Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Ontology merging in the context of concept maps Cover

Ontology merging in the context of concept maps

Applied Computer Systems
Volume 13 (2012): Issue 1 (October 2012)
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Nov 2012
References

References

  1. [1] Anohina A., Grundspenkis J. Prototype of Multiagent Knowledge Assessment System for Support of Process Oriented Learning. In Proceedings of the 7th International Baltic Conference on Databases and Information Systems (Baltic DB&IS 2006), July 3-6, 2006, Vilnius, Lithuania, pp. 211-219.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. [2] Anohina A., Grundspenkis J. Learner's Support in the Concept Map Based Knowledge Assessment System. In Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on e-Learning, November 6-7, 2008, Agia Napa, Cyprus, Vol.1, pp. 38-45.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. [3] Anohina A., Stale G., Pozdnakovs D. Intelligent System for Student Knowledge Assessment. In Scientific Proceedings of Riga Technical University, 5th Series, Computer Science. Applied Computer Systems, Vol. 26, 2006, pp.132-143.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. [4] Anohina A., Vilkelis M., Lukasenko R. Incremental Improvement of the Evaluation Algorithm in the Concept Map Based Knowledge Assessment System. In International Journal of Computers, Communication and Control, 4(1), 2009, pp. 6-16.10.15837/ijccc.2009.1.2409
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. [5] Grundspenkis J., Anohina A. Evolution of the Concept Map Based Adaptive Knowledge Assessment System: Implementation and Evaluation Results. In Scientific Proceedings of Riga Technical University, 5th Series, Computer Science. Applied Computer Systems, Vol. 38, 2009, pp. 13-24.10.2478/v10143-009-0001-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. [6] Vilkelis M., Anohina A., Lukashenko R. Architecture and Working Principles of the Concept Map Based Knowledge Assessment System. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Virtual Learning (ICVL 2008), October 31 - November 2, 2008, Constanta, Romania, pp. 81-90.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. [7] Ehrig M. Ontology Alignment: Bringing the Semantic Gap. Berlin- Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2007, 247 p.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. [8] Euzenat J., Shvaiko P. Ontology Matching. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer- Verlag, 2007, 333 p.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. [9] Fellbaum C. (Ed.). WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998, 422 p.10.7551/mitpress/7287.001.0001
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. [10] Moser T., Schimper K., Mordinyi R., Anjomshoaa A. SAMOA - A Semi-automated Ontology Alignment Method for Systems Integration in Safety-critical Environments. International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems, Fukuoka, Japan, 16-19 March 2009, pp. 724-729.10.1109/CISIS.2009.138
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. [11] Fridman Noy N., Musen M.A. PROMPT: Algorithm and Tool for Automated Ontology Merging and Alignment, In Proceedings of the 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and 12th Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, July 30 - August 3, 2000, Austin, USA, pp. 450-455.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. [12] Graudina V., Grundspenkis J. Algorithm of Concept Map Transformation to Ontology for Usage in Intelligent Knowledge Assessment System. International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies (CompSysTech'11), June, 16-17, 2011, Vienna, Austria, pp. 109-11410.1145/2023607.2023627
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. [13] Graudina V., Grundspenkis J. Concept Map Generation from OWL Ontologies. The 3rd International Conference on Concept Mapping, September, 22-25, 2008, Tallinn, Estonia and Helsinki, Finland, 2008, pp. 173-180.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. [14] Graudina V. OWL Ontology Transformation into Concept Map. In Scientific Proceedings of Riga Technical University, 5th Series, Computer Science. Applied Computer Systems, Vol. 34, 2008, pp.80-91.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. [15] OWL Web Ontology Language Guide. Available at: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/ ( accessed 27.09.2011 )
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. [16] Novak J.D., Cañas A.J. The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct Them, Technical Report IHMC CmapTools. Revised 01- 2008, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, 2008, 36 p. Available at http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/Theory UnderlyingConceptMapsHQ.pdf (accessed 10.09.2011).
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. [17] Graudina V. Algorithms for Knowledge Remediation in Concept Map Based Assessment System. 2nd International Workshop on Intelligent Educational Systems and Technology-enhanced Learning (INTEL-EDU 2011), October 6, 2011, Riga Latvia. Local Proceedings of the 10th International Conference BIR, Associated Workshops and Doctoral Consortium, pp. 281-288.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10312-012-0004-4 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8691 | Journal ISSN: 2255-8683
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 29 - 36
Published on: Nov 8, 2012
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open
Keywords:
Ontology merging,
concept maps,
similarity measures
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Artificial intelligence,
Information technology,
Project management,
Software development

© 2012 Vita Graudina, Janis Grundspenkis, Sigita Milasevica, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 13 (2012): Issue 1 (October 2012)
Previous article
Next article