Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
FSP and FLTL framework for specification and verification of middle-agents Cover

FSP and FLTL framework for specification and verification of middle-agents

Open Access
|Mar 2011

References

  1. Alagar, V. and Holliday, J. (2002). Agent types and their formal descriptions,, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA.
  2. Bergstra, J., Ponse, A. and Smolka, S. (2001)., Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
  3. Brazier, F. M. T., Cornelissen, F., Gustavsson, R., Jonker, C. M., Lindeberg, O., Polak, B. and Treur, J. (2004). Compositional verification of a multi-agent system for one-to-many negotiation,(2): 95-117.
  4. Bădică, A. and Bădică, C. (2008a). Conceptualizing interactions with matchmakers and front-agents using formal verification methods,D. Dochev, M. Pistore and P. Traverso (Eds.),, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 5253, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 390-394.
  5. Bădică, A. and Bădică, C. (2008b). Formal specification of matchmakers, front-agents, and brokers in agent environments using FSP,, pp. 9-18.
  6. Bădică, A. and Bădică, C. (2008c). Formalizing agent-based english auctions using finite state process algebra,(7): 1118-1135.
  7. Bădică, A. and Bădică, C. (2008d). Modeling interactions in agent-based English auctions with matchmaking capabilities,C. Bădică, G. Mangioni, V. Carchiolo and D. D. Burdescu (Eds.),, Studies in Computational Intelligence, Vol. 162, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 45-54.
  8. Bădică, A. and Bădică, C. (2008e). Specification and verification of agent interactions in matchmaking processes using FSP and FLTL,, pp. 1-6.
  9. Bădică, A. and Bădică, C. (2009a). Formalizing agent interactions in matchmaking processes using FSP and FLTL,(1): 13-18.
  10. Bădică, A. and Bădică, C. (2009b). Specification and verification of an agent-based auction service,G. A. Papadopoulos, W. Wojtkowski, G. Wojtkowski, S. Wrycza, and J. Zupancic (Eds.), Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, pp. 239-248.
  11. Bădică, A., Bădică, C. and Liţoiu, L. (2003). Role activity diagrams as finite state processes,, pp. 15-22.
  12. Bădică, A., Bădică, C. and Liţoiu, L. (2007). Middle-agents interactions as finite state processes: Overview and example,, pp. 12-17.
  13. Bădică, A., Bădică, C., Popescu, E. and Scafes, M. (2009). A process algebraic framework for service coordination,, pp. 515-520.
  14. Bădică, C., Ganzha, M. and Paprzycki, M. (2007). Developing a model agent-based e-commerce system,J. Lu, G. Zhang and D. Ruan (Eds.),, Studies in Computational Intelligence, Vol. 55, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 555-578.
  15. Clarke, E. M., Emerson, E. A. and Sistla, A. P. (1986). Automatic verification of finite-state concurrent systems using temporal logic specifications,(2): 244-263.
  16. Decker, K., Sycara, K. P. and Williamson, M. (1997). Middle-agents for the internet,, Vol. 1, pp. 578-583.
  17. D'Ippolito, N., Fischbein, D., Chechik, M. and Uchitel, S. (2008). MTSA: The modal transition system analyser,, pp. 475-476.
  18. Dobriceanu, A., Bîscu, L., Bădică, A. and Bădică, C. (2009). The design and implementation of an agent-based auction service,(2/3): 188-211.
  19. Dwyer, M. B., Avrunin, G. S. and Corbett, J. C. (1999). Patterns in property specifications for finite-state verification,, pp. 411-420.
  20. Esterline, A., Rorie, T. and Homaifar, A. (2006). A process-algebraic agent abstraction,C. A. Rouff, M. Hinchey, J. Rash, W. Truszkowski and D. Gordon-Spears (Eds.),, NASA Monographs in Systems and Software Engineering, Springer-Verlag, London, pp. 88-137.
  21. Fasli, M. (2007)., JohnWiley & Sons, Chichester.
  22. Fokkink, W. (2007)., EATCS Series, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg.
  23. Foster, H., Uchitel, S., Magee, J. and Kramer, J. (2006). LTSAWS: A tool for model-based verification of web service compositions and choreography,L. J. Osterweil, H. D. Rombach and M. L. Soffa (Eds.),, pp. 771-774.
  24. Goh, S., Chhetri, M. B. and Kowalczyk, R. (2007). JADE-FSM-engine: A deployment tool for flexible agent behaviours in JADE,, pp. 524-527.
  25. Hennicker, R. and Ludwig, M. (2005). Property-driven development of a coordination model for distributed simulations,M. Steffen and G. Zavattaro (Eds.),, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3535, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 290-305.
  26. Hoare, C. A. R. (1985)., Prentice Hall International Series in Computer Science, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  27. Hristozova, M. and Sterling, L. (2003). Experiences with ontology development for value-added publishing,S. Cranefield, T. W. Finin, V. A. M. Tamma and S. Willmott (Eds.),, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 73, pp. 17-24.
  28. Klusch, M. and Sycara, K. P. (2001). Brokering and matchmaking for coordination of agent societies: A survey,A. Omicini, F. Zambonelli, M. Klusch and R. Tolksdorf (Eds.),, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, NY, pp. 197-224.
  29. Magee, J. and Kramer, J. (2006)., 2nd Edn., John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
  30. Mbala, A., Padgham, L. and Winikoff, M. (2006). Design options for subscription managers,G. A. Vouros and T. Panayiotopoulos (Eds.),, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3529, Springer, London, pp. 259-274.
  31. Merayo, M., Núñez, M., and Rodríguez, I. (2007). Specification of multi-agent systems by using EUSMs,, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4767, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, NY, pp. 318-333.
  32. Miller, T. and McBurney, P. (2007). Using constraints and process algebra for specification of first-class agent interaction protocols,, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4457, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, NY, pp. 245-254.
  33. Milner, R. (1999)., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  34. Podorozhny, R. M., Khurshid, S., Perry, D. E. and Zhang, X. (2007). Verification of multi-agent negotiations using the alloy analyzer,, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4591, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, NY, pp. 501-517.
  35. Rahimi, S., Cobb, M., Ali, D. and Petry, F. (2002). A modeling tool for intelligent-agent based systems: Api-calculus,V. Loia (Ed.),, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 165-186.
  36. Rouff, C., Rash, J., Hinchey, M. and Truszkowski, W. (2006). Formal methods at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,C. A. Rouff, M. Hinchey, J. Rash, W. Truszkowski and D. Gordon-Spears (Eds.),, NASA Monographs in Systems and Software Engineering, Springer-Verlag, London, pp. 287-309.
  37. Wang, F. (2002). Self-organising communities formed by middle agents,, pp. 1333-1339.
  38. Wong, H. C. and Sycara, K. (2000). A taxonomy of middle-agents for the Internet,, pp. 465-466.
  39. Xu, D.-X., El-Ariss, O., Xu, W.-F. and Wang, L.-Z. (2009). Aspect-oriented modeling and verification with finite state machines,(5): 949-961.
  40. Yarom, I., Rosenschein, J. S. and Goldman, C. V. (2003). The role of middle-agents in electronic commerce,(6): 15-21.
  41. Zhang, P., Muccini, H. and Li, B. (2010). A classification and comparison of model checking software architecture techniques,(5): 723-744.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10006-011-0001-6 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8492 | Journal ISSN: 1641-876X
Language: English
Page range: 9 - 25
Published on: Mar 28, 2011
Published by: University of Zielona Góra
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2011 Amelia Bădică, Costin Bădică, published by University of Zielona Góra
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.