Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Classification in the Gabor time-frequency domain of non-stationary signals embedded in heavy noise with unknown statistical distribution Cover

Classification in the Gabor time-frequency domain of non-stationary signals embedded in heavy noise with unknown statistical distribution

International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science
Volume 20 (2010): Issue 1 (March 2010)
By:   
Open Access
|Mar 2010
References

References

  1. Auger F., Flandrin P., Goncalves P. and Lemoine O. (1996)., CNRS, Rice University, Houston, TX
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Basri R., Costa L., Geiger D. and Jacobs D. (1998). Determining the similarity of deformable shapes,(15-16): 2365-2385.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Basseville M. (1989). Distance measures for signal processing and pattern recognition,(3): 349-369.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Belongie S., Malik J. and Puzicha J. (2002). Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts,(4): 509-522.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Bishop C. M. (2006)., Springer Science + Business Media LLC, New York, NY.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Breakenridge C. and Mesbah M. (2003). Minimum classification error using time-frequency analysis,, pp. 717-720.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Colas M. and Gelle G. (2004). A multitime-frequency approach for detection and classification of neighboring instantaneous frequency laws in a noisy environment,(2): 71-74.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Davy M. and Doncarli C. (1998). Optimal kernels of time-frequency representations for signal classification,, pp. 581-584.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Demirci M. F., van Leuken R. H. and Veltkamp R. C. (2007). Shape indexing through laplacian spectra,, pp. 21-26.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Doncarli C., Davy M. and Boudreaux-Bartels F. (2001). Improved optimization of time-frequency-based signal classifiers,(2): 52-57.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Duda R. O., Hart P. E. and Stork D. G. (2001)., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Flandrin P. (1988). A time-frequency formulation of optimal detection,(9): 1337-1384.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Fry D. (1993)., Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Fukunaga K. (1990)., Academic Press, London.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Gdalyahu Y. and Weinshall D. (1999). Flexible syntactic matching of curves and its application to automatic hierarchical classification of silhouettes,(12): 1312-1328.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Gillespie B. and Atlas L. (2001). Optimizing time-frequency kernels for classification,(3): 485-496.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Grigorescu S. E., Petkov N. and Kruizinga P. (2002). Comparison of texture features based on Gabor filters,(10): 1160-1167.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Gröchenig K. (2001)., Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, pp. 83-142.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Hagedoorn M. and Veltkamp R. C. (1999). Reliable and efficient pattern matching using an affine invariant metric,(2/3): 203-225.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Heitz C. (1995). Optimum time-frequency representations for the classification and detection of signals,(3): 124-143.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Huang Y., Chan K. L. and Zhang Z. (2003). Texture classification by multi-model feature integration using Bayesian networks,(1-3): 393-401.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Jain A. K., Duin R. P. W. and Mao J. (2000). Statistical pattern recognition: A review,(1): 4-7.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Kyrki V., Kamarainen J.-K. and Klviinen H. (2004). Simple Gabor feature space for invariant object recognition,(3): 311-318.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Latecki L. J. and Lakamper R. (2000). Shape similarity measure based on correspondence of visual parts,(10): 1185-1190.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Li S. and Shawe-Taylor S. (2005). Comparison and fusion of multiresolution features for texture classification,(5): 633-638.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Liu H. and Srinath M. (1990). Partial shape classification using contour matching in distance transforms,(2): 1072-1079.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Manay S., Cremers D., Hong B.-W., Yezzi A. J. Jr. and Soatto S. (2006). Integral invariants for shape matching,(10): 1602-1618.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. McLachlan G. J. (1992)., Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Petrakis E. G. M., Diplaros A. and Milios E. (2002). Matching and retrieval of distorted and occluded shapes using dynamic programming,(11): 1501-1516.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Qian S. and Chen D. (1993). Discrete Gabor Transform,(7): 2429-2438.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. Richard C. and Lengell R. (1999). Data driven design and complexity control of time frequency detectors,(1): 37-48.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Santini S. and Jain R. (1999). Similarity measures,(9): 871-883.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Sebe N. and Lew M. S. (2002). Maximum likelihood shape matching,, Vol. 1, pp. 713-718.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Sejdic E., Djurovic I. and Jiang J. (2009). Time-frequency feature representation using energy concentration: An overview of recent advances,(1): 153-183.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. Sondergaard P. (2006)., Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, http://www2.mat.dtu.dk/people/P.Soendergaard/toolbox/.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Tai C.-F. (2007). Image mining by spectral features: A case study of scenery image classification,(1): 135-142.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. Umeyama S. (1993). Parameterized point pattern matching and its application to recognition of object families,(2): 136-144.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. Veltkamp R. C. (2001). Shape matching: Similarity measures and algorithms,, Utrecht University, Utrecht.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Vincent I., Doncarli C. and Carpentier E. L. (1994). Nonstationary signals classification using time-frequency distributions,, pp. 233-236.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Werther T., Eldar Y. C. and Subanna N. K. (2005). Dual Gabor frames: Theory and computational aspects,(11): 4147-4158.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  41. Xie J., Hengb P.-A. and Shah M. (2008). Shape matching and modeling using skeletal context,(5): 1773-1784.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  42. Younes L. (1999). Optimal matching between shapes via elastic deformations,(5-7): 381-389.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. Zhang D. and Lu G. (2003). A comparative study of curvature scale space and Fourier descriptors for shape-based image retrieval,(1): 41-60.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. Zhang D. and Lu G. (2004). Review of shape representation and description techniques,(1): 1-19.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10006-010-0010-x | Journal eISSN: 2083-8492 | Journal ISSN: 1641-876X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 135 - 147
Published on: Mar 25, 2010
Published by: University of Zielona Góra
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
non-stationary signals,
signal classification,
pattern recognition,
time-frequency transforms
Related subjects:
Mathematics,
Applied mathematics

© 2010 Ewa Świercz, published by University of Zielona Góra
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 20 (2010): Issue 1 (March 2010)
Previous article
Next article