Usage of Production Functions in the Comparative Analysis of Transport Related Fuel Consumption
By: Adam Torok, Arpad Torok and Florian Heinitz
References
- 1. Allan G., Hanley N., McGregor P., Swales K., Turner K. (2007): The impact of increased efficiency in the industrial use of energy: A computable general equilibrium analysis for the United Kingdom,29, p. 779-798.
- 2. Arrow, K. J., Chenery, H. B., Minhas, B. S. and Solow, R. M. (1961), Capital-Labor Substitution and Economic Efficiency,43, p. 225-250.
- 3. Avinash K., Stiglitz E. (1977): Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity,67 (3), p. 297-308.
- 4. Beauséjour, L., Lenjosek, G, Smart, M., (1995): A CGE approach to modelling carbon dioxide emissions control in Canada and the US.18, p. 457-489.
- 5. Bergman, L., (1988): Energy policy modelling: a survey of general equilibrium approaches.10, p. 377-399.
- 6. Cobb, C. W., Douglas, P. H. (1928): A Theory of Production. American Economic,18: p. 139-165.
- 7. Conrad, K., (1999):In: van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. (Ed.), Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, Cheltenham.
- 8. Conrad, K., Schröder, M., (1993): Choosing environmental policy instruments using general equilibrium models.15, p. 521-543.
- 9. de Brown, M. and de Carni, J. S. (1963), Technological Change and the Distribution of Income,3, p. 289-309.
- 10. Despotakis, K.A., Fisher, A.C., (1988): Energy in a regional economy: a computable general equilibrium model for California.15, p.313-330.
- 11. Domanovszky, H. (2014). Gas propulsion or e-mobility is the solution on the way of clean and carbon free road transportation?42(1), 63-72.
- 12. Goulder, L.H., (1998): Effects of carbon taxes in an economy with prior tax distortions: an intertemporal general equilibrium analysis.29, p271-297.
- 13. Kerepesi K, Romvári E. (1993):[in Hungarian: Közgazdaságtan mérnököknek], Müegyetemi Kiadó, Budapest, p.471.
- 14. Lee, H., Roland-Holst, D.W., (1997):In: Francois, J.F., Reihert, K.A. (Eds.), Applied Methods for Trade Analysis: A Handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- 15. Li, P., Rose, A., (1995): Global warming policy and the Pennsylvania economy: a computable general equilibrium analysis.7, p.151-171.
- 16. Maeda A., (2010):Kyoto Sustainability Initiative, Kyoto University
- 17. Mitsakis, E., Papanikolaou, A., Ayfadopoulou, G., Salanova, J., Doll, C, Giannopoulos, G., & Zerefos, C. (2014). An integrated framework for linking climate change impacts to emergency adaptation strategies for transport networks.6(2), 103-111.
- 18. Saito T. (2011):Lecture Notes State University of New York at Buffalo.
- 19. Saunders, H. D. (2008): Fuel conserving (and using) production functions,30, p.2184-2235.
- 20. Siwale, L., Kristóf, L., Adam, T., Bereczky, A., Penninger, A., Mbarawa, M., & Andrei, K. (2013). Performance Characteristics of n-Butanol-Diesel Fuel Blend Fired in a Turbo-Charged Compression Ignition Engine.1(05), p.77-83.
- 21. Solow, R. (1956), A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth, Quarterly.70, p.65-94.
- 22. Spence, M. (1976): Product selection, fixed costs, and monopolistic competition,43 (2), p.217-35.
- 23. Szendrö, G., & Török, Á. (2014). Theoretical investigation of environmental development pathways in the road transport sector in the European Region.29(1), p. 12-17.
- 24. Temple J. (2012): The calibration of CES production functions,34 p.294-303.
- 25. Torok A. (2014): Environmental Comparism Of Road And Railway Transport: A Case Study In Hungary,4(2):210-219 doi: 10.7708/ijtte.2014.4(2).07
- 26. van der Werf E. (2007):Kiel Working Paper No. 1316, Research Paper, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Duesternbrooker Weg 120, 24105 Kiel (Germany), p.31.
- 27. Vass, S., Németh, H. (2013). Sensitivity analysis of instantaneous fuel injection rate determination for detailed Diesel combustion models.41(1), p.77-85.
- 28. Wei T. (2006): Impact of energy efficiency gains on output and energy use with Cobb-Douglas production function,35, p.2023-2030.
- 29. Xu Y, Masui T (2008): Local air pollutant emission reduction and ancillary carbon benefits of SO2 control policies: Application of AIM/CGE model to China,198, p. 315-325.
Language: English
Page range: 292 - 298
Published on: Dec 19, 2014
Published by: Transport and Telecommunication Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Related subjects:
© 2014 Adam Torok, Arpad Torok, Florian Heinitz, published by Transport and Telecommunication Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.