Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Design and implementation of agent interaction mechanisms for emotionally intelligent tutoring systems Cover

Design and implementation of agent interaction mechanisms for emotionally intelligent tutoring systems

Open Access
|Nov 2012

References

  1. [1] C. Hinton, K. Miyamoto, B. Della-Chiesa, “Brain Research, Learning and Emotions: implications for education research, policy and practice,” Eur.J.Edu., vol.43, no.1, pp.87-103, 2008.
  2. [2] C.Lawson, “The connections between emotions and learning”. [Online]. Available: http://www.cdl.org/resource-library/articles/connect_ emotions.php [Accessed: Sept. 27, 2011].
  3. [3] E.W.Taylor, „Transformative learning theory: a neurobiological perspective of the role of emotions and unconscious ways of knowing.” Int. J. of Lifelong Education, vol.20, no.3, pp.218-236, May-June 2001.
  4. [4] A. Anohina and L. Intenberga, “The Set of Agents for the Modelling of Student’s Emotions in Intelligent Tutoring Systems,” in, 2008, pp.73-78.
  5. [5] R.Picard,Cambridge: MIT Press, 1997.
  6. [6] M.Ochs and C.Frasson, “Optimal emotional conditions for learning with an intelligent tutoring system,” in, 2004, pp.845-847.
  7. [7] A. Sarrafzadeh, A. Alexander, F. Dadgostar, C. Fan, A. Bigdeli, “How do you know that I don't understand? A look at the future of intelligent tutoring systems,” Comp.in Hum.Beh., vol.24, no.4, pp.1342-1363, 2008.
  8. [8] E.Alepis, M. Virvou, K. Kabassi, “Requirements analysis and design of an affective bi-modal intelligent tutoring system: the case of keyboard and microphone,” Stud. in Comp. Intel., vol.104, pp.9-24, 2008.
  9. [9] S. D'Mello, A. Graesser, R.W. Picard, “Toward an affect-sensitive AutoTutor”, Intel.Syst., vol.22, iss.4, pp.53-61, 2007.
  10. [10] S.Russell and P.Norvig,. Prentice Hall, 2009.
  11. [11] T. Finin et. al., KQML as an Agent Communication Language, in, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.
  12. [12] D. Keil and D.Q. Goldin, “Indirect Interaction in Environments for Multi-agent Systems”, in, 2005, pp.68-87.
  13. [13] R. Becker et al., “Analyzing Myopic Approaches for Multi-Agent Communication,” Computational Intelligence, vol. 25, no. 1, pp.31-50, Feb. 2009.
  14. [14] Y. Shoham and K. Leyton-Brown,, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
  15. [15] M. Wooldridge,, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
  16. [16] “Multi-agent systems”. [Online]. Available: http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~softagents/multi.html. [Accessed: Sept. 27, 2011].
  17. [17] K. Sycara, “Multiagent systems,” AI Magazine, vol.19, no.2, pp.79-92, 1998.
  18. [18] B. Bauer et. al., “Agent UML: A Formalism for Specifying Multiagent Software Systems,” International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, vol. 11, no. 3, pp.207-230, Jun. 2001.
  19. [19] M. Huget, “Agent UML Notation for Multiagent System Design,” IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 8, no. 4, pp.63-71, Jul/Aug. 2004.
  20. [20] F. Bellifemine, F. Bergenti, G. Caire, and A. Poggi, ”JADE - A Java Agent Development Framework,” in, Springer, 2005, pp. 125-148
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10312-012-0006-2 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8691 | Journal ISSN: 2255-8683 (formerly 2255-8691)
Language: English
Page range: 44 - 53
Published on: Nov 8, 2012
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open

© 2012 Sintija Petrovica, Alla Anohina-Naumeca, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.