Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Conceptual Framework for Assessing the Impact of Implementing an Integrated Territorial Approach for Regional Development Cover

Conceptual Framework for Assessing the Impact of Implementing an Integrated Territorial Approach for Regional Development

Open Access
|Jan 2024

References

  1. Barca, F., 2009. An agenda for a reformed Cohesion Policy, A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectation. Independent Report for DGRegio, Brussels: European Comission.
  2. Camagni, R., Capello, R. & Caragliu,, A., 2019. Measuring the impact of legal and administrative international barriers on regional growth. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 2(11), pp. 345-366, https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12195
  3. Churski, P., Kociuba, D., Ochojski, A. & Polko, A., 2017. Towards policy–place-based policy and smart specialisation. Palgrave Macmillan. Springer, pp. 267-380, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-51505-2_5
  4. European Commission and European Investment Bank, 2013. Methodologies for Assessing Social and Economic Performance in JESSICA. Final Report: European Commission and European Investment Bank.
  5. European Commission, 2015. Guidance document on Evaluation Plans. Terms of Reference for Impact Evaluations. Guidance on Quality Management of External Evaluation: European Commission.
  6. Ferry, M. & Davies, S., 2015. Impact evaluation of regional policy business support: what is the evidence?. EoRPA Paper, European Policies Research Centre, 15(6).
  7. Ferry, M., Kah, S. & Bachtler, J., 2018. Integrated territorial development: new instruments – new results?: Technical University Delft.
  8. Ferry, M., McMaster, I. & Van der Zwet, A., 2018. Assessing the performance of integrated territorial and urban strategies: Challenges, emerging approaches and options for the future: European Policies Research Centre.
  9. Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J. & Graham, . W. F., 1989. Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs.. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Том 11(3), pp. 255-274, https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011003255
  10. Kociuba, D., 2018. Implementation of integrated territorial investments in Poland – rationale, results, and recommendations. QUAESTIONES GEOGRAPHICAE, 4(37), DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2018-0038
  11. Polverari, L., 2015. The monitoring and evaluation of the 2014-20 Cohesion policy programmes. IQ-Net Thematic Paper, 2(36).
  12. Tödtling, F. & Trippl, M., 2005. One size fits all? Towards a dif¬ferentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, Issue 34, p. 1203–1219, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
  13. Van der Zwet, A., Ferry, M. & McMaster, I., 2018. Assessing the performance of integrated territorial and urban strategies. Challenges, emerging approaches and options for the future. Final Report to the European Commission., неизв.: European Policies Research Centre.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/vjes-2023-0015 | Journal eISSN: 2344-4924 | Journal ISSN: 2067-9440
Language: English
Page range: 49 - 54
Published on: Jan 29, 2024
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2024 Mariela Stoyanova, published by Valahia University of Targoviste
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.