Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Slovak ‘no’ and its pragmatic meanings and functions in relation to prosody Cover

Slovak ‘no’ and its pragmatic meanings and functions in relation to prosody

Open Access
|Jun 2020

References

  1. Allgood, R. and Heaton, P., 2015. Developmental change and cross-domain links in vocal and musical emotion recognition performance in childhood. onlinelibrary.wiley.com [Accessed 18 February 2019]. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bjdp.1209710.1111/bjdp.12097
  2. Andersen, G., 2001. Pragmatic Markers and Sociolinguistic Variation: A Relevance-theoretic Approach to the Language of Adolescents. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/pbns.84
  3. Austin, L. J., 1975. How to Do Thing with Words. New York: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001
  4. Beňuš, Š., 2012. Prosodic forms and pragmatic meanings: the case of the discourse marker ‘no’ in Slovak. Paper presented at 3rd IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications, CogInfoCom. Košice, Slovakia, 2-5 December.10.1109/CogInfoCom.2012.6421961
  5. Beňuš, Š., Gravano, A. and Hirschberg, J., 2007. Prosody, emotions, and… whatever. Paper presented at 8th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association. Antwerp, Belgium, 27-31 August.10.21437/Interspeech.2007-691
  6. Blake, L.M., 2017. The Right Hemisphere and Disorders of Cognition and Communication: Theory and Clinical Practice. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.
  7. Brinton, J. L., 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110907582
  8. Briton, N. J. and Hall, J. A., 1995. Beliefs about female and male nonverbal communication. link.springer.com [Accessed 18 February 2019]. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF0154475810.1007/BF01544758
  9. Cole, J., 2015. Prosody in Context: A review. tandfonline.com [Accessed 17 February 2019]. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23273798.2014.963130?scroll=top&needAccess=true
  10. De Ruiter, J. P., Mutterer, H. and Enfield, N. J., 2006. Projecting the end of a speaker’s turn: A cognitive cornerstone of conversation. Language, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 515-535.10.1353/lan.2006.0130
  11. Dupuis, K. and Pichora-Fuller, M. K., 2010. Use of affective prosody by young and older adults. psycnet.apa.org [Accessed 03 March 2019]. Available at: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2010-04859-002
  12. Duranti, A., 1992. Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Findra, J., 2004. Štylistika slovenčiny. Martin: Osveta.
  14. Gravano, A., Beňuš, Š., Chávez, H., Hirschberg, J. and Wilcox, L., 2007. On the role of context and prosody in the interpretation of ´okay´. Paper presented at 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics. Prague, Czech Republic, 23-30 June.
  15. Golato, A. and Fagyal, Z., 2008. Comparing Single and Double Sayings of the German Response Token ja and the Role of Prosody: A Conversation Analytic Perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 241-270.10.1080/08351810802237834
  16. Hirschberg, J. and Litman, D., 1993. Empirical Studies on the Disambiguation of Cue Phrases. dl.acm.org [Accessed 30 January 2019]. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=972490
  17. Hirst, G., 1997. Context as a Spurious Concept. ftp.cs.toronto.edu. [Accessed 12 February 2019]. Available at: http://ftp.cs.toronto.edu/pub/gh/Hirst-Context-97.pdf
  18. Hockey, A. B., 1993. Prosody and the role of the okay and uh-huh in discourse. citeseerx.ist.psu.edu [Accessed 12 February 2019]. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.31.2337&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  19. Hölker, K., 1988. Zur Analyse Von Markern: Korrektur- und Schlussmarker des Französischen. Stuttgart : F. Steiner Verlag Wiesbaden.
  20. Jucker, A. H. and Ziv, Y., 1998. Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/pbns.57
  21. Laussen, A. and Schacht, A., 2018. Biological sex Differences in the Recognition of Vocal Emotions. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov [Accessed 03 March 2019]. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5996252/
  22. Lee, L., Bartkova, K., Jouvet, D., Dargnat, M. and Keromnes, Y., 2019. Can prosody meet pragmatics? Case of discourse particles in French. Paper presented at International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Melbourne, Australia, 5-9 August.
  23. Mistrík, J., 1997. Štylistika. Bratislava: SPN.
  24. Paulmann, S., Pell, M. D. and Kotz, S.A., 2008. How aging affects the recognition of emotional speech. mcgill.ca [Accessed 18 February 2019]. Available at: https://www.mcgill.ca/pell_lab/files/pell_lab/paulmann_pell__kotz_2008b.pdf10.1016/j.bandl.2007.03.002
  25. Récanati, F., 1987. Meaning and Force: The Pragmatics of Performative Utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Archive.
  26. Romero, P., 2010. Phantom Stress: Brain Training to Master Relationship Stress. Bloomington, IN, USA: Xlibris Corporation.
  27. Sridhar, V. K. R., Bangalore, S. and Narayanan, S., 2009. Combining lexical, syntactic and prosodic cues for improved online dialog act tagging. ict.usc.edu [Accessed 02 March 2019]. Available at: http://ict.usc.edu/pubs/Combining%20lexical,%20syntactic%20and%20prosodic%20cues%20for%20improved%20online%20dialog%20act%20tagging.pdf
  28. Svartvik, J. and Stenström A. B., 1985. Words, words, words: The rest is silence? In: S. Bäckman and G. Kjellmer, eds. Papers on language and literature. Presented to Alvar Ellegärd and Erik Frykman. Göteborg : Humanities Pr, pp. 342-353.
  29. Volín, J., Weingartová, L. and Niebuhr, O., 2016. The Prosody of the Czech Discourse Marker ‘Jasně’: An Analysis of Forms and Functions. Phonetica vol. 73, no. 3-4, pp. 314-337.10.1159/000449002
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 14
Published on: Jun 22, 2020
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2020 Lucia Mareková, Štefan Beňuš, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.