Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Crossing Disciplinary Borders: Perspectives on Learning About Sustainable Development Cover

Crossing Disciplinary Borders: Perspectives on Learning About Sustainable Development

Open Access
|Jul 2012

References

  1. Aikenhead, G. (2006).New York: Teacher College Press.
  2. Alexandersson, M. (1994). Den fenomenografiska forskningsansatsens fokus [Focus on the phenomenographic research method]. In B. Starrin & P. G. Svensson (Eds.),[Qualitative method and theory of science] (pp. 111-136). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  3. Alexandersson, M. (Ed.). (1998).[Diverging governance. Perspective on school development]. Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet, Institutionen för metodik.
  4. Anderson, C. W. (2007). Perspectives on science learning. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.),(pp. 3-30). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  5. Andersson, B. (2001).[Students' thinking and school science. Findings that provide new ideas]. Stockholm: Allmänna förlaget.
  6. Appleton, K. (2008). Developing science pedagogical content knowledge through mentoring elementary teachers.(6), 523-545.
  7. Arnesen, N. E. (2008). Meaning making from a socio-scientific debate on gene modified food. In A. Macdonald (Ed.),(pp. 15-69). Reykjavik: University of Iceland.
  8. Björneloo, I. (2004).[Meanings of sustainable development]. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
  9. Bäckstrand, K. (2003). Civic science for sustainability. Reframing the role of experts, policymakers and citizens in environmental governance.(4), 24-41.
  10. Carson, R. (1962/2002).New York: Houghton Mifflin.
  11. Clark, F., & Illman, D. L. (2001). Dimensions of civic science.(1), 5-27.
  12. Cullingford, C. (2004). Sustainability and higher education. In J. Blewitt & C. Cullingford (Eds.),(pp. 13-23). London: Earthscan.
  13. Dimenäs, J. (2007).[The main theme in science education]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  14. Englund, T. (2009).Paper presented at Nordic Educational Research Association, Trondheim.
  15. Ernst, J. (2009). Influence on US middle school teachers' use of environment-based education.(1), 71-92.
  16. George, R. (2006). A cross-domain analysis of change in student's attitudes toward science and attitudes about the utility of science.(6), 571-589.
  17. Gutafsson, B. (2007).[Science education for democracy and sustainable development]. Växjö: Växjö universitet.
  18. Gustafsson, B. (2008). Dealing with the democratic aspects in science education. In A. Macdonald (Ed.),(pp. 15-69). Reykjavik: University of Iceland.
  19. Harris, R., & Ratcliffe, M. (2005). Socio-scientific issues and the quality of exploratory talk - what can be learned from schools involved in a ‘collapsed day’ project?(4), 439-453.
  20. Hewitt, P. (2002).Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  21. Johansson, M. (2009). Forskarens ståndpunkt i den fenomenografiska forskningen [Statements in phenomenographic research].[Research in Pedagogy],(1), 45-58.
  22. Jonsson, G. (2007).[An approach full of nuances on pre-service teachers' understanding of and teaching for sustainable development]. Luleå: Luleå tekniska universitet.
  23. Kahne, J. E., & Sporte, S. E. (2008). Developing citizens: The impact of civic learning opportunities on students' commitment to civic participation., 3(45), 738-766.
  24. Kolstö, S. D. (2006). Et allmenndannende naturfag. Fagets betydning for demokratisk deltakelse [The importance of science in democratic processes]., 82-99.
  25. Latour, B. (1987).Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  26. Lewis, J., & Leach, J. (2006). Discussion of socio-scientific issues. The role of science education., 28(11), 1267-1287.
  27. Lindemann-Matthies, P., Constantinou, C., Junge, X., Köhler, K., Mayer, J., Nagel, U., Raper, G., Schüle, D., & Kadji-Beltran, C. (2009). The integration of biodiversity education in the initial education of primary school teachers: Four comparative case studies from Europe., 15(1), 17-37.
  28. Ljunggren, C. (2008). Det offentliga rummets princip. Om kontroversiella frågor i utbildningen [The public discussion about controversial issues in education]., 4(92), 301-314.
  29. Lundegård, I., & Wickman, P. O. (2007). Conflicts of interest: An indispensable element of education for sustainable development., 13(1), 1-15.
  30. Mitchell, J. F. B., Lowe, J., Wood, R. A., & Vellinga, M. (2006). Extreme events due to human induced climate change., 364(1845), 2117-2133.
  31. Nyberg, E. (2009).(Göteborg studies in educational sciences, Nr. 271). Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
  32. Olausson, L. (2005).Vägen bort från den disciplinerade utbildningen - förändringar i den högre utbildningen och ämnesorganisationen [Away from institutional education - changes in higher education and organisation]. In O. Björkqvist, T. Englund, C. Liberg, G. Malmgren, L. Olausson, A. M. Pendrill, S. Selander & S. Sjöberg (Eds.),[The content-oriented teaching and learning] (pp. 8-13). Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
  33. Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008).London: The Nuffield Foundation.
  34. Oscarsson, M., Jidesjö, A., Karlsson, K. G., & Strömdahl, H. (2009). Science in society or science in school: Swedish secondary school science teachers' beliefs about science and science lessons in comparison with what their students want to learn., 5(1), 18-34.
  35. Öhman, J. (2006).[The ethical tendency for education for sustainable development]. Örebro: Örebro University.
  36. Östman, L. (1998). How companion meanings are expressed by science education discourse. In D. A. Roberts & L. Östman (Eds.),(pp. 54-70). New York: Teachers College Press.
  37. Persson, C. (2008).(Studies in Science and Technology Education, Nr. 14). Linköping: Linköping University.
  38. Popov, O. (2008). The place of liberal values in science teacher education. In A. Macdonald (Ed.),(pp. 15-69). Reykjavik: University of Iceland.
  39. Reiska, P., & Dahncke, H. (2008). Handling of natural growth in interdisciplinary science lessons - seeing global problems of environment relevance from the local perspective of students. In A. Macdonald (Ed.),(pp. 15-69). Reykjavik: University of Iceland.
  40. Roberts, D. A. (1998). Analyzing school science courses: The concept of companion meaning. In D. A. Roberts & L. Östman (Eds.),(pp. 5-12). New York: Teachers College Press.
  41. Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.),(pp. 729-780). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  42. Rutherford, F. J. (1990).New York: Oxford University Press.
  43. Sadler, T. D., Amirshokoohi, A., Kazempour, M., & Allspaw, K. M. (2006a). Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms: Teachers perspectives and strategies., 43(4), 353-376.
  44. Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2006b). What do students gain by engaging in socio-scientific inquiry?, 37(4), 371-391.
  45. Sjöberg, S. (2005). Internasjonale skolestudier - Hva kan vi laere og hva kan vi ikke laere? [International school research - what is possible to learn?] In O. Björkqvist, T. Englund, C. Liberg, G. Malmgren, L. Olausson, A. M. Pendrill, S. Selander & S. Sjöberg (Eds.),[The content-oriented teaching and learning] (pp. 53-61). Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
  46. Skolverket [The Swedish National Agency for Education]. (2011).[Curriculum on elementary, kindergarten nursery and leisure home]. Stockholm: Fritzes.
  47. Solhaug, T. (2008). Kritiske blikk på skolens opplaering til demokrati [Critical view on education].[Research in Pedagogy], 4, 255-261.
  48. Solomon, J. (1998). The science curricula of Europe and the notion of scientific culture. In D. A. Roberts & L. Östman (Eds.),(pp. 166-177). New York: Teachers College Press.
  49. Stringer, J. (1992).Suffolk: The Lavenham Press.
  50. Swedish Government Official Reports. (2007).[Inquiry on clear goal-oriented knowledge requirements in primary schools. Clear goal-oriented knowledge requirements in primary schools SGOR 2007: 28]. Sockholm: Fritzes.
  51. Vikström, A. (2005).Unpublished doctoral thesis, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.
  52. World Wide Fund. (2008).Gland: Banson Production.
  53. Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for scientific issues in education., 89(3), 357-377.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10099-012-0001-0 | Journal eISSN: 1691-5534 | Journal ISSN: 1691-4147
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 19
Published on: Jul 13, 2012
Published by: Daugavpils University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2012 Jörgen Dimenäs, Mikael Alexandersson, published by Daugavpils University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.