Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Designing a ship course controller by applying the adaptive backstepping method Cover

Designing a ship course controller by applying the adaptive backstepping method

International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science
Volume 22 (2012): Issue 4 (December 2012)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Dec 2012
References

References

  1. Alfarocid, E., McGookin, E.W., Murray-Smith, D.J. and Fossen, T.I. (2005). Genetic algorithms optimisation of decoupled sliding model controllers simulated and real results,(6): 739-748.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Almeida, J., Silvestre, C. and Pascoal, A. (2007). Path-following control of fully-actuated surface vessels in the presence of ocean currents,, (on CD-ROM).
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Amerongen, J. (1982)., Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Bibuli, M., Caccia, M. and Lapierre, L. (2007). Path-following control of fully-actuated surface vessels in the presence of ocean currents,, (on CD-ROM).
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Casado, M.H. and Ferreiro, R. (2005). Identification of the nonlinear ship model parameters based on the turning test trials and the backstepping procedure,(11-12): 1350-1369.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Chen, W., Zhou, F., Li, Y. and Song, R. (2008). The ship nonlinear course system control based on auto disturbance rejection controller,, pp. 6454-6458.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Do, K.D., Jiang, Z. and Pan, J. (2004). Robust adaptive path following of underactuated ships,(6): 929-944.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Du, J.L., Guo, C.Y. and Zhao, S. (2004). Adaptive robust nonlinear design of course keeping ship steering autopilot,, Vol. 1, pp. 13-18.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Fossen, T.I. and Strand, J.P. (1999). A tutorial on nonlinear backstepping: Applications to ship control,(2): 83-135.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Galbas, J. (1988)., Ph.D. thesis, Gdan´sk University of Technology, Gdan´sk, (in Polish).
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Grimble, M., Zhang, Y. and Katebi, M.R. (1993).-based ship autopilot design,pp. 678-683.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Han, J.Q. (2002). From PID technique to active disturbance rejection control technique,(3): 13-18.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Han, Y., Xiao, H., Wang, C. and Zhou, F. (2009). Design and simulation of ship course controller based on auto disturbance rejection control technique,, pp. 686-691.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Karr, C.L. (1991). Design of an adaptive fuzzy logic controller using a genetic algorithm,, pp. 450-457.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Kokotovic, P. and Arcak, M. (2001). Constructive nonlinear control: A historical perspective,(5): 637-662.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Krstic, M., Kanellakopulos, I. and Kokotovic, P.V. (1995)., John Wiley and Sons Ltd., New York, NY.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Krstic, M. and Panagiotis, T. (1999). Inverse optimal stabilization of a rigid spacecraft,(5): 1042-1043.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. McGookin, E., Murray-Smith, D., Li, Y. and Fossen, T.I. (2000). Ship steering control system optimisation using genetic algorithms,(4): 429-443.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Messer, A. and Grimble, M. (1993). Introduction to robust ship track-keeping control design,(3): 104-110.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Pettersen, K. and Nijmeijer, H. (2004). Introduction to robust ship track-keeping control design,(4): 189-199.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Richter, R. and Burns, R. (1993). An artificial neural network autopilot for small vessels,, pp. 168-172.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Ruan, J.H. (2006). The design of ship course intelligent controller based on FNN of non-linear system,(4): 29-33.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Shaocheng, T., Changliang, L. and Yongming, L. (2010). Robust adaptive fuzzy filters output feedback control of strict feedback nonlinear systems,(4): 637-653, DOI: 10.2478/v10006-010-0047-x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Simensen, R. (1995). Simulation of artificial neural networks for ship steering control,, pp. 65-72.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Tomera, M. (2010). Nonlinear controller design of a ship autopilot,(2): 271-280, DOI: 10.2478/v10006-010-0020-8.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Velagic, J., Vukic, Z. and Omerdic, E. (2003). Adaptive fuzzy ship autopilot for track-keeping,(4): 433-443.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Witkowska, A. and Smierzchalski, R. (2009). Nonlinear backstepping ship course controller,(3): 277-284.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Witkowska, A., Tomera, M. and S´mierzchalski, R. (2007). A backstepping approach to ship course control,(1): 73-85, DOI: 10.2478/v10006-007-0007-2.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. Zhang, X.K. and Jia, X.L. (2000). Robust PID algorithm based on closed-loop gain shaping and its application on level control,(3): 35-39.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Zwierzewicz, Z. (2004). On the adaptive ship track-keeping system design via LQR-integral control,, pp. 207-212.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10006-012-0073-y | Journal eISSN: 2083-8492 | Journal ISSN: 1641-876X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 985 - 997
Published on: Dec 28, 2012
Published by: University of Zielona Góra
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
autopilot,
adaptive control,
nonlinear control,
backstepping,
genetic algorithm.
Related subjects:
Mathematics,
Applied mathematics

© 2012 Anna Witkowska, Roman Śmierzchalski, published by University of Zielona Góra
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 22 (2012): Issue 4 (December 2012)
Previous article
Next article