Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Multi-objective optimization of high speed vehicle-passenger catamaran by genetic algorithm Cover

Multi-objective optimization of high speed vehicle-passenger catamaran by genetic algorithm

Polish Maritime Research
Volume 18 (2011): Issue 4 (October 2011)
By:   
Open Access
|Jan 2012
References

References

  1. Abraham, A., Jain, L. and Goldberg, R., 2005.Springer.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Back, T., 1996.Oxford University Press, New York.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Binh, T. T. and Korn, U., 1997. MOBES: A Multiobjective Evolution Strategy for Constrained Optimization Problems. In:, 25-27 June 1997, Brno, Czech Republic, 176-182.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Darwin, Ch., 1859.John Murray, London.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Coello Coello, C. A., Lamont, G. B. and Veldhuizen, D. A., 2007.Springer.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Cohon, J. L., 1978.New York, Academic Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Coley, D. A., 1999.World Scientific, Singapore.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Das, P. K., 1993. Reliability - Based Design Procedure of Stiffened Cylinder Using Multiple Criteria Optimisation Techniques. In:, Vol. 3, No. 7236, 297-313.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Das, P. K., Tolikas, C., Morandi, A. C., Zanic, V. and Warren, N. F., 1993. Multiple Criteria Synthesis Technique Applied to the Reliabilty Based Structural Design of Hull Components of A Fast Swath Ship. In:, Japan, Tokyo, Vol. 1, 473-487.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Davis, L. 1991.New York: Van Nostrand.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. De Jong, K., 1995. On Decentralizing Selection Algorithms. In:, 15-19 July 1995, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, 17-23.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Deb, K., 2001.John Wiley & Sons.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratab, A. and Meyarivan, T., 2000.NSGA-II. KanGAL Report 200001, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Edgeworth, F. Y., 1881.Paul Keagan, London, England.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Eschenauer, H., Koski, J. and Osyczka, A., 1990.Berlin: Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Fonseca, C. M. and Fleming, P. J., 1993. Genetic Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization: Formulation, Discussion and Generalization. In:, 416-423.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Fonseca, C. M. and Fleming, P. J., 1996. On the Performance Assessment and Comparison of Stochastic Multiobjective Optimizers. In:, September 1996, Berlin, Germany, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 585-593.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Fonseca, C. M., Knowles, J. D., Thiele, L. and Zitzler, E., 2005. A Tutorial on the Performance Assessment of Stochastic Multiobjective Optimizers. Invited talk. In:, 9-11 March 2005, Guanajuato, Mexico, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3410, Springer 2005
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Fox, R. L., 1971.Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., Reading.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Goldberg, D. E., 1989.Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. Boston, MA, USA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Goldberg, D. E. and Deb K., 1991. A Comparative Analysis of Selection Schemes Used in Genetic Algorithms. In:Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, 69-93.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Hajela, P. and Lin, C. Y., 1992. Genetic Search Strategies in Multicriterion Optimal Design., 4: 99-107.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. HANSA, 1997.6:26-29.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Hansen, M. P. and Jaszkiewicz, A., 1998.Technical report, Institute of Mathematical Modeling, Technical University of Denmark, IMM Technical Report IMM-REP-1998-7.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Horn, J., Nafpliotis, N. and Goldberg, D. E., 1994. A Niched Pareto Genetic Algorithm for Multiobjective Optimization. In:, IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, 1: 82-87.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Hughes, E. J., 2003. Multiple Single Objective Sampling. In:, 8 - 12 December 2003, Canberra, Australia, 2678-2684.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Hughes, E. J., 2005. Evolutionary Many-objective Optimization: Many Once or One Many? In:, CEC 2005, 2-4 September 2005, Edinbourgh, Scotland, UK, IEEE Press, 222-227.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Hutchinson, K., Todd, D. and Sen, P., 1998. An evolutionary multiple objective strategy for the optimisation of made-to-order products with special reference to the conceptual design of high speed mono hull roll-on/roll-off passenger ferries. In:
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Ishibuchi, H. and Murata, T., 1996. Multi-objective genetic local search algorithm. In:, Piscataway, NJ, IEEE Press, 119-124.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Jang, C. D. and Shin, S. H., 1997. A Study on the Optimal Structural Design for Oil Tankers Using Multi Objective Optimization. In:, IMDC'97, Newcastle, 23-25 June 1997, University of Newcastle, United Kingdom, Vol. 1, Penshaw Press, 217-231.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Jaszkiewicz, A., 2004. On the Computational Efficiency of Multiple Objective Metaheuristics: The Knapsack Problem Case Study., 158:418-433.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Jianguo. W. and Zuoshui. X., 1996. Symmetric Solution of Fuzzy Multi-Objective Optimization for Ship Structure., 10(1): 1-7.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Kitamura, M., Nobukawa, H. and Yang, F., 2000. Application of a genetic algorithm to the optimal structural design of a ship's engine room taking dynamic constraints into consideration., Vol. 5, 131-146.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Klanac, A., Ehlers, S. and Jelovica, J., 2009. Optimization of crashworthy marine structures., Vol. 22, 670-690.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. Knowles, J. and Corne. D., 1999. The Pareto Archived Evolution Strategy: a New Baseline Algorithm for Multiobjective Optimisation. In:, Washington, D. C., 6-9 July 1999, IEEE Service Center, 98-105.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Knowles, J. D., Thiele, L. and Zitzler, E., 2006.Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory, ETH Zurich, Switzerland, TIK-Report No. 214.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Kursawe, F., 1991. A variant of evolution strategies for vector optimization.Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN I), 1-3 October 1990, Dortmund, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1991, 193-197.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. Leyland, G., 2002.PhD Thesis, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Man, K. F., Tang, K. S. and Kwong, S., 1999.Springer-Verlag, London.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. Michalewicz, Z., 1996.Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  41. Murata, T. and Ishibuchi, H., 1995. MOGA: Multi-objective genetic algorithms. In:, 289-294. In Proceedings of the Second IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Press, 289-294.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Okada, T. and Neki, I., 1992. Utilization of Genetic Algorithm for Optimizing the Design of Ship Hull Structure., 171: 71-83.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. Osyczka, A., 2002.Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Pareto, V., 1896.Lausanne: F. Rouge.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Parsons, M. G. and Singer, D., 2000. A Fuzzy Logic Agent for Design Team Communications and Negotiations. In:, March 2000, Potsdam/Berlin.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Purshouse, R. C. and Fleming, P. J., 2003. Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization: An Exploratory Analysis. In:, CEC2003, 8-12 Dec 2003, Canberra, Australia, IEEE, Piscataway, N. J., USA, 2066-2073.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Ray, T. and Sha, O. P., 1994. Multicriteria Optimisation Model for a Containership Design., 31(4): 258-268.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  48. Reklaitis, G. V., Ravindran, A. and Ragsdell, K. M., 1983.New York: John Wiley and Sons, New York.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Ryan, D. M., 1974. Penalty and Barrier Functions.P. E. Gill and W. Murray (Eds.), Academy Press, London.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Sarker, R. and Coello Coello, C. A., 2002. Evolutionary Optimization, Chapter 7, Assessment methodologies for multiobjective evolutionary algorithms.R. Sarker, M. Mohammadian, X. Yao (Editors), Academic Publishers, Boston, 177-195.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  51. Sarker, R., Mohammadian, M. and Yao, X., (Eds.), 2002.Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  52. Schaffer, J. D., 1985. Multiple Objective Optimization with Vector Evaluated Genetic Algorithms. In:, 24-26 July 1985, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pa, 93-100.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. Sekulski, Z., 2010. Multi-objective topology and size optimization of high-speed vehicle-passenger catamaran structure by genetic algorithm., Vol. 23, 405-433.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  54. Sen, P. and Yang, J. B., 1995. An Investigation Into the Influence of Preference Modelling in Ship Design with Multiple Objectives. In:, Vol. 2, Society of Naval Architecture of Korea, 1252-1263.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. Sen, P. and Yang, J. B., 1998.London: Springer-Verlag.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  56. Shi, W. B., 1992. In-Service Assessment of Ship Structures: Effect of General Corrosion on Ultimate Strength. In:
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. Significant Ships, 1997., 21-21.
    Search in Google Scholar
  58. Srinivas, N. and Deb, K., 1995. Multiobjective Optimization Using Nondominated Sorting in Genetic Algorithms., 2(3): 221-248.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  59. Stadler, W., 1988. Multiobjective Optimization in Engineering and in the Sciences. New York: Plenum Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. Statnikov, R. B. and Matosov, J. B., 1995. Multicriteria Optimization and Engineering. New York: Chapman&Hall.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  61. Trincas, G., Zanic, V. and Grubisic, I., 1994. Comprehensive Concept Design of Fast RO-RO Ships by Multi-Atribute Decision-Making. In:, Delft, 403-417.
    Search in Google Scholar
  62. UNITAS, 1995. Rules for the Construction and Classification of High Speed Craft.
    Search in Google Scholar
  63. Vanderplaats, G. N., 1984. Numerical Optimization Techniques for Engineering Designs. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Search in Google Scholar
  64. Veldhuizen Van, D. A., 1999.Ph. D. thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio.
    Search in Google Scholar
  65. Veldhuizen Van, D. A. and Lamont, G. B., 2000. On measuring multiobjective evolutionary algorithm performance.A. Zazala, R. Eberhart (Eds.), vol. 1, Piscataway, NY, IEEE Press, 204-211.
    Search in Google Scholar
  66. Zitzler, E., 1999.Disertation for degree of Doctor of Technical Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurych.
    Search in Google Scholar
  67. Zitzler, E., Deb, K. and Thiele, L., 1999.TIK-Report, No. 70, Computer Engineering and Communication Networks Lab, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurych, Switzerland.
    Search in Google Scholar
  68. Zitzler, E., Deb, K. and Thiele, L., 2000. Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: Empirical results., 8(2): 173-195.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  69. Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M. and Bleuler, S., 2002. A tutorial on evolutionary multiobjective optimization. In, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
    Search in Google Scholar
  70. Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M. and Thiele, L., 2001. SPEA-2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm. Evolutionary Methods for Design. In:, 19-21 September 2001, International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Greece, p. 95-100.
    Search in Google Scholar
  71. Zitzler, E. and Thiele, L., 1998. Multiobjective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms - A Comparative Case Study. In:, Amsterdam, 292-301.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  72. Zitzler, E. and Thiele, L., 1998. Multiobjective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms - A Comparative Case Study. In:, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 27-30 September 1998, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 292-301.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  73. Zitzler, E. and Thiele, L., 1999. Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: A Comparative Case Study and Strength Pareto Approach., 3(4): 257-271.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  74. Zitzler, E. and Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., Fonseca, C. M., Grunert da Fonseca V., 2002.TIK-Report No. 139, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Switzerland.
    Search in Google Scholar
  75. Zitzler, E., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., Fonseca, C. M. and Grunert da Fonseca V., 2003. Performance Assessment of Multiobjective Optimizers: An Analysis and Review., 7(2):117-132.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10012-011-0020-0 | Journal eISSN: 2083-7429 | Journal ISSN: 1233-2585
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 13
Published on: Jan 6, 2012
Published by: Gdansk University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
ship structure,
multi-objective optimization,
evolutionary algorithm,
genetic algorithm,
Pareto domination,
set of non-dominated solutions
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Introductions and overviews,
Engineering, other,
Geosciences,
Atmospheric science and climatology,
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2012 Zbigniew Sekulski, published by Gdansk University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 18 (2011): Issue 4 (October 2011)
Next article