Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Can the Facilitated Communication Method Support Autistic People, According to Facilitators' Opinions? Cover

Can the Facilitated Communication Method Support Autistic People, According to Facilitators' Opinions?

Open Access
|May 2011

References

  1. Airaksinen, T. & Kuusela, A. (1989). Etiikka - hyvän elämän tiede [The Ethics - The science of a good life]. Helsinki: Valtion Painatuskeskus.
  2. Attwood, T. (2001). Foreword. In L. Blackman (Ed.), Lucy's story. Autism and other adventures (pp. 1-4). London: Jessica Kingsley.
  3. Blackman, L. (Ed.) (2001). Lucy's story. Autism and other adventures. London: Jessica Kingsley.
  4. Basler-Eggen, A. (2000). Untersuchungen zur Validität und zu Auswirkungen der Methode der Gestutzten Kommunikation (Facilitated Communication). Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophie an der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munchen.
  5. Bebko, J., Perry, A., & Bryson, S. (1996). Multiple method validation study of facilitated communication: II. Individual differences and subgroup results. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26 (1), 19-43.10.1007/BF02276233
  6. Biklen, D. (1990). Communication unbound: Autism and praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 60 (3), 291-314.10.17763/haer.60.3.013h5022862vu732
  7. Biklen, D., Morton M., Saha, S., Duncan, J., Gold, D., Hardardottir, M., Karna, E., O'Connor, S., & Rao, S. (1991). "I AMN NOT A UTISTIVC ON THJE TYP" ("I'm not autistic on the typewriter"). Disability, Handicap & Society, 6 (3), 161-180.10.1080/02674649166780231
  8. Biklen, D. (1993). Communication unbound. How facilitated communication is challenging traditional views of autism and ability/disability? New York: Teachers College Press.
  9. Biklen, D. (Eds.) (2005a). Autism and the myth of the person alone. New York: New York University Press.
  10. Biklen, D. (2005b). An Introduction to Tito Rajarshi Mukhopadhyay. In D. Biklen (Ed.), Autism and the myth of the person alone (pp. 110-117). New York: New York University Press.
  11. Bogdashina, O. (2004). Communication issues in autism and asperger syndrome: Do we speak the same language? London: Jessica Kingsley.
  12. Bomba, C., O'Donnell, L., Markowitz, C. & Holmes, D. (1996). Evaluating the impact of facilitated communication of fourteen students with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26 (1), 43-59.10.1007/BF02276234
  13. Cabay, M. (1994). Brief report: A controlled evaluation of facilitated communication using open-ended and fill-in questions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24 (4), 517-527.10.1007/BF02172132
  14. Cardinal, D., Hanson, D. & Wakeman, J. (1996). Investigation of authorship in facilitated communication. Mental Retardation, 34 (4), 231-242.
  15. Crossley, R. (1994). Facilitated communication training. New York: Teachers College Press.
  16. Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (1998). The landscape of qualitative research. Theories and issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  17. Duchan, J. (1993). Issues raised by facilitated communication for theorizing and research on autism. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36 (4), 1108-1119.10.1044/jshr.3606.1108
  18. Duchan, J. (1995). The role of experimental research in validating facilitated communication: A reply. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38 (1), 206-210.10.1044/jshr.3801.206
  19. Eberlin, M., McConnachie, G., Ibel, S. & Volpe, L. (1993). Facilitated communication: A failure to replicate the phenomenon. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 23 (3), 507-530.10.1007/BF01046053
  20. Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. (2001). Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen [The basics of qualitative research]. Tampere: Vastapaino.
  21. Fried-Oken, M., Paul, R. & Fay, W. (1995). Questions concerning facilitated communication: Response to Duchan. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38 (1), 200-201.10.1044/jshr.3801.200
  22. Green, G. & Shane, H. (1994). Science, reason, and facilitated communication. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19 (3), 151-172.10.1177/154079699401900302
  23. Haracopos, D. (1988). Hvad med mig? Om autistiske born og unge [What about me? About autistic children and youth]. Allerød: Andonia.
  24. Horner, R. (1994). Invited commentary. Facilitated communication: Keeping it practical. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19 (3), 185-186.
  25. Hudson, A., Melita, B. & Arnold, N. 1993). Brief report: A case study assessing the validity of facilitated communication. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 23 (1), 165-173.
  26. Iversen, P. (2006). Strange son. Two mothers, two sons, and the quest to unlock the hidden world of autism. New York: Penguin.
  27. Janzen-Wilde, M., Duchan, J. & Higginbotham, D. (1995). Successful use of facilitated communication with an oral child. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38 (3), 658-676.10.1044/jshr.3803.658
  28. Järvikoski, A. & Härkäpää, K. (2008). Kuntoutuksen käsityksen muutos ja asiakkuuden muotoutuminen [The change of opinions about rehabilitation] In P. Rissanen, T. Kallanranta, & A. Suikkanen (Eds.), Kuntoutus [Rehabilitation] (pp. 51-62). Helsinki: Duodecim.
  29. Kent-Walsh, J. & McNaughton, D. (2005). Communication partner in AAC: Present practices and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21 (3), 195-204.10.1080/07434610400006646
  30. Kerola, K. & Kujanpää, S. (2000). Kommunikoinnin vaikeuksiin vastaaminen [Answers to difficulties of communication]. In K. Kerola, S. Kujanpää & T. Timonen (Eds.), Autismikuntoutus [The rehabilitation of autism] (pp. 23-46). Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
  31. Kerrin, R. & Murdock, J. (1998). Who is doing the pointing? Investigating facilitated communication in a classroom setting with students with autism. Focus on Autism & Other Developmental Disabilities, 13 (2), 73-80.10.1177/108835769801300202
  32. Kochmeister, S. (1994). Reflections on a year of turmoil and growth. Facilitated Communication Digest, 2 (4), 6-8.
  33. Koivikko, M. & Louhiala, P. (2001). Lasten kuntoutuksen etiikasta [The ethics of rehabilitation of children]. Suomen lääkärilehti [Finnish Medicine Journal], 56 (18), 2047-2050.
  34. Kontu, E. & Rämä, I. (2006). Tuettu kirjoittaminen vuorovaikutuksena [Facilitated writing as interaction]. Erika, Erityisopetuksen tutkimus- ja menetelmätieto [Erika, The Journal of Research of Special Education], University of Jyväskylä, 3, 16-19.
  35. Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews. An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage.
  36. Kvale, S. & Brinkman, S. (2009). Interviews. Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  37. Kärnä-Lin, E. (1993). Facilitated communication - uusi kommunikaatiomenetelmä [Facilitated communication - a new communication method]. The Journal of ISAAC Suomi-Finland, 2.
  38. Kärnä-Lin, E. (1995). Facilitated communication. Erityiskasvatus [The Journal of Special Education], 38 (3), 6-29.
  39. Kärnä-Lin, E. (2003). Oikeus kommunikointiin. Sanansaattaja Joensuun yliopistosta [The right to communicate - message from University of Joensuu]. Joensuun yliopiston tiedotuslehti [Bulletin of University of Joensuu], 9, 2-3.
  40. Kärnä-Lin, E. (2005). Oulun osahanke "Joidenkin kieli on iholle kirjoitettu" [The language may be written on the skin]. In J. Schimkewitsch & K. Launonen (Eds.), Kommunikaatioprojekti 1999-2005. Loppuraportti. Autismi- ja Aspergerliiton julkaisuj [Communication-project 1999-2005. The Reports of the Autism and Asperger Association], 1, 28-43.
  41. Kärnä-Lin, E. (2006). Aineistolähtöinen analyysi ja grounded theory-menetelmän soveltaminen tutkimuksessa [How to apply grounded theory methods and databasis analysis]. In K. Ruoho (Ed.), Tehtävänä erityispedagoginen näkökulma. Tutkimusta erityiskasvatuksen laitoksella [The perspective of special education. The reports of Faculty of Education]. Joensuu: Joensuun yliopisto.
  42. Latomaa, T. (1994). Pedagogiikan paradoksi - kasvatus sosiaalisena toimintana [Paradoxical pedagogy]. Kasvatus [Education], 25 (1), 66-71.
  43. Launonen, K. (2005). Näkökulmia tuettuun kommunikoinnin harjoittelutekniikkaan [Perspectives to praxis of facilitated communication]. Puheterapeutti [Speech Therapist], 1, 4-8.
  44. Levine, K., Shane, H. & Wharton, R. (1994). What If…: A plea to professionals to consider the risk ratio of facilitated communication. Mental Retardation, 32 (4), 300-304.
  45. Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  46. Lindqvist, M. (1985). Ammattina ihminen [To be a human being as a profession]. Helsinki: Otava.
  47. Marcus, E., Shevin, M. (1997). Sorting it out under fire: Our journey. In D. Biklen & D. Cardinal (Eds.), Contested words, contested science. Unravelling the facilitated communication controversy (pp. 115-134). New York: Teachers College Press.
  48. Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography: A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21 (3), 28-49.
  49. Marton, F. & Booth S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  50. Mirenda, P. (2008). A back door approach to autism and AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24 (3), 220-234.10.1080/08990220802388263
  51. Moore, S., Donovan, B., Hudson, A., Dykstra, J., & Lawrence, J. (1993). Brief report: Evaluation of eight case studies of facilitated communication. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 23 (3), 531-552.10.1007/BF01046054
  52. Mostert, M. (2001). Facilitated communication since 1995: A review of published studies. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31 (3), 287-313.10.1023/A:1010795219886
  53. Mukhopadhyay, T. (2000). Beyond the silence: My life, the world and autism. London: National Autistic Society.
  54. Mukhopadhyay, T. (2003). The Mind Tree. New York: Arcade.
  55. Niemi, J. & Kärnä-Lin, E. (2002). Grammar and lexicon in facilitated communication: A linguistic authorship analysis of a Finnish case. Mental Retardation, 40 (5), 347-357.10.1352/0047-6765(2002)040<;0347:GALIFC>2.0.CO;2
  56. Niemi, J. & Kärnä-Lin, E. (2003a. Four vantage points to the language performance and capacity of human beings: Response to Saloviita and Sariola. Mental Retardation, 41 (5), 380-385.10.1352/0047-6765(2003)41<;380:FVPTTL>2.0.CO;2
  57. Niemi, J. & Kärnä-Lin, E. (2003b. Whose mind/language is closer to the keyboard? Response to Strumey. Mental Retardation, 41 (5), 386 - 387.10.1352/0047-6765(2003)41<;387:WLICTT>2.0.CO;2
  58. Niikko, A. (2003). Fenomenografia kasvatustieteellisessä tutkimuksessa [Phenomenography in educational research] (Research reports of University of Joensuu, Faculty of Education 85). Joensuu: Joensuun yliopisto.
  59. Ojalammi, U. & Leppänen, M. (2005). Fasilitointi - faktaa, fiktioita vai filunkia [Facilitation - Fact, fiction or cheating] (Pro gradu-thesis. Special education in Faculty of Education. University of Jyväskylä). Retrieved 10.12.2008 from: http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-2005241
  60. Olney, M. (1997). A controlled study of facilitated communication using computer games. In D. Biklen & D. Cardinal (Eds.), Contested words, contested science. Unravelling the facilitated communication controversy (pp. 96-114). New York: Teachers College Press.
  61. Otter, L. & Masefield, E. (2001). Facilitated communication at the Chinnor Resource Unit. A journey. In J. Richter & S. Coates (Eds.), Autism - The search for coherence (pp. 152-175). London: Jessica Kingsley.
  62. Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. London: Sage.
  63. Paul, J., French P., & Cranston-Gingras, A. (2001). Ethics and special education. Focus on Exceptional Children, 34 (1), 1-16.
  64. Pilvang, M. (2002). Facilitated communication in Denmark. Retrieved 12.04.2008 from: http://www.fc2000.dk
  65. Regal, R., Rooney, J., & Wandas, T. (1994). Facilitated communication: An Experimental evaluation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24 (3), 345-355.10.1007/BF02172232
  66. Robson, C. (1993). Real world research. A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Oxford: Blackwell.
  67. Räsänen, R. (1993). Opettajan etiikkaa etsimässä. Opettajan etiikka-opintojakson kehittelyprosessi toimintatutkimuksena opettajankoulutuksessa [Searching for the ethics of teaching] (Acta Universitatis Ouluensis series E. Scientiae rerum socialum 12). Doctoral Dissertation. University of Oulu.
  68. Sabin, L. & Donnellan, A. (1993). A qualitative study of the process of facilitated communication. Journal of the Association of Persons with Severe Handicaps, 18 (3), 200-211.10.1177/154079699301800306
  69. Sajaniemi, N. (2007). Onko tiedeyhteisössä luovaa uteliaisuutta - torjua vai tutkia? [Is there creative curiosity in the science community?]. Kasvatus [Education], 38 (1), 70-72.
  70. Saloviita, T. & Sariola, H. (2003). Authorship in facilitated communication: A reanalysis of case of assumed representative authentic writing. Mental Retardation, 41 (5), 374-379.10.1352/0047-6765(2003)41<;374:AIFCAR>2.0.CO;2
  71. Shane, H. & Kearns, K. (1994). An examination of the role of the facilitator in "Facilitated communication". American Journal of Speech-language Pathology, 3 (3), 48-54.10.1044/1058-0360.0303.48
  72. Sheehan, C. & Matuozzi, R. (1996). Investigation of the validity of facilitated communication through the disclosure of unknown information. Mental Retardation, 34 (2), 94-107.
  73. Silliman, E. (1995). Issues raised by facilitated communication for theorizing and research on autism: Comments on Duchan's (1993) tutorial. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38 (1), 204-206.10.1044/jshr.3801.204
  74. Silverman, D. (2005). Doing qualitative research. Practical handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  75. Simon, E., Whitehair, P., & Toll, D. (1996). A case study: Follow-up assessment of facilitated communication. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26 (1), 9-19.10.1007/BF02276232
  76. Szempruch, J. & Jacobson, J. (1993). Evaluating facilitated communications of people with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disorders, 14 (4), 253-264.10.1016/0891-4222(93)90020-K
  77. Tuomi, J. & Sarajärvi, A. (2002). Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi [Qualitative research and content analysis]. Helsinki: Tammi.
  78. Tuzzi, A., Cemin, M., & Castanga, M. (2004). "Moved deeply I am". Autistic language in texts produced with FC. Journees internationals d'Analyse statistique des Donnees Textuelleds, 7, 1-9.
  79. Tuzzi, A. (2009). Grammar and lexicon in individuals with autism: A quantitative analysis of Large Italian Corpus. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47 (5), 373-385.10.1352/1934-9556-47.5.373
  80. Tynjälä, P. (1991). Kvalitatiivisten tutkimusmenetelmien luotettavuudesta [The reliability of quantitative research methods]. Kasvatus [Education], 22 (5-6), 387-398.
  81. Uljens, M. (1991). Phenomenography - Qualitative approach in educational research. In L. Syrjälä & J. Merenheimo (Eds.). Kasvatustutkimuksen laadullisia lähestymistapoja [The qualitative perspective of science of education] (pp. 80-107). Oulu: Oulun yliopisto.
  82. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  83. Wurzburg, G. (2004). Autism is a world (Documentary). Washington, DC: State of the Art.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10057-011-0001-5 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8506 | Journal ISSN: 1234-2238
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 26
Published on: May 16, 2011
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2011 Anna-Kaisa Sipilä, Kaarina Määttä, published by Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 15 (2011): Issue 1 (June 2011)