Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Lost in translation: Ever changing and competing purposes for national examinations in the Czech Republic Cover

Lost in translation: Ever changing and competing purposes for national examinations in the Czech Republic

By:  and    
Open Access
|Aug 2012

References

  1. Amrein, A.L. & Berliner, D.C. (2002a). High-stakes testing, uncertainty, and student learningRetrieved March 24, 2011, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n18/
  2. Amrein, A.L. & Berliner, D.C. (2002b).Tempe, AZ: Education Policy Studies Laboratory, Arizona State University. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from http://www.asu.edu/educ/epsl/EPRU/documents/EPSL-0211-126-EPRU.pdf
  3. Amrein, A.L. & Berliner, D.C. (2002c).Retrieved March 24, 2011, from http://www.asu.edu/educ/epsl/EPRU/documents/EPSL-0211-125-EPRU.pdf
  4. Bîrzea, C. (1996). Educational reform and power struggles in Romania., 31(1), 97-107.
  5. Carnoy, M., Loeb, S. & Smith, T. L. (2000).? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
  6. Catterall, J. S. (1989). Standards and school dropouts: A national study of tests required for graduation., 98(1), 1 - 34.
  7. Čerych, L., Kotásek, J., Kovařovic, J. & Švecová, J. (2000). The Education reform process in the Czech Republic. InStrasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing
  8. Chvál, M., Greger, D., Walterová, E. & Černý, K. (2009) Testování žáků na konci základní školy a státní maturita - aktuální otázky současné vzdělávací politiky., 3(3), 79-102.
  9. Clarke, M., Haney, W. & Madaus, G. (2000). High stakes testing and high school completion., 1(3). Retrieved June, 20, 2012, from http://www.bc.edu/research/nbetpp/publications/v1n3.html
  10. Clements, S. & Kifer, E. (2001).Frankfort, KY: Long-Term Policy Research Center.
  11. Greger, D. & Walterová, E. (Eds.) (2012).New York: Routledge.
  12. Eckstein, M.A. & Noah, H.J. (1989). Forms and functions of secondary - school - leaving examinations., 33(3), 295-316.
  13. Haney, W. (2000). The myth of the Texas miracle in education., 8(41). Retrieved March 24, 2011, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n41/part1.htm
  14. Haertel, E. H. (1999). Validity arguments for high-stakes testing: In search of the evidence., 18(4), 5-9.
  15. Herman, J. L. & Golan, S. (1993). The effects of standardized testing on teaching and schools., 12(4), 20 - 25, 41 - 42.
  16. Hoffman, R. G. (2002).Frankfort KY: Kentucky State Department of Education. Final Report, HumRRO FR-02-46
  17. Hoffman, R. G., Thacker, A. A. & Wise, L. L. (2000).Frankfort KY: Kentucky State Department of Education. Final Report, HumRRO FR-03-06
  18. Hoffman, R. G. & Wise, L.L. (2003).Frankfort KY: Kentucky State Department of Education. Final Report, HumRRO FR-00-41
  19. Hout, M. & Elliott, S.W. (2011).Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  20. Ketter, J. & Pool, J. (2001). Exploring the impact of a high-stakes direct writing assessment in two high school classrooms., 35(3), 344 - 393.
  21. Kifer, E. (1994). Development of the Kentucky instructional results information system (KIRIS). Guskey, T. (ed.)Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
  22. Kifer, E. (2001).Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
  23. Koretz, D. M. & Barron, S. I. (1998).Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation
  24. Kotásek, J. (2005). Vzdělávací politika a rozvoj školství v České republice po roce 1989 - 1. časť., (3), 7-11.
  25. Kotásek, J., Greger, D. & Procházková, I. (2004).Retrieved March 24, 2011, from
  26. OECD 1996.Paris: OECD.
  27. Linn, R. L. (2003). Requirements for measuring adequate yearly progress., winter 2003, 6, 1-4.
  28. Linn, R. L. & Baker, E. (1999). Absolutes, wishful thinking, and norms., Fall 1999, 1-8.
  29. Linn, R. L. & Baker, E. (2000). Closing the gap., Fall 2000, 1-8.
  30. Linn, R. L., Baker, E. & Herman J. L. (2002). No child left behind., Spring 2002, 1-6.
  31. Linn, R. L. & Herman J. L. (1997).Denver CO: Educational Commission of the States and the National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
  32. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (MoEYS) 2001.Prague: ÚIV, Tauris.
  33. OECD. 1996.Paris: OECD.
  34. Orfield, G. & Kornhaber, M. L. (eds.) (2001).Washington D.C.: The Century Foundation Press.
  35. Robitaille, D. (Ed.). (1997).Pacific Educational Press, Vancouver: Canada
  36. Rogosa, D. (1999).Retrieved June, 12, 2012, from http://wwwstat.stanford.edu/~rag/ed351/drrguide.pdf
  37. Santiago, P., Gilmore, A., Nusche, D. & Sammons, P. (2012).Paris: OECD.
  38. Scriven, M. (1993). Hard - Won lessons in program evaluation., 58, 1-107.
  39. Shepard, L.A. (1989, April).Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED334204&ERICExtSearchSearchType_0=no&accno=ED334204
  40. Shepard, L.A. & Dougherty, K. C. (1991).Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED337468&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED337468
  41. ÚIV. 1999.Praha: Tauris.
  42. Voke, H. (2002).Retrieved June, 12, 2012, from http://www.ascd.org/publications/newsletters/policy-priorities/oct02/num31/toc.aspx
  43. Young, J. M. & Yoon, B. (1998).Retrieved June, 12, 2012, from http://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/TECH475.pdf
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10159-012-0003-y | Journal eISSN: 1338-2144 (formerly 1338-1563) | Journal ISSN: 1338-1563
Language: English
Page range: 43 - 81
Published on: Aug 21, 2012
Published by: University of Trnava, Faculty of Education
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2012 D. Greger, E. Kifer, published by University of Trnava, Faculty of Education
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.