Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Machina Ex Machina Artificially Intelligent Systems as Inventors under Polish Legal Framework Cover

Machina Ex Machina Artificially Intelligent Systems as Inventors under Polish Legal Framework

By: Aleksandra Bar  
Open Access
|Jun 2021

References

  1. Abbott Ryan, ‘Everything is Obvious’ (2019) 66 UCLA Law Review
  2. Abbott Ryan, ‘I Think, therefore I Invent: Creative Computers and the Future of Patent Law’ (2016) 57 Boston College Law Review
  3. Abbott Ryan, ‘Patenting the Output of Autonomously Inventive Machines’ (2017) 10 No. 1 Landslide
  4. Bottalico Barbara, ‘Cognitive Neuroscience, Decision Making and the Law’ (2011) 2 European Journal of Risk Regulation
  5. Bridy Annemarie, ‘Coding Creativity: Copyright and the Artificially Intelligent Author’ (2012) Stanford Technology Law Review
  6. Bringsjord Selmer, ‘Chess is Too Easy’ (1998) 101/2 Technology Review
  7. Buyers John, Artificial Intelligence. The Practical Legal Issues (Law Brief Publishing 2018).
  8. Clifford Ralpf D., ‘Intellectual Property in the Era of the Creative Computer Program: Will the True Creator Please Stand Up?’ (1997) 71 Tulane Law Review
  9. Coase Ronald H., ‘The Nature of the Firm’ (1937) 4 Economica
  10. Cohen Aaron M., ‘Stephen Thaler's Imagination Machines’ (July–August 2009) 43(4) The Futurist 28 accessed 10 September 2019.
  11. Cope David, Computer Models of Musical Creativity (MIT Press 2005)
  12. David Levy, Robots Unlimited: Life in a Virtual Age (CRC Press 2005)
  13. de Cock Buning Madeleine, ‘Autonomous Intelligent Systems as Creative Agents under the EU Framework for Intellectual Property’ (2016) 7 European Journal of Risk Regulation
  14. Denicola Robert C., ‘Ex Machina: Copyright Protection for Computer-Generated Works’ (2016) 69 Rutgers University Law Review
  15. Dorotheou Emily, ‘Reap the Benefits and Avoid the Legal Uncertainty: Who Owns the Creations of Artificial Intelligence?’ (2015) 21(4) Computer and Telecommunications Law Review
  16. Drahos Peter, A Philosophy of Intellectual Property Rights (Routledge 1996)
  17. du Vall Michał ‘Podmioty i prawa podmiotowe’ in Elżbieta. Traple (ed), Prawo Patentowe (2nd edn, Wolters Kluwer Polska 2017)
  18. Feldman Robin C., ‘Artificial Intelligence’ (2018) 21 Green Bag 2d
  19. Fisher William, ‘Theories of Intellectual Property’ in Stephen Munzer (ed), New Essays in the Legal and Political Theory of Property (Cambridge University Press 2001)
  20. Flint David, ‘Intelligence: The Artificial Way’ (2020) 41 Business Law Review
  21. Franzoni Luigi Alberto and Kaushik Arun Kumar, ‘The Optimal Scope of Trade Secrets Law’ (2016) 45 International Review of Law and Economics
  22. Grounds for the EPO decision of 27 January 2020 on EP 18 275 163
  23. Grounds for the EPO decision of 27 January 2020 on EP 18 275 174
  24. Kassan Peter, ‘AI Gone Awry: The Futile Quest for Artificial Intelligence’ (2006) 12 Skeptic Kohlhepp Peter M., ‘When the Invention is an Inventor: Revitalizing Patentable Subject Matter to Exclude Unpredictable Processes’ (2008) 93 Minnesota Law Review
  25. Kohlhepp Peter M., ‘When the Invention is an Inventor: Revitalizing Patentable Subject Matter to Exclude Unpredictable Processes’ (2008) 93 Minnesota Law Review
  26. Kostański Piotr, ‘Tytuł I. Przepisy ogólne. Art. 3’ in Piotr Kostański (ed), Prawo własności przemysłowej. Komentarz (2 nd edn, CH Beck 2014)
  27. Markiewicz Ryszard, ‘Sztuczna inteligencja i własność intelektualna’ in Alicja Adamczak (ed), 100 lat ochrony własności przemysłowej w Polsce. Księga jubileuszowa Urzędu Patentowego Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej (Wolters Kluwer 2018)
  28. Markiewicz Ryszard, Ochrona prac naukowych (Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe 1990)
  29. Newell Allen, ‘Response: The Models Are Broken, The Models Are Broken!’ (1986) 47 University of Pittsburgh Law Review
  30. Preussner-Zamorska Janina, ‘Autorstwo projektu wynalazczego’ in Stafan Grzybowski and Andrzej Kopff (eds), Prawo Wynalazcze. Zagadnienia Wybrane (Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe 1978)
  31. Preussner-Zamorska Janina, ‘Prawo do autorstwa wynalazku’ (1974) 2 Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
  32. Promińska Urszula, ‘Zagadnienia podmiotowe’ in Ewa Nowińska and Krystyna Szczepanowska-Kozłowska (eds), System Prawa Handlowego, T. 3, Prawo własności przemysłowej (CH Beck 2015)
  33. Samuelson Pamela, ‘Allocating Ownership Rights in Computer-Generated Works’ (1986) 47 University of Pittsburgh Law Review
  34. Schank Roger and Owens Christopher, ‘The Mechanics of Creativity’ in Raymond Kurzweil (ed), The Age of Intelligent Machines (MIT Press 1990)
  35. Scherer Matthew U., ‘Regulating Artificial Intelligent Systems: Risks, Challenges, Competencies, and Strategies’ (2016) 29 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology
  36. Schuster W. Michael, ‘Artificial Intelligence and Patent Ownership’ (2018) 75 Washington and Lee Law Review
  37. Sołtysiński Stanisław, Prawo Wynalazcze. Komentarz (Instytut Wydawniczy Centralnej Rady Związków Zawodowych 1975)
  38. Staszków Michał, Prawo wynalazcze (Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe 1989)
  39. Stierle Martin, Artificial Intelligence Designated as Inventor – An Analysis of the Recent EPO Case Law (2020) 69(9) GRUR International
  40. Szajkowski Andrzej, Wynalazki wspólne. Aspekty prawne (Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich 1982)
  41. Szczepanowska-Kozłowska Krystyna, ‘Zagadnienia Podmiotowe’ in Ewa Nowińska, Urszula Promińska and Krystyna Szczepanowska-Kozłowska (eds), Własność przemysłowa i jej ochrona (Lexis Nexis 2014)
  42. Szczotka Jerzy, ‘Tytuł I. Przepisy ogólne. Art. 3’ in Tomasz Demendecki and others (eds), Prawo własności przemysłowej. Komentarz (Wolters Kluwer Polska 2015)
  43. Szczotka Jerzy, ‘Tytuł I. Przepisy ogólne. Art. 8’ in Tomasz Demendecki and others (eds), Prawo własności przemysłowej. Komentarz (Wolters Kluwer Polska 2015)
  44. Szwaja Janusz and Kubiak-Cyrul Agnieszka, ‘Twórcy projektów wynalazczych’ in Ryszard Skubisz (ed), System Prawa Prywatnego, T. 14A, Prawo własności przemysłowej (CH Beck 2017)
  45. UK IPO patent decision BL O/741/19 of 4 December 2019, accessed 1 October 2020
  46. USPTO decision of 22 April 2020 on Application No. 16/524,350, accessed 1 October 2020
  47. Vertinsky Liza and Rice Todd M., ‘Thinking about Thinking Machines: Implications of Machine Inventors for Patent Law’ (2002) 8 Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law
  48. William M. Landes and Richard A. Posner, The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law (Belknap Press 2003)
  49. WIPO, Revised Issues Paper on Intellectual Property Policy and Artificial Intelligence (WIPO/IP/AI/2/GE/20/1 REV.) 21 May 2020 accessed 1 October 2020.
  50. Yanisky-Ravid Shlomit and Liu Xiaoqiong (Jackie), ‘When Artificial Intelligence Systems Produce Inventions: An Alternative Model for Patent Law at the 3A Era’ (2018) 39 Cardozo Law Review
Language: English
Page range: 17 - 35
Published on: Jun 19, 2021
Published by: University of Wroclaw, Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2021 Aleksandra Bar, published by University of Wroclaw, Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.