Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Optimization of Decision-Making in Port Logistics Terminals: Using Analytic Hierarchy Process for the Case of Port of Thessaloniki Cover

Optimization of Decision-Making in Port Logistics Terminals: Using Analytic Hierarchy Process for the Case of Port of Thessaloniki

Transport and Telecommunication Journal
Volume 15 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Dec 2014
References

References

  1. 1. Adamos, G., Nathanail, E. and Zacharaki, E. (2012). Developing Decision-Making framework for Collaborative Practices in Long-Short Distance Transport Interconnection., 48, 2012, 2849-2859.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Al-fatah A. and Karasneh A. (2012). Improving Decision Making: Route Optimization Techniques for Aqaba Sea Port in Jordan., 7 (9).
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Arnold J. (2006).The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Charnes A. and Cooper W. (1961).New York: Wiley.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Chen M. K. and Wang S. (2010). The critical factors of success for information service industry in developing international market: Using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach., 37, 694-704.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Christiansen, P., Johansen, B.G., Andersen, J. and Eidhammer, O. (2012).CLOSER project.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. De Brucker K, Verbeke A. and Macharis C. (2004). The applicability of Multi-Criteria Analysis to the evaluation of Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS).8, 151-179.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Eckhardt, J., Hietajärvi, A-M., Rönty, J., Andersen, J. & Eidhammer, O. (2012).CLOSER project.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Eckhardt J. et al. (2013).. Bothnian Green Logistic Corridor project.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Gogas M. and Nathanail E. (2010). Multi-optimization techniques for the design of freight terminals network. In: the Proceedings of, Volos, September 2010.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Gogas M., Papoutsis K. and Nathanail E. (2013). The impact of management structures and decision making models of “green” logistics terminals on their performance. In: the Proceedings of, Riga, October, 2013.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Huynh N. and Vidal J. M. (2012). A novel methodology for modelling yard cranes at seaport terminals to support planning and real-time decision making., 7 (1), 62 - 91.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. 13. IMONODE consortium (2005)a.IMONODE project.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. 14. IMONODE consortium (2005)b.. IMONODE project.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Karel W. and Brauers M. (2013). Multi-objective seaport planning by MOORA decision making. Annals of Operations Research, 206 (1), 39-58.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Li S. and Li J. Z. (2009). Hybridising human judgment, AHP, simulation and a fuzzy expert system for strategy formulation under uncertainty., 36, 5557-5564.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Nathanail, E., Adamos, G., Parra L., Ruiz-Ayucar, E., L’ Hostis, A., Blanquart, C., Olsen, S., Christiansen, P., Osland, O., Järvi, T., Svedova, Z. Zan, B., (2011).. CLOSER Project.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Nathanail E. G., Gogas M. A. and Papoutsis K. N. (2014). Investigation of Stakeholders’ View towards the introduction of ICT in Supply Chain using Analytic Hierarchy Process., 2 (2), 113-119.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Nijkamp P. (1986), Infrastructure and regional development: A multidimensional policy analysis., 11(1), 1.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P. and Voogd H. (1990).North-Holland. Amsterdam.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Önüt S., Efendigil T., Soner Kara S. (2010). A combined fuzzy MCDM approach for selecting shopping center site: An example from Istanbul, Turkey., 37 (3), 1973-1980.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Permala, A. &Rantasila, K. (2010)ENABLE Deliverable 2.1.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Phuong T. and Chapman D. M. (2006). Seaport development in Vietnam: Evaluation using the AHP. In. Ashgate studies in environmental and natural resource economics.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Saaty T. (1972).in.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Saaty T. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures., 15, 234-281.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Saaty T. L. (1980).. McGraw-Hill International, New York, NY, USA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. 27. Saaty, T. L. (1988).(McGraw-Hil.). New York.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. 28. Ssebuggwawo D., Hoppenbrouwers S. J. B. A., and Proper H. A. (2010) Group Decision Making in Collaborative Modeling: Aggregating Individual Preferences with AHP. In:, Ravenstein, 2010.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. 29. Stillwell W., Von Winterfeldt D. and John R. (1987). Comparing hierarchical and non-hierarchical weighting methods for eliciting multi-attribute value models., 33, 442-450.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. 30. STRAIGHTSOL Consortium (2012)..
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. 31. Su S., Yu J. and Zhang J. (2010). Measurements study on sustainability of China's mining cities., Volume 37 (8), 6028-6035.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. 32. Transportation Research Board National Cooperative Highway Research Program (TRB/NCHRP) (2004).. Transport Research Board of National Academies.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. 33. Triantaphyllou E. and Mann S. H. (1995). Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decision Making in engineering applications: some challenges., 2 (1), 35-44.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. 34. Weber M., Eisenführ F. and Von Winterfeldt D. (1988). The Effects of Spitting Attributes on Weights in Multiattribute Utility Measurement., 34, 431-445.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. 35. Williams, K.M. and Hopes, C. (2007).Centre for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR).
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. 36. World Bank (2005).. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD).
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ttj-2014-0022 | Journal eISSN: 1407-6179 | Journal ISSN: 1407-6160
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 255 - 268
Published on: Dec 19, 2014
Published by: Transport and Telecommunication Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
ports,
decision-making,
AHP,
logistics teminals,
management structures,
Thessaloniki
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Introductions and overviews,
Engineering, other

© 2014 Michael Gogas, Konstantinos Papoutsis, Eftihia Nathanail, published by Transport and Telecommunication Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 15 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)
Next article