References
- Barry, B. (2022). Green Defence: The defence and military implications of climate change for Europe. The International Institute for Strategic Studies.
- Bayer, S., Puglierin, J. & Wolff, G. (2022). Sicherheitspolitische Handlungsempfehlungen für die Neukartierung der Energiepolitik. Impulspapier der Initiative Klimaneutrales Deutschland.
- Bayer, S. & Zerey, C. (2025). Nachhaltigkeit als Voraussetzung für die Einsatzfähigkeit der Bundeswehr. Wirtschaftsdienst, 105(4), 249–54.
- Blakemoore, R. & Nurkin, T. (2022). Power Projection: Accelerating the Electrification of US Military Ground Vehicles. Atlantic Council.
- BMVg – Bundesministerium der Verteidigung. (2022). Nachhaltigkeitsbericht 2022 des Bundesministeriums der Verteidigung und der Bundes-wehr.
- Bundesregierung. (2024, 4. April). Antwort der Bundesregierung auf die Kleine Anfrage „Die Aufrüstung Deutschlands im Rahmen der NATO und der ökologische Fußabdruck der Bundeswehr“. Drucksache 20/10928.
- Crawford, N. C. (2019). Pentagon Fuel Use, Climate Change, and the Costs of War. Working Paper Watson Institute, Brown University.
- Crawford, N. C. (2022). The Pentagon, Climate Change, and War: Charting the Rise and Fall of U.S. Military Emissions. MIT Press.
- De Klerk, L., Shlapak, M., Zibtsev, S., Myroniuk, V., Soshenskyi, O., Vasylyshyn, R., Krakovska, S. & Kryshtop, L. (2025). Climate damage caused by Russia’s war in Ukraine. Initiative on GHG Accounting of War.
- Depledge, D. (2023). Low-carbon warfare: Climate change, net zero and military operations. International Affairs, 99(2), 667–685.
- Europäische Kommission. (2024). A European Steel and Metals Action Plan [Communication].
- Fetzek, S. (2023). Carbon Emissions, Net Zero and Future Forces – Comparative Analysis of Radical Emissions-reductions Plans and Processes for Defence. The International Institute for Strategic Studies.
- Hermann, B. (2022, 20. Januar). An issue „the Pentagon cared most about“: Behind the U.S. push for national security exemptions in Kyoto. National Security Archive.
- IATA – International Air Transport Association. (2024, 10. Dezember). Disappointingly Slow Growth in SAF Production [Pressemeldung].
- Jankowski, D. P. & Wieczorkiewicz, J. (2023, 23. März). Energy transition: How NATO can get it right. Britains’s World.
- John, M. (2021, 2. November). NATO chief: Armies must keep pace with global climate efforts. Reuters.
- Katalenich, S. M. & Jacobson, M. Z. (2022). Toward battery electric and hydrogen fuel cell military vehicles for land, air, and sea. Energy, 254, 124355.
- Luhmann, H.-J. (2021). Vom Leopard zum E-Opard: Die Bundeswehr sollte bei der Klimaneutralität vorangehen. BAKS-Arbeitspapiere, 5/21.
- Luhmann, H.-J. (2022, 4. November). Klimaneutrale Streitkräfte? Internationale Politik.
- Malo, S. (2023, 9. September). There’s a Battle Over Carbon Emerging from the War in Ukraine. Politico.
- MEG – Military Emissions Gap. (2024). Military Emissions Gap.
- Neimark, B., Otu-Larbi, F., Bigger, P., Cottrell, L. & Larbi, R. (2024). A Multitemporal Snapshot of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Israel-Gaza Conflict. Working Paper.
- Nelsen, A. (2015, 14. Dezember). Pentagon to lose emissions exemption under Paris climate deal. The Guardian.
- Norwegische Regierung. (2025, 15. Januar). Norway operates F-35s on biofuel.
- Parkinson, S. & Cottrell, L. (2022). Estimating the Military’s Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Scientists for Global Responsibility & Conflict and Environment Observatory.
- Rajaeifar, M. A., Belcher, O., Parkinson, S., Neimark, B., Weir, D., Ash-worth, K., Larbi, R. & Heidrich, O. (2022). Decarbonize the military— Mandate emissions reporting. Nature, 611(7934), 29–32.
- Samaras, C., Nuttall, W. J. & Bazilian, M. (2019). Energy and the military: Convergence of security, economic, and environmental decision-making. Energy Strategy Reviews, 26, 100409.
- Schenuit, F., Böttcher, M. & Geden, O. (2023). „Carbon Management“: Chancen und Risiken für ambitionierte Klimapolitik. SWP-Aktuell, 30/2023.
- Schogol, J. (2022, 29. April). How the US military’s reliance on fossil fuels puts troops in danger. Task & Purpose.
- Shachtman, N. (2009, 11. November). Afghanistan‘s Oil Binge: 22 Gallons of Fuel Per Soldier Per Day. Wired.
- SIPRI – Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. (2024). Trends in World Military Expenditure, 2024.
- Stoltenberg, J. (2021, 2. November). Remarks at the high-level roundtable „Climate, Peace and Stability“ at COP26. NATO Website.
- Stott, M. (2025). Defence in a Climate-Changed World: Futureproofing its Licence to Operate. The RUSI Journal, 170(2), 46–56.
- Tagliapietra, S. (2025). Defence and climate: seven points for a common agenda. Bruegel.
- UK MoD – Ministry of Defence (2021). Climate Change and Sustainability Strategic Approach.
- UK MoD – Ministry of Defence (2023). Annual Report and Accounts 2022–23.
- UNFCCC – United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (1998, 25. März). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its third session, held at Kyoto, from 1 to 11 December 1997. Addendum. Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its third session.
- UNFCCC – United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (1999, 07. September). Report of the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice on its tenth session Bonn, 31 May – 11 June 1999. Addendum. Draft decision on guidelines for the preparation of national communications by Parties included in Annex I to the Convention. Part I: UNFCCC reporting guidelines on annual inventories.
- Vinke, K. (2025, 13. Februar). Strength Through Sustainability. Internationale Politik Quarterly.
Language: German
Page range: 665 - 670
Published on: Sep 23, 2025
Published by: ZBW – Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 12 issues per year
Related subjects:
© 2025 Ole Adolphsen, published by ZBW – Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.