References
- Ågren J. (2004) Regional geoid determination methods for the era of satellite gravimetry, Doctoral dissertation in Geodesy, Royal Institute of Technology, TRITA-INFRA 04-033, Stockholm. www.infra.kth.se/geo/
- Bjerhammar A. (1962) Gravity reduction to a spherical surface. Royal Institute of Technology, Division of Geodesy, Stockholm
- Bjerhammar A (1974) Discrete approaches to the solution of the boundary value problem of physical geodesy. Paper presented at the International School of Geodesy, Erice, Italy
- Cook A. H. (1967) The determination of the external gravity field of the Earth from observation of artificial satellites. Geophysical Journal of Royal Astronomy Society, Vol. 13.
- Heiskanen W. A. and H. Moritz (1967). Physical geodesy. W H Freeman and Co., San Francisco and London
- Holota P. (1994) Two branches of the Newton potential and geoid. In H Suenkel and I Marson (eds.): Gravity and Geoid. IAG Symposia No. 113, Graz, Springer, 205-214
- Holota P. (1996) Geoid, Cauchy's problem and displacement. In J Segawa, H Fujimoto and S Okubo (eds.): Gravity, Geoid and Marin Geodesy. IAG Symposia No. 117, Tokyo, Springer, 368-375
- Kellog O. D.(1953) Foundations of potential theory, Dover Publ., Inc., New York
- Krarup T. (1969) A contribution to the mathematical foundation of physical geodesy. Geodaetisk Institut, Meddelelse no. 48, Copenhagen
- Landkof N. S. (1972) Foundations of modern potential theory, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York
- Moritz H. (1980) Advanced physical geodesy. Herbert Wichmann Verlag, Karlsruhe.
- Rapp R. H. (1997) Use of potential coefficient models for geoid undulation determinations using a spherical harmonic representation of the height anomaly/geoid undulation difference, Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 71, 282-289.
- Sjöberg L. E. (1977) On the errors of spherical harmonic developments of gravity at the surface of the earth, Depth Geod Sci Rep No. 257, The OSU, Columbus, OH
- Sjöberg L. E. (2003a) A solution to the downward continuation effect on the geoid determined by Stokes's formula, Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 77, 94-100
- Sjöberg L. E. (2003b) A computational scheme to model the geoid by the modified Stokes's formula without gravity reductions, Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 77, 423-432
- Sjöberg L. E. (2007) The topographic bias by analytical continuation in physical geodesy, Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 81, 345-350
- Sjöberg L. E.(2008) Answers to the comments by M. Vermeer on L. E. Sjöberg (2007) "The topographic bias by analytical continuation in physical geodesy" J Geod 81:345-350, Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 82, 451-452
- Sjöberg L. E. (2009a) The terrain correction in gravimetric geoid computation - is it needed? Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 176, 14-18.
- Sjöberg L. E. (2009b) On the topographic bias in geoid determination by the external gravity field, Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 83, 967-972.
- Vermeer M. (2008) Comment on Sjöberg (2007) "The topographic bias by analytical continuation in physical geodesy "J Geod 81(5),345-350, Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 82, 445-450.