Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Educational Action Research to Generate Ecological Wisdom of Insight for Inclusion and Sustainability Cover

Educational Action Research to Generate Ecological Wisdom of Insight for Inclusion and Sustainability

Open Access
|Jun 2012

References

  1. Aalsburg Wiessner, C., & Mezirow, J. (2000). Theory building and the search for common ground. In J. Mezirow & Associates (Eds.),(pp. 329-358). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  2. Ahteenmaki-Pelkonen, L. (2002). Transformative adult learning: A systematic analysis of Jack Mezirow's conceptions.(3), 2-10.
  3. Aristotelis. (1985).[Nicomachean ethics]. Rīga: Zvaigzne.
  4. Ashman, I., & Lawler, J. (2008). Existential communication and leadership.(3), 253-269. DOI: 10.1177/1742715008092361.
  5. Ballard, D. (2005). Using learning processes to promote change for sustainable development.(2), 135-156. DOI: 10.1177/1476750305052138.
  6. Belousa, I. (2002). Sustainable education and spirituality in the university: Looking for a way of complementation., 3-12.
  7. Birmingham, C. (2004). Phronesis: A model for pedagogical reflection.(4), 313-324. DOI: 10.1177/0022487104266725.
  8. Bradbury Huang, H. (2010). What is good action research?: Why the resurgent interest?(1), 93-109. DOI: 10.1177/1476750310362435.
  9. Bradbury, H., & Reason, P. (2003). Action research: An opportunity for revitalizing research purpose and practices.(2), 155-175. DOI: 10.1177/1473325003002002003.
  10. Brereton, D. P. (2009). Why sociocultural anthropology needs John Dewey's evolutionary model of experience.(5), 5-32. DOI: 10.1177/1463499609103545.
  11. Brydon-Miller, M., Greenwood, D., & Maguire, P. (2003). Why action research?(1), 9-28. DOI: 10.1177/14767503030011002.
  12. Buber, M. (2002).London, New York: Routledge Classics.
  13. Cassell, C., & Johnson, P. (2006). Action research: Explaining the diversity.(6), 783-814. DOI: 10.1177/18726706067080.
  14. Caterino, B. (2005). Book review: Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again., 233-237. DOI: 10.1177/0486613404272696.
  15. Cranton, P. (2000). Individual differences and transformative learning. In J. Mezirow & Associates (Eds.),(pp. 181-204). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  16. Cranton, P. (2002). Teaching for transformation., 63-71.
  17. DeLue, S. M. (2006). Martin Buber and Immanuel Kant on mutual respect and the liberal state.(1), 117-133.
  18. Flyvbjerg, B. (2001).Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  19. Flyvbjerg, B. (2004). Phronetic planning research: Theoretical and methodological reflections.(3), 283-306. DOI: 10.1080/1464935042000250195.
  20. Gayá Wicks, P., & Reason, P. (2009). Initiating action research: Challenges and paradoxes of opening communicative space.(3), 243-262. DOI: 10.1177/1476750309336715.
  21. Goodnaugh, K. (2010). The role of action research in transforming teacher identity: Modes of belonging and ecological perspectives.(2), 167-182. DOI: 10.1080/09650791003740725.
  22. Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness., 105-112.
  23. Gravett, S. (2004). Action research and transformative learning in teacher development.(2), 259-272. DOI: 10.1080/09650790400200248.
  24. Grint, K. (2007). Learning to lead: Can Aristotle help us find the road to wisdom?(2), 231-246. DOI: 10.1177/1742715007076215.
  25. Iliško, Dz. (2005). Pedagogical challenges for implementing holistic curriculum in Latvia., 28-39.
  26. Iliško, Dz., & Kokina, I. (2003). Ecofeminism as a viable perspective for a sustainable model of education in Latvia., 3-14.
  27. Kelly, P. (2006). Learning for sustainable futures: One intervention.(3), 1-14.
  28. Kinsler, K. (2010). The utility of educational action research for emancipatory change.(2), 171-189. DOI: 10.1177/1476750309351357.
  29. Kitchenham, A. (2008). The evolution of John Mezirow's transformative learning theory.(2), 104-123. DOI: 10.1177/1541344608322678.
  30. Leitch, R., & Day, C. (2000). Action research and reflective practice: Towards a holistic view.(1), 179-193.
  31. Moore, J. (2005). Is higher education ready for transformative learning? A question explored in the study of sustainability.(1), 76-91. DOI: 10.1177/1541344604270862.
  32. Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like and adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In J. Mezirow & Associates (Eds.),(pp. 3-34). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  33. O'Sullivan, E. (1999).London, New York: Zed Books. In association with University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
  34. Oreszczyn, S., & Levidow, L. (2010). Call for papers: Action research Journal: Special issue on civil society research for sustainable development.(3), 357-359. DOI: 10.1177/1476750310381915.
  35. Pipere, A. (2007). Becoming a researcher: Interplay of identity and sustainability. In A. Pipere (Ed.)," (Vol. 2, pp. 241-262). Daugavpils: Daugavpils University Academic Press "Saule".
  36. Price, J. N., & Valli, L. (2005). Preservice teachers becoming agents of change: Pedagogical implications for action research.(1), 57-72. DOI: 10.1177/0022487104272097.
  37. Reason, P. (1999). Integrating action and reflection through co-operative inquiry.(2), 207-226. DOI: 10.1177/1350507699302007.
  38. Reason, P. (2003). Pragmatist philosophy and action research: Readings and conversation with Richard Rorty.(1), 103-123. DOI: 10.1177/14767503030011007.
  39. Reason, P. (2006). Choice and quality in action research practice.(2), 187-203. DOI: 10.1177/1056492606288074.
  40. Reason, P. (2007). Education for ecology: Science, aesthetics, spirit and ceremony.(1), 27-44. DOI: 10.1177/1350507607073021.
  41. Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds). (2001).London: Sage Publications.
  42. Rofrano, F. J. (2007). I/Thou-I/Spirit: Martin Buber and the spiritual life of the infant., 56-69.
  43. Ryland, E. (2000). Gaia rising: A Jungian look at environmental consciousness and sustainable organizations.(4), 381-402. DOI: 10.1177/1086026600134001.
  44. Salīte, I. (1993).[The raising of students' professional readiness for the ecological education mission at school]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.
  45. Salīte, I. (2002). Teachers' views on the aim of education for sustainable development., 68-80.
  46. Salīte, I. (2008). Educational action research for sustainability: Constructing a vision for the future in teacher education., 5-16.
  47. Salīte, I., Gedžūne, G., & Gedžūne, I. (2009). Educational action research for sustainability: Seeking wisdom of insight in teacher education.(2), 14-30. DOI: 10.2478/v10099-009-0037-y.
  48. Salīte, I., & Klepere, R. (2003). Biotism as a ground for the education of reflection in teacher education., 44-58.
  49. Smith, R. (1999). Paths of judgement: The revival of practical wisdom.(3), 327-240.
  50. Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis.(17). Retrieved September 30, 2011, from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17
  51. Volk, K. S. (2009). Action research as a sustainable endeavor for teachers: Does initial training lead to further action?(3), 315-332. DOI: 10.1177/1476750309351358.
  52. Yorks, L., & Kasl, E. (2006). I know more than I can say: A taxonomy for using expressive ways of knowing to foster transformative learning.(1), 43-64. DOI: 10.1177/1541344605283151.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10230-011-0001-7 | Journal eISSN: 2255-7547 | Journal ISSN: 1691-6301 (formerly 2255-7547)
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 31
Published on: Jun 14, 2012
Published by: Daugavpils University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2012 Inga Gedžūne, Ginta Gedžūne, Astrīda Skrinda, Ilona Mičule, published by Daugavpils University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.