Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Contribution of 1st -3rd Order Terms of a Binomial Expansion of Topographic Heights in Topographic and Atmospheric Effects on Satellite Gravity Gradiometric Data Cover

Contribution of 1st -3rd Order Terms of a Binomial Expansion of Topographic Heights in Topographic and Atmospheric Effects on Satellite Gravity Gradiometric Data

Artificial Satellites
Volume 44 (2009): Issue 1 (March 2009)
By:   
Open Access
|Oct 2009
References

References

  1. Ecker E. and Mittermayer E. (1969) Gravity corrections for the influence of the atmosphere., Vol. 11, 70-80.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Eshagh M. (2008) Non-singular expression for the vector and gradient tensor in a geocentric spherical frame,, Vol. 32, 1762-1768.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Eshagh M. (2009a), Doctoral dissertation in Geodesy, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Eshagh M. (2009b) Spherical harmonic expansion of the atmospheric gravitational potential based on exponential and power models of atmosphere,, Vol. 43, No. 1, 25-43.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Eshagh M. and Sjöberg L.E. (2008) Impact of topographic and atmospheric masses over Iran on validation and inversion of GOCE gradiometric data,, Vol. 4, No. 3, 15-30.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Eshagh M. and Sjöberg L.E. (2009a) Topographic and atmospheric effects on GOCE gradiometric data in a local north-oriented frame: A case study in Fennoscandia and Iran,, Vol. 53, 61-80.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Eshagh M. and Sjöberg L.E. (2009b) Atmospheric effect on satellite gravity gradiometry data,, Vol. 47, 9-19.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Heck B. (2003) On Helmert's Methods of Condensation., Vol. 7, 155-170.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Heiskanen W. and Moritz H. (1967)W.H Freeman and company, San Fransisco and London.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Koop R. (1993), Publication in Geodesy, New Series, No. 38. Netherlands Geodetic Commission, Delft.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Lambeck K., (1988)Clarendon, Oxford University Press, New York
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Makhloof A. (2007), Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Theoretical and Physical Geodesy, Bonn, Germany.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Makhloof A. and Ilk K.H. (2005) Far-zone topography effects on gravity and geoid heights according to Helmert's methods of condensation and based on Airy-Heiskanen model,, El-Minia, April 3-5, 2005.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Makhloof A. and Ilk K. H. (2006) Band-limited topography effects in airborne gravimetry using space localizing base functions,, 3 April, 2006
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Martinec Z., Matyska C., Grafarend E.W. and Vaníček P. (1993) On Helmert's 2condensation method,, Vol. 18, 417-421.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Martinec Z. and Vaníček P. (1994) Direct topographical effect of Helmert's condensation for a spherical geoid., Vol. 19, 257-268.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Mueller J. (2003) GOCE gradients in various reference frames and their accuracies,, Vol. 1, 33-38.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Novák P. (2000)Technical Report 207, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Nahavandchi J. (2004) A new strategy for the atmospheric gravity effect in gravimetric geoid determination,, Vol. 77, 823-828.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Novák P. and Grafarend E.W. (2006) The effect of topographical and atmospherical masses on spaceborne gravimetric and gradiometric data,, Vol. 50, 549-582.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Petrovskaya M.S. and Vershkov A.N. (2006) Non-singular expressions for the gravity gradients in the local north-oriented and orbital frames,, Vol. 80, 117-127.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Reference Atmosphere Committee (1961)., April 1961. North Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Seitz K. and Heck B. (2003) Efficient calculation of topographic reductions by the use of tesseroids., Nice, France, 6-11 April 2003.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Sjöberg L.E. (1993) Terrain effects in the atmospheric gravity and geoid correction., Vol. 64, 178-184.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Sjöberg L.E. (1998a) The ellipsoidal corrections to the topographic geoid effects,, Vol. 77, 804-808.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Sjöberg L.E. (1998b) The atmospheric geoid and gravity corrections,-No.4, 421-435.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Sjöberg L.E. (1999) The IAG approach to the atmospheric geoid correction in Stokes's formula and a new strategy,, Vol. 73, 362-366.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Sjöberg L.E. (2000) Topographic effects by the Stokes-Helmert method of geoid and quasigeoid determinations., Vol. 74, 255-268.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. Sjöberg L.E. (2001) Topographic and atmospheric corrections of gravimetric geoid determination with special emphasis on the effects of harmonics of degrees zero and one,, Vol. 75, 283-290.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Sjöberg Le. E (2006) The effects of Stokes's formula for an ellipsoidal layering of the earth's atmosphere,, Vol. 79, 675-681.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Sjöberg L.E. (2007) Topographic bias by analytical continuation in physical geodesy., Vol. 81, 345-350.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Sjöberg L.E. and Nahavandchi H. (1999) On the indirect effect in the Stokes-Helmert method of geoid determination., Vol. 73, 87-93.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Sjöberg L.E. and Nahavandchi H. (2000) The atmospheric geoid effects in Stokes formula,, Vol. 140, 95-100.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Sun W. and Sjöberg L.E. (2001) Convergence and optimal truncation of binomial expansions used in isostatic compensations and terrain corrections,, Vol. 74, 627-636.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Tenzer R., Novák P., Moore P. and Vajda P. (2006) Atmospheric effects in the derivation of geoid-generated gravity anomalies,, Vol. 50, 583-593.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Tsoulis D. (2001) Terrain correction computations for a densly sampled DTM in the Bavarian Alps., Vol. 75, 291-307.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. United State Standard Atmosphere (1976), Washington D.C.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Wieczorek M. A. (2007) The gravity and topography of the terrestrial planets,, Vol. 10, 165-206.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Wild F. and Heck B. (2004a) A comparison of different isostatic models applied to satellite gravity gradiometry, Gravity, Geoid and Space Missions GGSM 2004.Porto, Portugal August 30-September 3, 2004.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Wild F. and Heck B. (2004b) Effects of topographic and isostatic masses in satellite gravity gradiometry., Frascati/Italy, March 8-10, 2004 (ESA SP - 569, June 2004), CD-ROM.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10018-009-0016-5 | Journal eISSN: 2083-6104 | Journal ISSN: 1509-3859 (formerly 0208-841X)
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 21 - 31
Published on: Oct 9, 2009
Published by: Polish Academy of Sciences, Space Research Centre
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Spherical harmonics,
potential,
binomial expansion,
atmospheric density model,
global topographic height model
Related subjects:
Geosciences,
Geosciences, other

© 2009 M. Eshagh, published by Polish Academy of Sciences, Space Research Centre
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 44 (2009): Issue 1 (March 2009)
Previous article
Next article