Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Impact of Audio Information Intonation on Understanding Television News Content Cover

The Impact of Audio Information Intonation on Understanding Television News Content

Psychology of Language and Communication
Volume 14 (2010): Issue 1 (June 2010)
By:   
Open Access
|Jun 2010
References

References

  1. Beach, C. M. (1991). The interpretation of prosodic patterns at points of syntactic structure ambiguity: Evidence for cue trading relations., 30, 644-663.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Brosius, H. B. (1989). Influence of presentation features and news content on learning from television news., 33, 1-14.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Cutler, A., Dahan, D., & van Donselaar, W. (1997). Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: a literature review., 40, 141-201.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. DeFleur, M. L. & Ball-Rokeach, S. (1989).White Plains, NY: Longman.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Diehl, R. L., Lotto, A. J., & Holt, L. L. (2004). Speech perception., 55, 149-179.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Dłuska, M. (1976).[Polish language prosody]. Warszawa: PWN.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Drew, D. G. & Grimes, T. (1987). Audio-visual redundancy and TV news recall., 14, 452-461.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Ferreira, F. (1993. The creation of prosody during sentence production., 100, 233-253.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Ferreira, F. (2002). Prosody. In L. Nadel (Ed.),(pp. 258-265). London, U. K.: Macmillan Reference Ltd.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Ferreira, F. (2007). Prosody and performance in language production., 22, 1151-1177.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Ferreira, F., Christianson, K., & Hollingworth, A. (2001). Misinterpretations of garden-path sentences: Implications for models of sentence processing and reanalysis., 30, 3-20.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Francuz, P. (2002).[Understanding television message. Psychological research on television news programs]. Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Francuz, P. (2006). Czy ludzie mają trudności ze zrozumieniem telewizyjnych programów informacyjnych? [Do people have difficulty understanding television news programs?]., 1, 7-14.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Francuz, P., Fortuna, P., Szalkowska, A., Szubielska, M., & Bagiński, D. (2004).Raport z badań opracowany dla Biura Programowego Telewizji Polskiej TVP SA [Unpublished research report prepared for the Department of Program Analyses of the Polish Television TVP SA]. Warszawa.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Graber, D. A. (1984).New York: Longman.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Graber, D. A. (1990). Seeing is remembering: How visuals contribute to learning from television news., 40, 134-155.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Greenberg, S. & Ainsworth, W. A. (2004). Speech processing in the auditory system: An overview. In S. Greenberg, W. A. Ainsworth, A. N. Popper, & R. R. Fay (Eds.),(pp. 1-62). New York: Springer.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Gunter, B. (1979). Recall of brief television news items: Effects of presentation mode, picture content and serial position., 5, 57-61.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Gunter, B. (1980). Remembering television news: Effects of picture content., 102, 127-133.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Gunter, B. (1987).Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Iyengar S. & Kinder D. R. (1987).Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Jun, S.-A. (2003). Intonation. In L. Nadel (Ed.),(pp. 618-624). London: Nature Publishing Group.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Kintsch, W. & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production., 85, 363-396.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Lang, A. (1989). The effects of chronological presentation of information on processing and memory for broadcast news., 33, 441-452.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Lang, A. (1995). Defining audio/video redundancy from a limited capacity information processing perspective., 22, 86-115.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing., 50, 46-70.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Lang, A., Geiger, S., Strickwerda, M., & Sumner, J. (1993). The effects of related and unrelated cuts on viewers memory for television: A limited capacity theory of television viewing., 20, 4-29.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Lau, E. & Ferreira, F. (2005). Lingering effects of disfluent material on comprehension of garden path sentences., 20, 633-666.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. Palmer, C. & Hutchins, S. (2006). What is musical prosody? In B. H. Ross (Ed.),(pp. 245-278). Amsterdam: Elsevier Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Pierrehumbert, J. & Hirschberg, J. (1990). The meaning of intonational contours and the interpretation of discourse. In P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan, & M. E. Pollack (Ed.),(pp. 271-312). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Potter, R., Lang, A., & Boils, P. (1997). Orienting responses to structural features of media., 34, 572.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Robinson, J. P. & Davis, D. K. (1990). Television news and the informed public: An information processing approach., 40, 106-119.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Shapiro M. A. & Lang A. (1991). Making television reality. Unconscious processes in the construction of social reality., 18, 685-705.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Snedeker, J. & Trueswell, J. (2003). Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context., 48, 103-130.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. Speer, S. R., Crowder, R. G. & Thomas, L. M. (1993). Prosodic structure and sentence recognition., 32, 336-358.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  36. van Dijk, T. (1980).Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. van Dijk, T. (1997). The study of discourse. In T. van Dijk (Ed.),(pp. 1-34). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Wober, J. M., Brosius, H. B., & Weinmann, C. (1996). The European election of 1989: British television viewers' knowledge, attitudes and voting behaviour., 35, 233-244.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10057-010-0005-6 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8506 (formerly 1234-2238) | Journal ISSN: 1234-2238
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 71 - 86
Published on: Jun 7, 2010
Published by: Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
prosody,
understanding audiovisual message,
television news programs
Related subjects:
Social sciences,
Psychology,
Applied psychology

© 2010 Piotr Francuz, published by Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 14 (2010): Issue 1 (June 2010)
Previous article
Next article