Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparison Between Active Learning Method and Support Vector Machine for Runoff Modeling Cover

Comparison Between Active Learning Method and Support Vector Machine for Runoff Modeling

Open Access
|Mar 2012

Abstract

In this study Active Learning Method (ALM) as a novel fuzzy modeling approach is compared with optimized Support Vector Machine (SVM) using simple Genetic Algorithm (GA), as a well known datadriven model for long term simulation of daily streamflow in Karoon River. The daily discharge data from 1991 to 1996 and from 1996 to 1999 were utilized for training and testing of the models, respectively. Values of the Nash-Sutcliffe, Bias, R2, MPAE and PTVE of ALM model with 16 fuzzy rules were 0.81, 5.5 m3 s-1, 0.81, 12.9%, and 1.9%, respectively. Following the same order of parameters, these criteria for optimized SVM model were 0.8, -10.7 m3 s-1, 0.81, 7.3%, and -3.6%, respectively. The results show appropriate and acceptable simulation by ALM and optimized SVM. Optimized SVM is a well-known method for runoff simulation and its capabilities have been demonstrated. Therefore, the similarity between ALM and optimized SVM results imply the ability of ALM for runoff modeling. In addition, ALM training is easier and more straightforward than the training of many other data driven models such as optimized SVM and it is able to identify and rank the effective input variables for the runoff modeling. According to the results of ALM simulation and its abilities and properties, it has merit to be introduced as a new modeling method for the runoff modeling.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10098-012-0002-7 | Journal eISSN: 1338-4333 | Journal ISSN: 0042-790X
Language: English
Page range: 16 - 32
Published on: Mar 6, 2012
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2012 Hamid Shahraiyni, Mohammad Ghafouri, Saeed Shouraki, Bahram Saghafian, Mohsen Nasseri, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 60 (2012): Issue 1 (March 2012)