Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Urban Nature Between Modern and Postmodern Aesthetics: Reflections Based on the Social Constructivist Approach Cover

Urban Nature Between Modern and Postmodern Aesthetics: Reflections Based on the Social Constructivist Approach

By:   
Open Access
|Jun 2012

References

  1. Baudrillard J., 1994 (1ed. 1979).University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
  2. Bauman Z., 1992.Routledge, London.
  3. Beck U., 1992.Sage, London.
  4. Bourassa S.C., 1991.Belhaven Press, London.
  5. Brown R.H., 1989.University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  6. Burckhardt L., 1980.(No man's land). In: Burckhardt L. (ed.),Schitz, Kassel: 140-141.
  7. Byrne D., 2001.Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, New York.
  8. Clifford D., 1962.Faber and Faber, London.
  9. Croce B., 1995.Hackett Publ., Cambridge, Indianapolis.
  10. Davis M., 1998.Metropolitan Books, New York.
  11. Dear M.J., 2000.Blackwell, Oxford.
  12. Elias N., 2000 (1ed. 1939).Blackwell, Oxford.
  13. Fayet R., 2003.(Purifications. From the waste of the modern to the compost of the postmodern). Passagen-Verl., Wien.
  14. Flusty S., 1997.In: Ellin N. (ed.),Princeton Architectural Press, New York: 48-52.
  15. Foerster H. v., 1992. Entdecken oder Erfinden. Wie lässt sich Verstehen verstehen? (Discover or invent. How is understanding to be understood?). In: Gumin H. & Meier H. (eds),Piper, München, Zürich: 41-88.
  16. Fuller G., 1992.(Kitsch-art. How kitsch gets to be art). DuMont, Köln.
  17. Goodman N., 1968.Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis.
  18. Goodman N., 1992. Kunst und Erkenntnis (Art and knowledge). In: Henrich D. & Iser W. (eds),Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M.: 569-591.
  19. Gross M., 2006.(Nature). Transcript, Bielefeld.
  20. Hartz A. & Kühne O., 2007. Der Regionalpark Saar - eine Betrachtung aus postmoderner Perspektive (The Regional Park Saar - an investigation from the perspective of postmodernity)., 1: 30-43.
  21. Hartz A. & Kühne O., 2009. Aesthetic approaches to active urban landscape planning: European exemplars. In: van der Valk A. & van Dijk T. (eds),Routledge, London: 249-278.
  22. Hartz A. & Kühne O., 2010. Large-scale nature conservation projects as impulse for a pro-active landscape policy in postindustrial regions. In: Carsjens G.J. (ed.),Proceedings of CELA-ISOMUL conference, May 12-14, 2010. Maastricht.
  23. Hasse J., 2000.(The wounds of our city. Towards a new aesthetic of our cities). Passagen-Verl., Wien.
  24. Harvey D., 1989.Blackwell, Oxford.
  25. Horkheimer M., 1982 (1ed. 1937).Continuum Pub. Corp., New York.
  26. Illing F., 2006.(Kitsch, commerce and cult. Sociology of bad taste). UVK-Verl.-Ges, Konstanz.
  27. Jameson F., 1984. Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism., 146: 53-92.
  28. Jessel B., 2004. Von der Kulturlandschaft zur Landschafts-Kultur in Europa. Für die Zukunft: Handlungsmaximen statt fester Leitbilder (From cultural landscape to landscape culture in Europe. For the future: guiding principles instead of fixed mission statements)., 2: 20-27.
  29. Jessel B., 2005. Landschaft (Landscape). In: Ritter E.-H. (ed.),Verlag der ARL, Hannover: 579-586.
  30. Kühne O., 2006.(Landscape in the postmodern era. The example of the German state Saarland). Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden.
  31. Kühne O., 2008.(Distinction - power - landscape. Towards the social definition of landscape). VS, Wiesbaden.
  32. Kühne O. & Franke U., 2010.(Romantic landscape. Impulses to the rediscovery of romantic in the design of landscapes and settlements in the north German cultural landscape. A plea). Oceano, Schwerin.
  33. Lash S. & Urry J., 1994.Sage, London.
  34. Latour B., 1999.Harvard University Press, Cambridge, London.
  35. Lyotard J.-F., 1979.(The postmodern condition: a report on knowledge). Les Éditions de Minuit, Paris.
  36. Maturana H. & Varela F., 1987.Shambhala, Boston.
  37. Planungsgruppe agl, 2008.(Project proposal of industrial culture landscape North (Saarland)). Ministerium für Umwelt, Saarbrücken.
  38. Schütz A., 1971.(Collected essays. The problem of reality). Nijhoff, Den Haag.
  39. Schütz A., 1972.Northwestern University Press, Evanston.
  40. Simmel G., 1990 (1ed. 1913). Philosophie der Landschaft (Philosophy of landscape). In: Gröning G. & Herlyn U. (eds),Minerva-Publ, München: 67-80.
  41. Sloterdijk P., 1987.(Copernican mobilisation and Ptolemaic disarmament. An aesthetic try). Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.
  42. Sloterdijk P., 1988.University of Minneapolis Press, Minneapolis.
  43. Soja E.W., 2000.Blackwell, Oxford.
  44. Solso R.L., MacLin O.H. & MacLin K., 2008.Pearson, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, Munich.
  45. UNESCO, 2009.Twenty-first session, 25-29 May 2009
  46. Vester H.-G., 1993.(Postmodern sociology). Quintessenz, München.
  47. Welsch W., 1995.(Aesthetic thinking). Reclam, Stuttgart.
  48. Wood G., 2003. Die postmoderne Stadt: Neue Formen der Urbanität im Übergang vom zweiten ins dritte Jahrtausend (The postmodern city: New forms of urbanity in the transition from the second to the third millennium). In: Gebhardt H., Reuber P. & Wolkersdorfer G. (eds),Spektrum, Heidelberg, Berlin: 131-147.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10117-012-0019-3 | Journal eISSN: 2081-6383 | Journal ISSN: 2082-2103 (formerly 0137-477X)
Language: English
Page range: 61 - 70
Published on: Jun 21, 2012
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Related subjects:

© 2012 Olaf Kühne, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.