References
- Bear Creek Mining Corporation v. Republic of Peru, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/2, Award (Nov 30, 2017)
- Eiser Infrastructure Limited and Energia Solar Luxembourg S.à.r.l v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/13/36, Award (May 4, 2017)
- Urbaser S.A. and Consorcio de Aguas Bilbao Bizkaia, Bilbao Biskaia Ur Partzuergoa v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/26, Award (Dec 8, 2016)
- Churchill Mining PLC and Planet Mining Pty Ltd v. Republic of Indonesia, ICSID Case No ARB/12/14 and 12/40, Award (Dec 6, 2016)
- Pac Rim Cayman LLC v. Republic of El Salvador, ICSID Case No ARB/09/12, Award (Oct 14, 2016)
- Eco Oro Minerals Corp. v. Republic of Colombia (ICSID Case No. ARB/16/41), 2016
- Burlington Resources Inc. v. Republic of Ecuador, ICSID Case No ARB/08/5, Decision on Liability (Dec 14, 2012); Interim Decision on Environmental Counterclaim (Aug 11, 2015)
- Bilcon of Delaware et al v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2009-04)
- Sempra Energy International v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/16, Award (Sep 28, 2007
- Sempra Energy Int’l v. Argentina [2007], ICSID Case No. ARB/02/16, Decision on the Argentine Republic’s Application for Annulment of the Award (June 29, 2010)
- Noble Ventures, Inc v. Romania [2005], ICSID Case No. ARB/01/11, Award (Oct 5, 2005)
- SGS Societe Generale de Surveillance S.A. v. Philippines, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/6, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction (Jan 29, 2004)
- Tokios Tokels v. Ukraine [2004], ICSID Case No. ARB/02/18 50, Decision on Jurisdiction (Apr 29, 2004)
- Siemens A.G. v. Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8, Decision on Jurisdiction (Aug 3, 2004)
- Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed, S.A. v. The United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/00/2 (2003)
- Anthony J., Simons P. and Mayeda G. (2012), ‘Integrating Sustainable Development into International Investment Agreements: A Guide for Developing Country Negotiators’, Paper prepared for the Commonwealth Secretariat
- Chi M. (2018), ‘Sustainable Development Provisions in Investment Treaties’, United Nations-Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific
- Chochorelou M. and Berdud C. E. (2018), ‘Sustainable Development in New Generation FTAs: Could Arbitrators Further the Principle through ISDS?’, 27 Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law
- Cuyvers L. (August 2014), ‘The Sustainable Development Clauses in Free Trade Agreements of the EU with Asian Countries: Perspectives for ASEAN?’, ResearchGate. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264696827_The_Sustainable_Development_Clauses_in_Free_Trade_Agreements_of_the_EU_with_Asian_Countries_Perspectives_for_ASEAN [accessed 25 April 2019]
- Dolzer R. and Schreuer C. (2012), Principles of International Investment Law (2nd ed.), Oxford University Press
- Emily Hush (2018), ‘Where No Man Has Gone before: The Future of Sustainable Development in the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement and New Generation Free Trade Agreements Student Notes’, Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 93
- EU (14 July 2016), ‘Text of The Transatlantic Trade Investment Partnership’, Trade - European Commission. Retrieved from: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=1230 [accessed 30 June 2019]
- European Commission – Trade (29 February 2016), ‘CETA: EU and Canada Agree on New Approach on Investment in Trade Agreement’. Retrieved from: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=1468 [accessed 17 April 2019]
- European Commission (14 Oct 2015), Communication on ‘Trade for All: Towards a More Responsible Trade and Invesment Policy’. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2015/EN/1-2015-497-EN-F1-1.PDF [accessed 30 June 2019]
- European Commission (21 April 2018), ‘EU and Mexico Reach New Agreement on Trade’. Retrieved from: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=1830 [accessed 17 April 2019]
- European Commission (15 February 2017), Press release ‘CETA - a Trade Deal That Sets a New Standard for Global Trade’. Retrieved from: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-17-271_en.htm [accessed 16 April 2019]
- European Commission (12 November 2015), ‘Press Release - Why the New EU Proposal for an Investment Court System in TTIP Is Beneficial to Both States and Investors’. Retrieved from: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-15-6060_en.htm [accessed 17 April 2019].
- European Commission (2015), ‘Trade for All: Towards a More Responsible Trade and Investment Policy’. p 7
- European Commission (11 July 2017), ‘Trade and Sustainable Development (TSD) chapters in EU Free Trade Agreements (FTAs)’, Non-paper of the Commission services. Retrieved from: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2017/july/tradoc_155686.pdf [accessed 26 April 2019]
- Gallagher P. (17 March 2016), ‘TTIP: Big Business and US to Have Major Say in EU Trade Deals, Leak Reveals’, Independent. Retrieved from: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/ttip-big-business-and-us-to-have-major-say-in-eu-trade-deals-leak-reveals-a6937141.html [accessed 30 June 2019]
- Gordon K. and Pohl J., ‘Environmental Concerns in International Investment Agreements: A Survey, OECD Working Papers on International Investment, No. 2011/1, OECD Investment Division’. Retrieved from: www.oecd.org/daf/investment/workingpapers [accessed 30 June 2019]
- Hindelang S. and Krajewski M. (eds.) (2016), Shifting Paradigms in International Investment Law: More Balanced, Less Isolated, Increasingly Diversified Oxford University Press
- Human Right Watch (10 January 2019), ‘EU: Postpone Vote on Vietnam Free Trade Agreement’. Retrieved from: https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/01/10/eu-postpone-vote-vietnam-free-trade-agreement [accessed 30 June 2019]
- Kim J. (2017), ‘Balancing Regulatory Interests through an Exceptions Framework under the Right to Regulate Provision in International Investment Agreements’, 50 George Washington International Law Review 289
- Lan H. N. T. (2018), ‘Disputes Related to Indirect-Expropriation in Environmental Management – Experiences to Prevent the Risks of Investor-State Disputes for Viet Nam’, in Dung T. V., and Lan H. N. T. (editors), Investor-State dispute settlement: Legal issues and practice in the context of integration, Ho Chi Minh city National University Publishing
- Mestral A. de (2015), ‘When Does the Exception Become the Rule? Conserving Regulatory Space under CETA’, 18 Journal of International Economic Law 641
- Parliamentary Assembly (2017), ‘Resolution 2152 - “New Generation” Trade Agreements and Their Implications for Social Rights, Public Health and Sustainable Development’ 2. Retrieved from: http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-EN.asp?fileid=23489 [accessed 30 June 2019]
- Prislan V. and Zandvliet R., ‘Labor Provisions in International Investment Agreements: Prospects for Sustainable Development’ in Andrea K. Bjorklund ed., Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2012-2013, 357-413 (2014)
- Sands P. and Peel J., Fabra A., MacKenzie R. (2018), Principles of International Environmental Law (4th ed.), Cambridge University Press
- Schreuer C. (Brill 2010), ‘Diversity And Harmonization Of Treaty Interpretation In Investment Arbitration’ in Merkouris P., Elias O. and Fitzmaurice M. (eds), Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years on
- Subedi S. P. (2018), International Investment Law-Reconciling Policy And Principle, Hart Publishing
- Titi C. (2015), ‘International Investment Law and the European Union: Towards a New Generation of International Investment Agreements’, 26 European Journal of International Law 639
- Vandevelde K. J. (2013), ‘Rebalancing through exceptions’, LEWIS & CLARK LAW REVIEW, Vol. 17:2, 449-459
- Viñuales J. E. (2012), Foreign Investment and the Environment in International Law, Cambridge University Press
- Zhou W. (2017), ‘Chinese Investment in Australia: A Critical Analysis of the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement’ 18(2) Melbourne Journal of International Law 407. Retrieved from: http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/MelbJIL/2017/18.html#Heading227 [accessed 8 November 2019]