Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Motives in Support of Judicial Activism: Critique and Ethics of Restrained Adjudication as an Alternative Cover

Motives in Support of Judicial Activism: Critique and Ethics of Restrained Adjudication as an Alternative

Baltic Journal of Law & Politics
Volume 2 (2009): Issue 1 (June 2009)
By:   
Open Access
|Sep 2009
Article

Full Article

References

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10076-009-0007-7 | Journal eISSN: 2029-0454
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 112 - 134
Published online: Sep 4, 2009
Published in print: Jan 1, 2009
Published by: Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Judicial activism,
legal interpretation,
Justice John Marshall,
political framework of the state,
restrained adjudication
Related subjects:
Law,
Law, other,
Social sciences,
Political science,
Political science, other

© 2009 Tomas Berkmanas, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 2 (2009): Issue 1 (June 2009)
Previous article
Next article