Abstract
To what extent can the growing popularity of populist parties be explained by economic causes? Important factors include perceived inequality and fears of social decline. From a subjective perspective, both the general and individual economic situation are often perceived as worse than objective indicators suggest. Populist parties amplify individual fears, emotionalise debates and question scientific research. Economic policy can counter these dynamics by mitigating the effects of structural change and strengthening development prospects for disadvantaged occupational groups and regions. Economics can contribute to de-polarizing political debates by clearly communicating the consequences of economic processes and policy measures, thereby helping to distinguish facts from opinion.