Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Does the Development of Alternative Energy Technologies Allow for New Forms of Coopetition? Cover

Does the Development of Alternative Energy Technologies Allow for New Forms of Coopetition?

Organizacija
Volume 45 (2012): Issue 2 (March 2012)
By: Ante Galich and  Lutz Marz  
Open Access
|Apr 2012

References

  1. Bell, G. G. (2005). Clusters, Networks and Firm Innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal. 26(3), 287-295. DOI: 10.1002/smj.44810.1002/smj.448
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Bengtsson, M. & Kock, S. (2000). »Coopetition» in Business Networks - to Cooperate and Compete Simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management. 29(5), 411-426. DOI: 10.1016/S0019-8501(99)00067-X10.1016/S0019-8501(99)00067-X
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. BMU (Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety). (2008). Die dritte industrielle Revolution - Aufbruch in ein ökologisches Jahrhundert. Dimensionen und Herausforderungen des industriellen und gesellschaftlichen Wandels. Berlin: German Government Publishing Service
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. BMVBS (Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Development), BMBF (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) & BMWi (Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology). (2011). Nationaler Entwicklungsplan. Version 3.0 zum Innovationsprogramm Wasserstoff- und Brennstoffzellentechnologie. Berlin: German Government Publishing Service
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. BMW (Bayerische Motorenwerke). (2008). H2. Mobility of the Future. Retrieved December 18, 2010, Retriewed from http://www.bmwgroup.com/bmwgroup_prod/bmw_H2_Mobilitaet_Zukunft_gesamt_e.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Bossel, U. (2006). Wasserstoff löst keine Energieprobleme. Technologiefolgenabschätzung. Theorie und Praxis. 15(1), 26-33.10.14512/tatup.15.1.27
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Canzler, W. & Marz, L. (2011). Wert und Verwertung neuer Technologien. Leviathan. 39(2), 223-245. DOI: 10.1007/s11578-011-0116-z10.1007/s11578-011-0116-z
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. CEP (Clean Energy Partnership). (2007). Report 2002-2007. Berlin: Clean Energy Partnership
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. CEP (Clean Energy Partnership). (2009). Clean Energy Partnership. Mobil mit Wasserstoff. Berlin: Clean Energy Partnership
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Council of the European Union. (2008). Regulations. Council Regulation (EC) No 521/2008 of 30 May 2008 setting up the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Union
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Dagnino, G. B. & Padula, G. (2002). Coopetition Strategy. A New Kind Of Interfirm Dynamics For Value Creation. In Innovative Research in Management, 9-11 May 2002 (pp. 1-32). Stockholm
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Asendorpf, D. (2004). Die Mär vom Wasserstoff. Die Zeit. (2004, October 7). pp. 1-4
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Dierkes, M., Marz, L. & Aigle, T. (2009). »Die automobile Wende. Analyse einer Innovationslandschaft«. In: R. Popp & E. Schüll (Eds.), Zukunftsforschung und Zukunftsgestaltung. Beiträge aus Wissenschaft und Praxis (pp. 323-340). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer10.1007/978-3-540-78564-4_25
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. DOE (US Department of Energy). (2001). Proceedings. National Hydrogen Vision Meeting. Washington: U. S. Government Publishing Service
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. DOE (US Department of Energy). (2002). A National Visions Of America's Transition To A Hydrogen Economy. To 2030 And Beyond, Based on the results of the National Hydrogen Vision Meeting. Washington: U. S. Government Publishing Service
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. EC (European Commission). (2002). Commission to launch High Level Group on Hydrogen and Fuel Cell technologies. Retrieved August 12, 2010, from http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/02/1282&format=HTML&aged=1&language=EN&guiLanguage=en10.1016/S1464-2859(02)11001-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. EC (European Commission). (2004). Hydrogen economy: New EU hydrogen and fuel cell Quick Start initiative, Retrieved August 14, 2010, from http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/04/363&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. FCFP (FreedomCAR and Fuel Partnership). (2006). Partnership Plan. FreedomCAR & Fuel Partnership. Washington: U. S. Government Publishing Service
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. FCH JU (Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking). (2009). Multi - Annual Implementation Plan 2008 - 2013. Brussels: Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. FCH JU (Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking). 2010. Members of the FCH JU Scientific Committee. Retrieved August 11, 2010, from http://ec.europa.eu/research/fch/pdf/fch_ju_scientific_committee.pdf#view=fit&pagemode=none
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Fuel Cell Alliance. (2006). Bericht zum parlamentarischen Abend in der Landesvertretung Niedersachsen in Berlin. Wasserstoff- und Brennstoffzellentechnologien - Deutschland quo vadis? Berlin: Fuel Cell Alliance
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Gilsing, V. A., Lemmens, C. E. A. V. & Duysters, G. (2007). Strategic Alliance Networks and Innovation: A Deterministic and Voluntaristic View Combined. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19(2), 227-249. DOI: 10.1080/0953732060116815110.1080/09537320601168151
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Gomes-Casseres, B., Hagedoorn, J. & Jaffe, A. B. (2006). Do alliances promote knowledge flows? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(1), 5-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.08.01110.1016/j.jfineco.2004.08.011
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. HFP (Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technology Platform). (2004a). First Meeting of the Executive Group. Brussels: Platform Secretariat. (EHP-EG 2/2004 Rev.1)
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. HFP (Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technology Platform). (2004b). European Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technology Platform. Advisory Council. Retrieved August 11, 2010, from http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/rtd/eurhydrofuelcellplat/library?l=/publicsarea/advisoryscouncil/acslists121203pdf/_EN_1.0_&a=d
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. HFP (European Hydrogen & Fuel Cell Technology Platform). (2005a). European Hydrogen & Fuel Cell Technology Platform. Strategic Research Agenda. Brussels: Platform Secretariat10.1016/S1464-2859(05)00591-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. HFP (European Hydrogen & Fuel Cell Technology Platform). (2005b). European Hydrogen & Fuel Cell Technology Platform. Deployment Strategy. Brussels: Platform Secretariat10.1016/S1464-2859(05)00591-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. HLG (High Level Group). (2003). Hydrogen Energy and Fuel Cells. A vision of our future, Final Report of the High Level Group. Brussels: European Commission Publishing Service. (EUR 20719 EN)
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Hughes, T. P. (1993). Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930. Baltimore, London: The John Hopkins University Press
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Hughes, T. P. & Mayntz, R. (1988). The Development of Large Technical Systems. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Marz, L. & Krstacic-Galic, A. (2010). Wert-volle Visionen. Die Bedeutung von Leitbildern in Wertgebungsprozessen der Wasserstoff- und Brennstoffzellentechnologie. Discussion Paper SP III 2010-404. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. NEPDG (National Energy Policy Development Group). (2001). National Energy Policy. Report of the National Energy Policy Development Group. Washington: U. S. Government Printing Office
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. NOW (National Organization Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technology). (2009). Die Clean Energy Partnership. Übergeordnete Module, Nationale Organisation Wasserstoff- und Brennstoffzellentechnologie. Retrieved December 15, 2010, from http://www.now-gmbh.de/uploads/tx_goprojektfinder/NIP_CEP_091217.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. NOW (National Organization Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technology). (2010). Preparing the Market. Retrieved November 20, 2010, from http://www.now-gmbh.de/en/now/who-we-are/functions.html
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. NOW (Nationale Organisation Wasserstoff- und Brennstoff-zellentechnologie). (2011). Homepage. Aufgaben. Retrieved February 2, 2011, from http://www.now-gmbh.de/index.php?id=21&L=1﹨﹨﹨%27
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Peng, T.-J. A., Pike, S., Yang, J. C.-H. & Roos, G. (2011). Is Cooperation with Competitors a Good Idea? An Example in Practice. British Journal of Management. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00781.x10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00781.x
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. Provan, K. G., Fisch, A. & Sydow, J. (2007). Interorganizational networks at the network level: a review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of Management. 33(3), 479-516. DOI: 10.1177/014920630730255410.1177/0149206307302554
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. Rifkin, J. (2003). The Hydrogen Economy. The Creation Of The Worldwide Energy Web And The Redistribution Of Power On Earth. The Next Great Economic Revolution. Tarcher
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Ritala, P. & Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. (2009). What's in it for me? Creating and appropriating value in innovation-related coopetition. Technovation. 29(12), 819-828. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.03.03110.1016/j.bbr.2011.03.031
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. Schilling, M. A. & Phelps, C. C. (2007). Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation. Management Science. 53(7), 1113-1126. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.062410.1287/mnsc.1060.0624
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  41. Sroka W. (2010). Alliance Networks: the Case of Multinational Corporations. Organizacija. 43(4), 165-172. DOI: 10.2478/v10051-010-0016-z10.2478/v10051-010-0016-z
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  42. Sroka, W. (2011). Problem of Trust in Alliance Networks. Organizacija. 44(4), 101-108. DOI: 10.2478/v10051-011-0010-010.2478/v10051-011-0010-0
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. TES (Transport Energy Strategy). (2000). Statusbericht der Task-Force an das Steering-Committee. Unpublished report
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. TES (Transport Energy Strategy). (2001). Zweiter Statusbericht der Task-Force an das Steering-Committee. Retrieved November 30, 2010, from http://www.bmvbs.de/cae/servlet/contentblob/30514/publicationFile/1155/zwischenbericht-2001.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. TÜV-SÜD. (2012). Tata Starbus Fuel Cell (hydrogen) (2012). Retrieved February 19, 2012, from http://www.netinform.net/H2/H2Mobility/Default.aspx
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Van Vliet, O., van den Broek, M., Turkenburg, W. & Faaij, A. (2011). Combining hybrid cars and synthetic fuels with electricity generation and carbon capture and storage. Energy Policy. 39(1), 248-268. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.09.03810.1016/j.enpol.2010.09.038
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  47. WBGU (German Advisory Council on Global Change). (2003). Welt im Wandel: Energiewende zur Nachhaltigkeit. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10051-012-0006-4 | Journal eISSN: 1581-1832 | Journal ISSN: 1318-5454
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 50 - 58
Published on: Apr 3, 2012
Published by: University of Maribor
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
hydrogen and fuel cells,
coopetition
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Business management,
Management, organization, corporate governance

© 2012 Ante Galich, Lutz Marz, published by University of Maribor
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 45 (2012): Issue 2 (March 2012)