Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Short communications. eLearning in EFL: Problems and Solutions Cover

Short communications. eLearning in EFL: Problems and Solutions

Psychology of Language and Communication
Volume 15 (2011): Issue 1 (June 2011)
By:   
Open Access
|May 2011
References

References

  1. Bartscherer, P. (1999). The Pew Grant Program in course redesign. Available at:
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Burpee, P. & Wilson, B. (1991). Distance education in the Faculty of Education., Spring, 7-15.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Carpi, A. (2001). Improvements in undergraduate science education using webbased instructional modules: The natural science pages., 1709-1712.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Chrzanowski, J. (2002). Teaching and learning in the online environment: Changing teacher-student relationships online. Paper presented at the Eighth Sloan-C International Conference. November 10. Orlando, FL.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Cravener, P. (1999). Faculty experiences with proving online courses: Thorns among the roses., 17, 42-47.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Dearing, R. (1997).London: HMSO.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. DiPiro, J. T. (1999). The Virtual University - higher education ‘on-line.’, 63, 170-174.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Fessakis, G., Petrou, A., & Dimitracopoulou, A. (2004). Synchronous computer mediated collaborative activities among collocated students: Conditions that make them valuable in every day educational practice. Paper presented at the CSCL SIG First Symposium, October 7-9, Lausanne, Switzerland. Available at: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/19/06/91/PDF/Fessakis-George-2004b.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Firdyiwek, Y. (1999). Web-Based courseware tools: Where is the pedagogy?, January-February, 29-34.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Harasim, L., Calvert, T., & Groenboer, C. (1997). Virtual-U: A Web-based system to support collaborative learning. In B. H. Khan (Ed.),(pp. 149-158). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Hokanson, B., Hooper, S. (2000). Computers as cognitive media: examining the potential of computers in education., 16, 537-552.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Huff, W. D. (2000). Colleges and universities: Survival in the information age., 26, 635-640.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Jackson, G. (1994). Incentives for planning and delivering agricultural distance education., 66, 15-16.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Kearsley, G. (1998). A guide to online education. Available at:
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Kilian, C. (1996). An online writing course. Available at:
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Lee, J. (2001). Instructional support for distance education and faculty motivation, commitment, satisfaction., 32, 153-160.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Littlejohn, A. & Sclater, N. (1998). Overcoming conceptual barriers to the use of internet technology in university education.Available at:
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Mereba, T. (2003). Managing transformation: Aligning technology initiatives with institutional priorities., 47, 42-44.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Milheim, W. (1993). Using computer-based instruction with adult learners., 41, 2-7.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Morgan, G. (2003). Faculty use of course management system.Available at:
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Olcott, D. J. & Wright, S. J. (1995). An institutional support framework for increasing faculty participation in postsecondary distance education., 9, 5-17.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Poling, D. J. (1994). E-mail as an effective teaching supplement., 34, 53-55.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Sliwa, S. (1994). Re-engineering the learning process with information technology., 80, 8-12.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Sosabowski M., Herson K., & Lloyd A. (1998). July. Enhancing learning and teaching quality: integration of networked learning technologies into undergraduate modules., 8, 20-25.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Spratt, C., Palmer, S., & Coldwell, J. (2000). Using technologies in teaching: An initiative in academic staff development., 3, 455-461.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Tearle, P., Dillon, P., & Davies, N. (1999). Use of information technology by English university teachers. Developments and trends at the time of the National Inquiry Into Higher Education., 23, 5-15.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Weisskirch, R. S. & Milburn, S. S. (2003). Virtual discussion: Understanding college students' electronic bulletin board use., 6, 215-225.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Williams, V. & Peters, K. (1997). Faculty incentives for the preparation of webbased instruction. In: B. H. Khan (Ed.),(pp. 107-110). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Wolcott, L. L. (1997). Tenure, promotion and distance education: Examining the culture of faculty rewards., 11, 3-18.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10057-011-0006-0 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8506 (formerly 1234-2238) | Journal ISSN: 1234-2238
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 107 - 116
Published on: May 16, 2011
Published by: Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
EFL,
technology,
Higher Education
Related subjects:
Social sciences,
Psychology,
Applied psychology

© 2011 Fahad Alqurashi, published by Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 15 (2011): Issue 1 (June 2011)
Previous article
Next article