Using Principle of Complementarity when Diagnosing Complex Logistic Activities by Applying Alternative Approach

Kopytov, Rostislav; Faingloz, Lev; Cernavskis, Konstantins

doi:10.2478/v10244-012-0027-3

Abstract

The paper considers the problem of obtaining new data in process of diagnostics of a recognized transportation company. Such knowledge should not contradict to existing theories and objective means, but should be aimed instead at improving the diagnoses issued. By investigating the methodological problem by virtue of the principle of complementarity, the goals of making fundamental changes are achieved without disturbing the efficiency of the enterprise activities.

References

1. Altman, E. (1993). Corporate Financial Distress and Bankruptcy. New York: Wiley & Sons.
Search in Google Scholar
2. Altman, E., Hartzell, J. & Peck, M. (1995). Emerging Markets Corporate Bonds: A Scoring System. New York: Salomon Brothers, Inc.
Search in Google Scholar
3. Altman, E. (2002). Bankruptcy, Credit Risk and High Yield ‘Junk’ Bonds: A Compendium ofWritings. Oxford, England and Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing,
Search in Google Scholar
4. Olve, N., Roy, J., Wetter, M. (1999). Performance Drivers. A Practical Guide to Using the BalancedScorecard. New York: Wiley & Sons,
Search in Google Scholar
5. Blank, I.A. (2004). Financial Management. Kiev: Nika-Centr. (In Russian)
Search in Google Scholar
6. Barnard, C.I. (1948). Organization and Management: Selected Papers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674280625
Search in Google Scholar
7. Arnold, G. (1998). Corporate Financial Management. London, UK: Pitman Publishing.
Search in Google Scholar
8. Kovalev, V.V. (2002). Financial Analysis: Methods and Procedures. Moscow: Finansi i Statistika, (In Russian)
Search in Google Scholar
9. Marshall, J. & Bansal, V. (1992). Financial Engineering. A Complete Guide to Financial Innovation. New York: Institute of Finance.
Search in Google Scholar
10. Niven, P. (2002). Balanced Scorecard Step-by-Step. Maximizing Performance and MaintainingResults. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
Search in Google Scholar
11. Prigozhin, A.I. (2003). Organization Developments’ Methods. Moscow: MCFER. (In Russian).
Search in Google Scholar
12. Read, C. & Scheuermann, H. (2003). The CFO as Business Integrator. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Search in Google Scholar
13. Cokins, G. (2004). Performance Management: Finding the Missing Pieces (To Close the IntelligenceGap). Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Search in Google Scholar
14. Kopitov, R. (2006). Financial Management and Control. Riga: TTI. (In Russian)
Search in Google Scholar
15. Kaplan, R., Norton, D. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business Review Press.
Search in Google Scholar
16. Jones, E. (1994). The Financial Guide to Business Finance. London, UK: Pearson Professional Education.
Search in Google Scholar
17. Scott, M. (2000). Cost factors: Manual for managers to reveal value chain development tools. Moscow: Olympia Business. (In Russian)
Search in Google Scholar
18. Kaplan, R., Norton, D. (2004). Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into TangibleOutcomes. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business Review Press.
Search in Google Scholar
19. Kaplan, R., Norton, D. (2006). Alignment: Using the Balanced Scorecard to Create CorporateSynergies. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business School Press.
Search in Google Scholar
20. Kaplan, R., Norton, D. (2006). How to Implement a New Strategy Without Disrupting YourOrganization. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business Review Press.
Search in Google Scholar
21. Kaplan, R., Norton D. (2008). Execution Premium. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business School Press.
Search in Google Scholar
22. Van Horrne, J.,Vachowicz, J. Jr. (2001). Fundamentals of Financial Management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Search in Google Scholar
23. Lee, C., Finnerty, J. (1999). Corporative Finance: Theory, Method and Applications. New York: HBJ.
Search in Google Scholar
24. Couplend, T., Koller, T., Murrin, J. (1995). Valuation: The Value of Companies: Measuring andManaging. The Value Companies. New York: Wiley & Sons.
Search in Google Scholar
25. Couplend, T., Koller, T., Murrin, J. (1999). Valuation: The Value of Companies: Measuring &Managing. New York: Wiley & Sons.
Search in Google Scholar
26. Doyle, P. (2000). Value-Based Marketing: Marketing Strategies for Corporate Growth and ShareholderValue Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
Search in Google Scholar
27. Egerev, I.A. (2003). Evaluation of business: The art of management. Moscow: Delo.
Search in Google Scholar
28. Gryaznova, A.G. (2005). Business Value. Moscow: Finansi i Statistika.
Search in Google Scholar
29. Couplend, T., Dolgoff, A. (2005). Expectations-Based Management: A State-of-the-Art Approach toCreating and Enhancing Shareholder Value. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Search in Google Scholar
30. Copeland, T. & Dolgoff, A. (2006). Expectations-Based Management. Journal of Applied CorporateFinance, 18 (2), pp. 82-97.10.1111/j.1745-6622.2006.00089.x
Search in Google Scholar
31. Kopitov, R., Faingloz, L. (2008). Ways of Transforming Aims into Results at Successful Companies. Technological and Economic Development of Economy. Baltic Journal on Sustainability, 14(3), 312-326. DOI: 10.386/1342-8619.2008.14.10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.312-327
Search in Google Scholar
32. Kopitov, R. (2009). Managerial principles as the foundation of the control style transformation. In Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference “INSIGHTS INTO THE SUSTAINABLE GROWTH OF BUSINESS (MMRC 2009)”, November 19-21, 2009 (pp. 1-19). Vilnius, Lithuania: ISM University of Management and Economics.
Search in Google Scholar
33. Ivashkovskaya, I.V. (2012). Company’s Value Modelling. Moscow: INFRA-M. (In Russian)
Search in Google Scholar
34. Schedrovitsky, G.P. (1995). Selectas. Moscow: Sch.Kult.Polit. (In Russian)
Search in Google Scholar
35. Prigozhin, A.I. (2007). Disorganisation: Causes, Types, Overcoming. Moscow: Alpina Business Books. (In Russian)
Search in Google Scholar
36. Neave, H. (1990). The Deming Demission. Tennessee, Knoxville: SPC Press.
Search in Google Scholar
37. Novikov, A.M. & Novikov, D.A. (2010). Science’s Investigations Methodology. Moscow: Librkom. (In Russian)
Search in Google Scholar
38. Cummings, S. (2005). Recreating Strategy. London, UK: SAGE Publications,
Search in Google Scholar
39. Litvak, B.G. (2012). Management Science. Moscow: Delo. (In Russian)
Search in Google Scholar
40. Ansoff, I. (1969). Business Strategy. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Search in Google Scholar
41. Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and Difference. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, Ltd.
Search in Google Scholar
42. Teslimov, A. (2011). Business Changes: 9 Rules and 70 Lessons of the Your Business Assigns. Moscow: Eksmo. (In Russian)
Search in Google Scholar
43. Kopytov, R., Faingloz, L. (2011). Investigation of Factors Influencing Logistic Activities. In Proceedings of the Conference ‘Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication‘ (RelStat’11), Riga, Latvia, October 19-22, 2011 (pp. 186-200). Riga: Transport and Telecommunication Institute.
Search in Google Scholar

Using Principle of Complementarity when Diagnosing Complex Logistic Activities by Applying Alternative Approach

Abstract

Paradigm

My account