Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Glossing an argument: Reformulation and exemplification in L2 Master’s theses Cover

Glossing an argument: Reformulation and exemplification in L2 Master’s theses

Open Access
|Dec 2022

References

  1. Ädel, A., 2006. Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.24
  2. Altenberg, B. and Tapper, M., 1998. The use of adverbial connectors in advanced Swedish learners’ written English. In: S. Granger, ed. Learner English on computer. London: Longman, pp. 80-93.10.4324/9781315841342-6
  3. Anthony, L., 2019. AntConc (Version 3.5.8) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. Available at: https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
  4. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finnegan, E., 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
  5. Bondi, M., 2020. Academics online: Code glosses across research genres and public communication. In: G. Maurizio, S. Maci and M. Sala, eds. Scholarly pathways. Knowledge transfer and knowledge exchange in academia. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 57-82.
  6. Brezina, V., 2018. Statistics in corpus linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316410899
  7. Bunton, D., 1999. The use of higher level metatext in PhD theses. English for Specific Purposes, vol. 18, pp. S41-S56.10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00022-2
  8. Cao, F. and Hu, G., 2014. Interactive metadiscourse in research articles: A comparative study of paradigmatic and disciplinary influences. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 66, pp. 15-31.10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.007
  9. Crismore, A., 1989. Talking with readers: Metadiscourse as rhetorical act. New York: Peter Lang.
  10. Dal Negro, S. and Fiorentini, I., 2014. Reformulation in bilingual speech: Italian cioè in German and Ladin. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 74, pp. 94-108.10.1016/j.pragma.2014.09.002
  11. Del Saz Rubio, M. M., 2011. A pragmatic approach to the macro-structure and metadiscoursal features of research article introductions in the field of agricultural sciences. English for Specific Purposes, vol. 30, pp. 258-271.10.1016/j.esp.2011.03.002
  12. Del Saz Rubio, M. M. and Fraser, B., 2003. Reformulation in English. (unpublished manuscript). [Accessed 15 December 2021]. Available at: https://people.bu.edu/bfraser/
  13. Dontcheva-Navratilova, O., 2021. Engaging with the reader in research articles in English: Variation across disciplines and linguacultural backgrounds. English for Specific Purposes, vol. 63, pp. 18-32.10.1016/j.esp.2021.02.003
  14. Granger, S. and Tyson, S., 1996. Connector usage in the English essay writing of native and non-native EFL speakers of English. World Englishes, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 17-27.10.1111/j.1467-971X.1996.tb00089.x
  15. Gray, B., 2015. Linguistic variation in research articles. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.71
  16. Guziurová, T., 2018. Metadiscourse in undergraduate textbooks and research articles in linguistics. Ostrava: University of Ostrava.
  17. Guziurová, T., 2020. Discourse reflexivity in written academic English as lingua franca: Code glosses in research articles. Discourse and Interaction, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 36-54.10.5817/DI2020-2-36
  18. Hardie, A., 2014. Log ratio – an informal introduction. cass.lancs.ac.uk [Accessed 19 April 2022]. Available at: http://cass.lancs.ac.uk/log-ratio-an-informal-introduction/
  19. Hu, G. and Cao, F., 2015. Disciplinary and paradigmatic influences on interactional metadiscourse in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, vol. 39, pp. 12-25.10.1016/j.esp.2015.03.002
  20. Hyland, K. 2004a. Disciplinary discourses. Social interactions in academic writing. Ann Arbour: The University of Michigan Press.
  21. Hyland, K. 2004b. Disciplinary interactions: metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 13, pp. 133-151.10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001
  22. Hyland, K., 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London and New York: Continuum.
  23. Hyland, K., 2007. Applying a gloss: Exemplifying and reformulating in academic discourse. Applied Linguistics, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 266-285.10.1093/applin/amm011
  24. Hyland, K., 2012. Disciplinary identities: Individuality and community in academic writing. Cambridge: Cambridge Applied Linguistics.10.1017/9781009406512
  25. Hyland, K., 2014. Engagement and disciplinarily: The other side of evaluation. In: G. Del Lungo Camiciotti and E. Tognini Bonelli, eds. Academic discourse – new insights into evaluation. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 13-30.
  26. Hyland, K., 2017. Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 113, pp. 16-29.10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007
  27. Hyland, K. and Jiang, F. K., 2016. “We must conclude that.”: A diachronic study of academic engagement. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 24, pp. 29-42.10.1016/j.jeap.2016.09.003
  28. Hyland, K. and Jiang, F. K., 2021. A bibliometric study of EAP research: Who is doing what, where and when? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 49, [100929].10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100929
  29. Hyland, K. and Tse, P., 2004. Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 156-177.10.1093/applin/25.2.156
  30. Kawase, T., 2015. Metadiscourse in the introductions of PhD theses and research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 20, pp. 114-124.10.1016/j.jeap.2015.08.006
  31. Lei, L. and Liu, D., 2019. Research trends in applied linguistics from 2005 to 2016: A bibliometric analysis and its implications. Applied Linguistics, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 540-561.10.1093/applin/amy003
  32. Mauranen, A., 1993. Cultural differences in academic rhetoric: a textlinguistic study. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
  33. Mauranen, A., 2012. Exploring ELF. Academic English shaped by non-native speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  34. McGrath, L. and Kuteeva, M., 2012. Stance and engagement in pure mathematics research articles: linking discourse features to disciplinary practices. English for Specific Purposes, vol. 31, pp. 161-173.10.1016/j.esp.2011.11.002
  35. Mu, C., Zhang, L.J., Ehrich, J. and Hong, H., 2015. The use of metadiscourse for knowledge construction in Chinese and English research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 20, pp. 135-148.10.1016/j.jeap.2015.09.003
  36. Mur Dueñas, P., 2011. An intercultural analysis of metadiscourse features in research articles written in English and in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 43, no. 13, pp. 3068-3079.10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.002
  37. Murillo, S., 2012. The use of reformulation markers in Business Management research articles: An intercultural analysis. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 64-90.10.1075/ijcl.17.1.03mur
  38. Murillo, S., 2018. Not the same, but how different? Comparing the use of reformulation markers in ELF and in ENL research articles. In: P. Mur-Dueñas and J. Šinkūnienė, eds. Intercultural perspectives on research writing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 237-253.10.1075/aals.18.11mur
  39. Murillo, S., 2019. Reformulation and its markers in unpublished research articles: Some evidence on the rhetorical patterns of written academic ELF. LFE: Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 26-43.
  40. Neff-van Aertselaer, J., 2015. Learner corpora and discourse. In: S. Granger, G. Gilquin and F. Meunier, eds. The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 255-280.10.1017/CBO9781139649414.012
  41. Paltridge, B. and Starfield, S., 2020. Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315170022
  42. Paquot, M., 2008. Exemplification in learner writing: A cross-linguistic perspective. In: F. Meunier and S. Granger, eds. Phraseology in foreign language learning and teaching. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 101-119.10.1075/z.138.09paq
  43. Rayson, P., 2008. Log-likelihood and effect size calculator. ucrel.lancs.ac.uk [Accessed 19 April 2022]. Available at: http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/llwizard.html
  44. Triki, N., 2019. Revisiting the metadiscursive aspect of definitions in academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 37, pp. 104-116.10.1016/j.jeap.2018.11.010
  45. Triki, N., 2021. Exemplification in research articles: Structural, semantic and metadiscursive properties across disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 54, [101039].10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101039
Language: English
Page range: 18 - 35
Published on: Dec 26, 2022
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2022 Tereza Guziurová, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.