Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Negative impacts of high-stakes testing Cover

Negative impacts of high-stakes testing

Journal of Pedagogy
Volume 3 (2012): Issue 1 (June 2012)
By: Michaela Minarechová  
Open Access
|Aug 2012

References

  1. Afflerbach, P. (2005). National reading conference policy brief, high stakes testing and reading assessment. Journal of Literacy Research, 37 (2), 151-162.10.1207/s15548430jlr3702_2
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Amrein, A.L. & Berliner, D.C. (2002). An analysis of some unintended and negative consequences of high-stakes testing. Retrieved June, 20, 2012, from http://nepc.colorado.edu/files/EPSL-0211-125-EPRU.pdf http://nepc.colorado.edu/files/EPSL-0211-125-EPRU.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Baines, L. A. & Stanley, G. K. (2004). High - stakes hustle: Public schools and the new billion dollar accountability. The Educational Forum, 69 (1), 8-15.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Barksdale-Ladd, M. A. & Thomas, K., F. (2000). What's at stake in high-stakes testing: teachers and parents speak out. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(5), 384-397.10.1177/0022487100051005006
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Blazer, Ch. (2011). Unintended consequences of high-stakes testing. Research Services 1008.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Booher-Jennings J. (2008). Learning to label: socialisation, gender, and the hidden curriculum of high-stakes testing. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(2), 149-160.10.1080/01425690701837513
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Caldwell, B., J. (2011). Educational reform and change in Australia. Retrieved June, 20, 2012, from HKIEd website http://www.ied.edu.hk/apclc/roundtable2011/paper/Brian%20J.Caldwell.pdf http://www.ied.edu.hk/apclc/roundtable2011/paper/Brian%20J.Caldwell.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Duncan, B. A. & Stevens, A. (2011). High - stakes standardized testing: Help or hindrance to public education. National Social Science Journal, 36 (2), 35-43.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Educational Act. 1980. Retrieved June, 20, 2012, from Education in England website http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1980/20/pdfs/ukpga_19800020_en.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Education Reform Act. 1988. Retrieved June, 20, 2012, from Education in England website http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/40/pdfs/ukpga_19880040_en.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. French, D. (2003). A New vision of authentic assessment to overcome the flaws in high stakes testing. Middle School Journal, 35(1), 1-15.10.1080/00940771.2003.11494522
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Graber, D. (2011). The Problem with high stakes testing. Retrieved June, 20, 2012, from Manchester College website http://users.manchester.edu/Student/asgraber/ProfWeb/GraberDrewS230HStkspaper.pdf http://users.manchester.edu/Student/asgraber/ProfWeb/GraberDrewS230HStkspaper.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Grant, C. A. (2004). Oppression, privilege and high - stakes testing. Multicultural Perspectives, 6 (1), 3-11.10.1207/S15327892mcp0601_2
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Heubert, P. & Hauser, R. M. (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion and graduation. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Jehlen, A. (2007). Testing: How the sausage is made. Retrieved June, 20, 2012, from The National Education Association website: http://www.nea.org/home/11366.htm http://www.nea.org/home/11366.htm
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, E.G. (1992). The Design of the national assessment of educational progress. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29 (2), 95-110.10.1111/j.1745-3984.1992.tb00369.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Jones, M. G., Jones, B. D., Hardin, B., Chapman, L., Yarbrough, T. & Davis, M. (1999). The impact of high-stakes testing on teachers and students in North Carolina. Phi Delta Kappan, 81 (3), 199-203.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Kaščák, O. & Pupala, B. (2011). Nový režim "kvality". In O. Kaščák & B. Pupala (Eds.). Školy v prúde reforiem (pp. 137-194). Bratislava: Renesans.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Kentli, F. D. (2009). Comparison of hidden curriculum theories. European Journal of Educational Studies, 1(2). Retrieved June, 20, 2012, from http://www.ozelacademy. com/EJES_v1n2_Kentli.pdf http://www.ozelacademy.com/EJES_v1n2_Kentli.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Lobascher, S. (2011). What are the potential impacts of high - stakes testing on literacy education in Australia? Australian Journal of Language & Literacy. Literacy Learning: the Middle Years, 19(2), 9.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Madaus, G., Russell, M. (2010). Paradoxes of high - stakes testing. Journal of Education, 190 (1/2), 21-30.10.1177/0022057410190001-205
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Marchant, G. (2004). What is at stake with high stakes testing? A Discussion of issues and research. Ohio Journal of Science, 104 (2), 2-7.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. McMillan, J., Myran, S. & Workman, D. (1999). The impact of mandated statewide testing on teachers' classroom assessment and instructional practices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, p. 10.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. McNeil, L. (2000). Contradictions of school reform. New York, NY: Routledge
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Moon, T., R; Brighton, C., M.; Jarvis, J., M. & Hall, C. J (2007). State standardized testing programs: Their effects on teachers and students. Retrieved June, 20, 2012, from National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/nrcgt.html http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/nrcgt.html
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. National PTA. 2006. Recess is at risk, new campaign comes to the rescue. Retrieved June, 20, 2012, from http://www.peacefulplaygrounds.com/pdf/right-to-recess/national-pta-recess-at-risk.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Niculae, M., & Doncu, R. (2007). Romanian Educational System: European Conntext. Analele Universităii din Bucuresti. Retrieved July, 10, 2012, from http://anale.fizica.unibuc.ro/arhiva/2007/An_Fiz_2007_5.pdf http://anale.fizica.unibuc.ro/arhiva/2007/An_Fiz_2007_5.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Nichols, S., L. & Berliner, D., C. (2007). Collateral damage: How high - stakes testing corrupts America's schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Petrová, Z. (2011). Dopady vzdelávacej reformy v Anglicku a vo Walese. In O. Kaščák & B. Pupala (Eds.). Školy v prúde reforiem (pp. 84-106). Bratislava: Renesans
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Reddell, S. (2010). High stakes testing: Our children at risk. Retrieved June. 20, 2012, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED513338&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED513338 http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED513338&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED513338
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Sadker, D. & Zittleman, K. (2004). Test Anxiety: Are students failing tests or are tests failing students? Retrieved June, 20, 2012, from http://www.sadker.org/PDF/test_anxiety.pdf http://www.sadker.org/PDF/test_anxiety.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Stecher, B. M. (2002). Consequences of large-scale, high stakes testing on school and classroom practice. L. S. Hamilton, B. M. Stecher & S. P. Klein (Eds.). Making sense of test-based accountability in education (pp. 79-100). Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. West, A. & Pennell, H. (2002). How new is new labour? The quasi-market and english schools 1997 to 2001. Retrieved June, 20, 2012, from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/214/ http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/214/10.1111/1467-8527.t01-2-00199
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. West, A. (2010). High stakes testing, accountability, incentives and consequences in English schools. Policy & Politics, 38(1), 23-39.10.1332/030557309X445591
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Westchester Institute for Human Services Research. (2003). High - stakes testing. The Balanced View, 7(1). Retrieved June, 20, 2012, from http://www.sharingsuccess.org/code/bv/testing.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Wilkins, A. (2012). School choice and the commodification of education: a visual approach to school brochures and websites. Critical Social Policy, 32 (1), 69-86.10.1177/0261018311425199
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Woods, P., A., Bagley, C. & Glatter, R. (1998). School choice and competition: Markets in the public interest? London: Routledge.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10159-012-0004-x | Journal eISSN: 1338-2144 | Journal ISSN: 1338-1563
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 82 - 100
Published on: Aug 21, 2012
Published by: University of Trnava, Faculty of Education
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
High-stakes testing,
negative impacts,
students,
teaching,
learning,
teachers,
schools
Related subjects:
Social sciences,
Education,
Education, other

© 2012 Michaela Minarechová, published by University of Trnava, Faculty of Education
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 3 (2012): Issue 1 (June 2012)