Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Can the Facilitated Communication Method Support Autistic People, According to Facilitators' Opinions? Cover

Can the Facilitated Communication Method Support Autistic People, According to Facilitators' Opinions?

Psychology of Language and Communication
Volume 15 (2011): Issue 1 (June 2011)
By:  and    
Open Access
|May 2011
References

References

  1. Airaksinen, T. & Kuusela, A. (1989).[]. Helsinki: Valtion Painatuskeskus.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Attwood, T. (2001). Foreword. In L. Blackman (Ed.),(pp. 1-4). London: Jessica Kingsley.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Blackman, L. (Ed.) (2001).London: Jessica Kingsley.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Basler-Eggen, A. (2000).Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophie an der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munchen.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Bebko, J., Perry, A., & Bryson, S. (1996). Multiple method validation study of facilitated communication: II. Individual differences and subgroup results., 26 (1), 19-43.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Biklen, D. (1990). Communication unbound: Autism and praxis., 60 (3), 291-314.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Biklen, D., Morton M., Saha, S., Duncan, J., Gold, D., Hardardottir, M., Karna, E., O'Connor, S., & Rao, S. (1991). "I AMN NOT A UTISTIVC ON THJE TYP" ("I'm not autistic on the typewriter")., 6 (3), 161-180.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Biklen, D. (1993).New York: Teachers College Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Biklen, D. (Eds.) (2005a).New York: New York University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Biklen, D. (2005b). An Introduction to Tito Rajarshi Mukhopadhyay. In D. Biklen (Ed.),(pp. 110-117). New York: New York University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Bogdashina, O. (2004).London: Jessica Kingsley.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Bomba, C., O'Donnell, L., Markowitz, C. & Holmes, D. (1996). Evaluating the impact of facilitated communication of fourteen students with autism., 26 (1), 43-59.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Cabay, M. (1994). Brief report: A controlled evaluation of facilitated communication using open-ended and fill-in questions., 24 (4), 517-527.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Cardinal, D., Hanson, D. & Wakeman, J. (1996). Investigation of authorship in facilitated communication., 34 (4), 231-242.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Crossley, R. (1994).New York: Teachers College Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (1998).Theories and issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Duchan, J. (1993). Issues raised by facilitated communication for theorizing and research on autism., 36 (4), 1108-1119.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Duchan, J. (1995). The role of experimental research in validating facilitated communication: A reply., 38 (1), 206-210.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Eberlin, M., McConnachie, G., Ibel, S. & Volpe, L. (1993). Facilitated communication: A failure to replicate the phenomenon., 23 (3), 507-530.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. (2001).[]. Tampere: Vastapaino.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Fried-Oken, M., Paul, R. & Fay, W. (1995). Questions concerning facilitated communication: Response to Duchan., 38 (1), 200-201.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Green, G. & Shane, H. (1994). Science, reason, and facilitated communication., 19 (3), 151-172.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Haracopos, D. (1988).[]. Allerød: Andonia.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Horner, R. (1994). Invited commentary. Facilitated communication: Keeping it practical., 19 (3), 185-186.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Hudson, A., Melita, B. & Arnold, N. 1993). Brief report: A case study assessing the validity of facilitated communication., 23 (1), 165-173.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Iversen, P. (2006).New York: Penguin.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Janzen-Wilde, M., Duchan, J. & Higginbotham, D. (1995). Successful use of facilitated communication with an oral child., 38 (3), 658-676.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Järvikoski, A. & Härkäpää, K. (2008). Kuntoutuksen käsityksen muutos ja asiakkuuden muotoutuminen [The change of opinions about rehabilitation] In P. Rissanen, T. Kallanranta, & A. Suikkanen (Eds.),[] (pp. 51-62). Helsinki: Duodecim.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Kent-Walsh, J. & McNaughton, D. (2005). Communication partner in AAC: Present practices and future directions., 21 (3), 195-204.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Kerola, K. & Kujanpää, S. (2000). Kommunikoinnin vaikeuksiin vastaaminen [Answers to difficulties of communication]. In K. Kerola, S. Kujanpää & T. Timonen (Eds.),[] (pp. 23-46). Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Kerrin, R. & Murdock, J. (1998). Who is doing the pointing? Investigating facilitated communication in a classroom setting with students with autism., 13 (2), 73-80.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Kochmeister, S. (1994). Reflections on a year of turmoil and growth., 2 (4), 6-8.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Koivikko, M. & Louhiala, P. (2001). Lasten kuntoutuksen etiikasta [The ethics of rehabilitation of children].[], 56 (18), 2047-2050.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Kontu, E. & Rämä, I. (2006). Tuettu kirjoittaminen vuorovaikutuksena [Facilitated writing as interaction].[], University of Jyväskylä, 3, 16-19.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Kvale, S. (1996).London: Sage.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Kvale, S. & Brinkman, S. (2009).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Kärnä-Lin, E. (1993). Facilitated communication - uusi kommunikaatiomenetelmä [Facilitated communication - a new communication method]., 2.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Kärnä-Lin, E. (1995). Facilitated communication.[], 38 (3), 6-29.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Kärnä-Lin, E. (2003). Oikeus kommunikointiin. Sanansaattaja Joensuun yliopistosta [The right to communicate - message from University of Joensuu].[], 9, 2-3.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Kärnä-Lin, E. (2005). Oulun osahanke "Joidenkin kieli on iholle kirjoitettu" [The language may be written on the skin]. In J. Schimkewitsch & K. Launonen (Eds.),[], 1, 28-43.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Kärnä-Lin, E. (2006). Aineistolähtöinen analyysi ja grounded theory-menetelmän soveltaminen tutkimuksessa [How to apply grounded theory methods and databasis analysis]. In K. Ruoho (Ed.),[]. Joensuu: Joensuun yliopisto.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Latomaa, T. (1994). Pedagogiikan paradoksi - kasvatus sosiaalisena toimintana [Paradoxical pedagogy].[], 25 (1), 66-71.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Launonen, K. (2005). Näkökulmia tuettuun kommunikoinnin harjoittelutekniikkaan [Perspectives to praxis of facilitated communication].[], 1, 4-8.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Levine, K., Shane, H. & Wharton, R. (1994). What If…: A plea to professionals to consider the risk ratio of facilitated communication., 32 (4), 300-304.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (1985).Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Lindqvist, M. (1985).[]. Helsinki: Otava.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Marcus, E., Shevin, M. (1997). Sorting it out under fire: Our journey. In D. Biklen & D. Cardinal (Eds.),(pp. 115-134). New York: Teachers College Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography: A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality., 21 (3), 28-49.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Marton, F. & Booth S. (1997).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Mirenda, P. (2008). A back door approach to autism and AAC., 24 (3), 220-234.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  51. Moore, S., Donovan, B., Hudson, A., Dykstra, J., & Lawrence, J. (1993). Brief report: Evaluation of eight case studies of facilitated communication., 23 (3), 531-552.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  52. Mostert, M. (2001). Facilitated communication since 1995: A review of published studies., 31 (3), 287-313.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  53. Mukhopadhyay, T. (2000).London: National Autistic Society.
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. Mukhopadhyay, T. (2003).New York: Arcade.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. Niemi, J. & Kärnä-Lin, E. (2002). Grammar and lexicon in facilitated communication: A linguistic authorship analysis of a Finnish case., 40 (5), 347-357.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  56. Niemi, J. & Kärnä-Lin, E. (2003a. Four vantage points to the language performance and capacity of human beings: Response to Saloviita and Sariola., 41 (5), 380-385.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  57. Niemi, J. & Kärnä-Lin, E. (2003b. Whose mind/language is closer to the keyboard? Response to Strumey., 41 (5), 386 - 387.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  58. Niikko, A. (2003).[] (Research reports of University of Joensuu, Faculty of Education 85). Joensuu: Joensuun yliopisto.
    Search in Google Scholar
  59. Ojalammi, U. & Leppänen, M. (2005). Fasilitointi - faktaa, fiktioita vai filunkia [Facilitation - Fact, fiction or cheating] (Pro gradu-thesis. Special education in Faculty of Education. University of Jyväskylä). Retrieved 10.12.2008 from:
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. Olney, M. (1997). A controlled study of facilitated communication using computer games. In D. Biklen & D. Cardinal (Eds.),(pp. 96-114). New York: Teachers College Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  61. Otter, L. & Masefield, E. (2001). Facilitated communication at the Chinnor Resource Unit. A journey. In J. Richter & S. Coates (Eds.),(pp. 152-175). London: Jessica Kingsley.
    Search in Google Scholar
  62. Patton, M. (1990).London: Sage.
    Search in Google Scholar
  63. Paul, J., French P., & Cranston-Gingras, A. (2001). Ethics and special education., 34 (1), 1-16.
    Search in Google Scholar
  64. Pilvang, M. (2002). Facilitated communication in Denmark. Retrieved 12.04.2008 from:
    Search in Google Scholar
  65. Regal, R., Rooney, J., & Wandas, T. (1994). Facilitated communication: An Experimental evaluation., 24 (3), 345-355.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  66. Robson, C. (1993).Oxford: Blackwell.
    Search in Google Scholar
  67. Räsänen, R. (1993).[] (Acta Universitatis Ouluensis series E. Scientiae rerum socialum 12). Doctoral Dissertation. University of Oulu.
    Search in Google Scholar
  68. Sabin, L. & Donnellan, A. (1993). A qualitative study of the process of facilitated communication., 18 (3), 200-211.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  69. Sajaniemi, N. (2007). Onko tiedeyhteisössä luovaa uteliaisuutta - torjua vai tutkia? [Is there creative curiosity in the science community?].[], 38 (1), 70-72.
    Search in Google Scholar
  70. Saloviita, T. & Sariola, H. (2003). Authorship in facilitated communication: A reanalysis of case of assumed representative authentic writing., 41 (5), 374-379.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  71. Shane, H. & Kearns, K. (1994). An examination of the role of the facilitator in "Facilitated communication"., 3 (3), 48-54.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  72. Sheehan, C. & Matuozzi, R. (1996). Investigation of the validity of facilitated communication through the disclosure of unknown information., 34 (2), 94-107.
    Search in Google Scholar
  73. Silliman, E. (1995). Issues raised by facilitated communication for theorizing and research on autism: Comments on Duchan's (1993) tutorial., 38 (1), 204-206.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  74. Silverman, D. (2005).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Search in Google Scholar
  75. Simon, E., Whitehair, P., & Toll, D. (1996). A case study: Follow-up assessment of facilitated communication., 26 (1), 9-19.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  76. Szempruch, J. & Jacobson, J. (1993). Evaluating facilitated communications of people with developmental disabilities., 14 (4), 253-264.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  77. Tuomi, J. & Sarajärvi, A. (2002).[]. Helsinki: Tammi.
    Search in Google Scholar
  78. Tuzzi, A., Cemin, M., & Castanga, M. (2004). "Moved deeply I am". Autistic language in texts produced with FC., 7, 1-9.
    Search in Google Scholar
  79. Tuzzi, A. (2009). Grammar and lexicon in individuals with autism: A quantitative analysis of Large Italian Corpus., 47 (5), 373-385.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  80. Tynjälä, P. (1991). Kvalitatiivisten tutkimusmenetelmien luotettavuudesta [The reliability of quantitative research methods].[], 22 (5-6), 387-398.
    Search in Google Scholar
  81. Uljens, M. (1991). Phenomenography - Qualitative approach in educational research. In L. Syrjälä & J. Merenheimo (Eds.).[] (pp. 80-107). Oulu: Oulun yliopisto.
    Search in Google Scholar
  82. Vygotsky, L. (1978).Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  83. Wurzburg, G. (2004).Washington, DC: State of the Art.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10057-011-0001-5 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8506 (formerly 1234-2238) | Journal ISSN: 1234-2238
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 26
Published on: May 16, 2011
Published by: Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
facilitated communication,
autism,
facilitation,
facilitator,
AAC methods
Related subjects:
Social sciences,
Psychology,
Applied psychology

© 2011 Anna-Kaisa Sipilä, Kaarina Määttä, published by Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 15 (2011): Issue 1 (June 2011)
Next article