Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Negative impacts of high-stakes testing Cover

Negative impacts of high-stakes testing

Journal of Pedagogy
Volume 3 (2012): Issue 1 (June 2012)
By:   
Open Access
|Aug 2012
References

References

  1. Afflerbach, P. (2005). National reading conference policy brief, high stakes testing and reading assessment., 37 (2), 151-162.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Amrein, A.L. & Berliner, D.C. (2002).Retrieved June, 20, 2012, from http://nepc.colorado.edu/files/EPSL-0211-125-EPRU.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Baines, L. A. & Stanley, G. K. (2004). High - stakes hustle: Public schools and the new billion dollar accountability., 69 (1), 8-15.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Barksdale-Ladd, M. A. & Thomas, K., F. (2000). What's at stake in high-stakes testing: teachers and parents speak out., 51(5), 384-397.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Blazer, Ch. (2011).Research Services 1008.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Booher-Jennings J. (2008). Learning to label: socialisation, gender, and the hidden curriculum of high-stakes testing., 29(2), 149-160.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Caldwell, B., J. (2011).Retrieved June, 20, 2012, from HKIEd website http://www.ied.edu.hk/apclc/roundtable2011/paper/Brian%20J.Caldwell.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Duncan, B. A. & Stevens, A. (2011). High - stakes standardized testing: Help or hindrance to public education., 36 (2), 35-43.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Educational Act. 1980. Retrieved June, 20, 2012, from Education in England website
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Education Reform Act. 1988. Retrieved June, 20, 2012, from Education in England website
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. French, D. (2003). A New vision of authentic assessment to overcome the flaws in high stakes testing., 35(1), 1-15.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Graber, D. (2011).Retrieved June, 20, 2012, from Manchester College website http://users.manchester.edu/Student/asgraber/ProfWeb/GraberDrewS230HStkspaper.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Grant, C. A. (2004). Oppression, privilege and high - stakes testing., 6 (1), 3-11.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Heubert, P. & Hauser, R. M. (1999).Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Jehlen, A. (2007).Retrieved June, 20, 2012, from The National Education Association website: http://www.nea.org/home/11366.htm
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, E.G. (1992). The Design of the national assessment of educational progress., 29 (2), 95-110.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Jones, M. G., Jones, B. D., Hardin, B., Chapman, L., Yarbrough, T. & Davis, M. (1999). The impact of high-stakes testing on teachers and students in North Carolina., 81 (3), 199-203.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Kaščák, O. & Pupala, B. (2011). Nový režim "kvality". In O. Kaščák & B. Pupala (Eds.).(pp. 137-194). Bratislava: Renesans.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Kentli, F. D. (2009). Comparison of hidden curriculum theories., 1(2). Retrieved June, 20, 2012, from http://www.ozelacademy. com/EJES_v1n2_Kentli.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Lobascher, S. (2011). What are the potential impacts of high - stakes testing on literacy education in Australia?, 19(2), 9.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Madaus, G., Russell, M. (2010). Paradoxes of high - stakes testing., 190 (1/2), 21-30.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Marchant, G. (2004). What is at stake with high stakes testing? A Discussion of issues and research., 104 (2), 2-7.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. McMillan, J., Myran, S. & Workman, D. (1999).Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, p. 10.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. McNeil, L. (2000).New York, NY: Routledge
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Moon, T., R; Brighton, C., M.; Jarvis, J., M. & Hall, C. J (2007).Retrieved June, 20, 2012, from National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/nrcgt.html
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. National PTA. 2006. Recess is at risk, new campaign comes to the rescue. Retrieved June, 20, 2012, from
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Niculae, M., & Doncu, R. (2007).Analele Universităii din Bucuresti. Retrieved July, 10, 2012, from http://anale.fizica.unibuc.ro/arhiva/2007/An_Fiz_2007_5.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Nichols, S., L. & Berliner, D., C. (2007).Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Petrová, Z. (2011). Dopady vzdelávacej reformy v Anglicku a vo Walese. In O. Kaščák & B. Pupala (Eds.).(pp. 84-106). Bratislava: Renesans
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Reddell, S. (2010).Retrieved June. 20, 2012, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED513338&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED513338
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Sadker, D. & Zittleman, K. (2004).Retrieved June, 20, 2012, from http://www.sadker.org/PDF/test_anxiety.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Stecher, B. M. (2002). Consequences of large-scale, high stakes testing on school and classroom practice. L. S. Hamilton, B. M. Stecher & S. P. Klein (Eds.).(pp. 79-100). Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. West, A. & Pennell, H. (2002).Retrieved June, 20, 2012, from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/214/
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. West, A. (2010). High stakes testing, accountability, incentives and consequences in English schools., 38(1), 23-39.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. Westchester Institute for Human Services Research. (2003)., 7(1). Retrieved June, 20, 2012, from
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Wilkins, A. (2012). School choice and the commodification of education: a visual approach to school brochures and websites., 32 (1), 69-86.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. Woods, P., A., Bagley, C. & Glatter, R. (1998).London: Routledge.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10159-012-0004-x | Journal eISSN: 1338-2144 (formerly 1338-1563) | Journal ISSN: 1338-1563
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 82 - 100
Published on: Aug 21, 2012
Published by: University of Trnava, Faculty of Education
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
High-stakes testing,
negative impacts,
students,
teaching,
learning,
teachers,
schools
Related subjects:
Social sciences,
Education,
Education, other

© 2012 Michaela Minarechová, published by University of Trnava, Faculty of Education
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 3 (2012): Issue 1 (June 2012)
Previous article
Next article