‘Podmioty i prawa podmiotowe’ in Elżbieta. Traple (ed), Prawo Patentowe (2nd edn, Wolters Kluwer Polska 2017)
- Feldman Robin C., ‘Artificial Intelligence’ (2018) 21 Green Bag 2d
- Fisher William, ‘Theories of Intellectual Property’ in Stephen Munzer (ed), New Essays in the Legal and Political Theory of Property (Cambridge University Press 2001)
- Flint David, ‘Intelligence: The Artificial Way’ (2020) 41 Business Law Review
- Franzoni Luigi Alberto and Kaushik Arun Kumar, ‘The Optimal Scope of Trade Secrets Law’ (2016) 45 International Review of Law and Economics
- Grounds for the EPO decision of 27 January 2020 on EP 18 275 163
- Grounds for the EPO decision of 27 January 2020 on EP 18 275 174
- Kassan Peter, ‘AI Gone Awry: The Futile Quest for Artificial Intelligence’ (2006) 12 Skeptic Kohlhepp Peter M., ‘When the Invention is an Inventor: Revitalizing Patentable Subject Matter to Exclude Unpredictable Processes’ (2008) 93 Minnesota Law Review
- Kohlhepp Peter M., ‘When the Invention is an Inventor: Revitalizing Patentable Subject Matter to Exclude Unpredictable Processes’ (2008) 93 Minnesota Law Review
- Kostański Piotr, ‘Tytuł I. Przepisy ogólne. Art. 3’ in Piotr Kostański (ed), Prawo własności przemysłowej. Komentarz (2 nd edn, CH Beck 2014)
- Markiewicz Ryszard, ‘Sztuczna inteligencja i własność intelektualna’ in Alicja Adamczak (ed), 100 lat ochrony własności przemysłowej w Polsce. Księga jubileuszowa Urzędu Patentowego Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej (Wolters Kluwer 2018)
- Markiewicz Ryszard, Ochrona prac naukowych (Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe 1990)
- Newell Allen, ‘Response: The Models Are Broken, The Models Are Broken!’ (1986) 47 University of Pittsburgh Law Review
- Preussner-Zamorska Janina, ‘Autorstwo projektu wynalazczego’ in Stafan Grzybowski and Andrzej Kopff (eds), Prawo Wynalazcze. Zagadnienia Wybrane (Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe 1978)
- Preussner-Zamorska Janina, ‘Prawo do autorstwa wynalazku’ (1974) 2 Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
- Promińska Urszula, ‘Zagadnienia podmiotowe’ in Ewa Nowińska and Krystyna Szczepanowska-Kozłowska (eds), System Prawa Handlowego, T. 3, Prawo własności przemysłowej (CH Beck 2015)
- Samuelson Pamela, ‘Allocating Ownership Rights in Computer-Generated Works’ (1986) 47 University of Pittsburgh Law Review
- Schank Roger and Owens Christopher, ‘The Mechanics of Creativity’ in Raymond Kurzweil (ed), The Age of Intelligent Machines (MIT Press 1990)
- Scherer Matthew U., ‘Regulating Artificial Intelligent Systems: Risks, Challenges, Competencies, and Strategies’ (2016) 29 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology
- Schuster W. Michael, ‘Artificial Intelligence and Patent Ownership’ (2018) 75 Washington and Lee Law Review
- Sołtysiński Stanisław, Prawo Wynalazcze. Komentarz (Instytut Wydawniczy Centralnej Rady Związków Zawodowych 1975)
- Staszków Michał, Prawo wynalazcze (Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe 1989)
- Stierle Martin, Artificial Intelligence Designated as Inventor – An Analysis of the Recent EPO Case Law (2020) 69(9) GRUR International
- Szajkowski Andrzej, Wynalazki wspólne. Aspekty prawne (Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich 1982)
- Szczepanowska-Kozłowska Krystyna, ‘Zagadnienia Podmiotowe’ in Ewa Nowińska, Urszula Promińska and Krystyna Szczepanowska-Kozłowska (eds), Własność przemysłowa i jej ochrona (Lexis Nexis 2014)
- Szczotka Jerzy, ‘Tytuł I. Przepisy ogólne. Art. 3’ in Tomasz Demendecki and others (eds), Prawo własności przemysłowej. Komentarz (Wolters Kluwer Polska 2015)
- Szczotka Jerzy, ‘Tytuł I. Przepisy ogólne. Art. 8’ in Tomasz Demendecki and others (eds), Prawo własności przemysłowej. Komentarz (Wolters Kluwer Polska 2015)
- Szwaja Janusz and Kubiak-Cyrul Agnieszka, ‘Twórcy projektów wynalazczych’ in Ryszard Skubisz (ed), System Prawa Prywatnego, T. 14A, Prawo własności przemysłowej (CH Beck 2017)
- UK IPO patent decision BL O/741/19 of 4 December 2019, <
https://www.ipo.gov.uk/p-challenge-decision-results/p-challenge-decision-results-bl?BL_Number=O/741/19 > accessed 1 October 2020 - USPTO decision of 22 April 2020 on Application No. 16/524,350, <
https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/16524350_22apr2020.pdf > accessed 1 October 2020 - Vertinsky Liza and Rice Todd M., ‘Thinking about Thinking Machines: Implications of Machine Inventors for Patent Law’ (2002) 8 Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law
- William M. Landes and Richard A. Posner, The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law (Belknap Press 2003)
- WIPO, Revised Issues Paper on Intellectual Property Policy and Artificial Intelligence (WIPO/IP/AI/2/GE/20/1 REV.) 21 May 2020 <
https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/mdocs/en/wipo_ip_ai_2_ge_20/wipo_ip_ai_2_ge_20_1_rev.pdf > accessed 1 October 2020. - Yanisky-Ravid Shlomit and Liu Xiaoqiong (Jackie), ‘When Artificial Intelligence Systems Produce Inventions: An Alternative Model for Patent Law at the 3A Era’ (2018) 39 Cardozo Law Review
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/wrlae-2020-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2084-1264
Language: English
Page range: 17 - 35
Published on: Jun 19, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2021 Aleksandra Bar, published by University of Wroclaw, Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.