References
- Abney, S. P., 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
- Alexiadou, A., 2001. Functional structure in nominals: Nominalization and ergativity. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.10.1075/la.42
- Allen, M. R., 1978. Morphological investigations. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.
- Baker, M. C., 1985. The Mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 373-415.
- Barker, Ch., 2016. Why relational nominals make good concealed questions. Lingua, SI: Understanding Possession, vol. 182, pp. 12-29.10.1016/j.lingua.2016.01.002
- Bobaljik, J. D., 1995. Morphosyntax: The syntax of verbal inflection. Ph.D. dissertation, M.I.T.
- Borer, H., 1984. Parametric syntax: Case studies in Semitic and Romance languages. Studies in Generative Grammar 13. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110808506
- Borer, H., 2005-2013. Structuring sense: Volume I-III. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263936.001.0001
- Chomsky, N., 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783112316009
- Chomsky, N., 1970. Remarks on nominalizations. In: Studies on semantics in generative grammar. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 11-61.
- Chomsky, N., 1995. The minimalist program. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
- Chomsky, N., 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130, pp. 33-49.10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003
- Dubinsky, S., and R. Simango, 1996. Passive and stative in Chichewa: Evidence for modular distinctions in grammar. Language 72, pp. 749-781.10.2307/416101
- Emonds, J. E., 1987. The invisible category principle. Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 18, pp. 613-632.
- Emonds, J. E., 1991. The autonomy of the (syntactic) lexicon and syntax: Insertion conditions for derivational and inflectional morphemes. In: C. Georgopoulos and R. Ishihara, eds. Interdisciplinary approaches to language: Essays in honor of S. Y. Kuroda. Amsterdam: Kluwer, pp. 119-148.10.1007/978-94-011-3818-5_7
- Emonds, J. E., 2000. Lexicon & grammar: The English syntacticon. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110872996
- Emonds, J. E., 2018. The dual nature of derivational morphology: English agentive –er. Anglophone Conference 2018 at Univerzity Hradec Králové, March 22-23, 2018. Proceedings forthcoming.
- Grimshaw, J., 1991. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Halle, M. and Marantz, A., 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In: K. Hale and S.J. Keyser, eds. The view from building 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 111-176.
- Harley, H., 2007. Distributed morphology. Lecture Notes. Ms. University of Arizona. [Accessed 2 September 2018]. Available at: http://heidiharley.com/heidiharley/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/2007-DistributedMorphologyABRALIN2007.pdf
- Harley, H. and Noyer, R., 2000. Formal versus encyclopedic properties of vocabulary: Evidence from nominalizations. In: B. Peters, ed. The lexicon-encyclopedia interface. Oxford: Elsevier Press, pp. 349-374.10.1163/9780585474465_014
- Hazout, I., 1995. Action nominalizations and the lexicalist hypothesis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol.13, no.3, pp. 355-404.10.1007/BF00992736
- Karlík, P., 2000. Valence substantiv v modifikované valenční teorii. In: Čeština: univerzália a specifika. Sborník konference ve Šlapanicích u Brna 17.-19.11.1999, pp. 181-192.
- Karlík, P., and Nübler, N.,1998. Poznámky k nominalizaci v češtině. Slovo a slovesnost, vol. 59, no.2, pp. 105-112.
- Lawrence, R. W., 2017. Nominalization, specification, and investigation. PhD diss. Universiy of California, Berkeley.
- Lees, R., 1960. The grammar of English nominalizations. International Journal of Americal Linguistics vol. 26, no. 3. Reprint in Indiana University Research Center, Bloomington.
- Lieber, R., 2004. Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
- Lieber, R., 2016. English nouns: The ecology of nominalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.10.1017/CBO9781316676288
- Marantz, A., 2007. Phases and words. In: S.H. Choe, ed. Phases in the theory of grammar. Seoul: Dong- In Publishing, pp. 191-222.
- Rozwadowska, B., 2018. What psych nominals can tell us about the event structure of psych verbs. The paper presented in Olomouc Linguistic Colloquium, June 2018. To appear in Proceedings.
- Sapir, E., 1923. The Algonkin affinity of Yurok and Wiyot kinship terms. Journal de la Société des Américanistes de Paris, vol.15, pp. 37-74.10.3406/jsa.1922.3991
- Sichel, I., 2010. Event strucure constraints in nominalizations. In: A. Alexiadou and M. Rathers, eds. The syntax of nominalizations across languages and frameworks. Berlin: Mouton, pp. 151-190.10.1515/9783110245875.159
- Siegel, D., 1979. Topics in English morphology. New York: Garland.
- Snyder, W., 1998. On the aspectual properties of English derived nominals. In: O. Sauerland and O. Percus, eds. The interpretive tract: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 25, pp. 125-139.
- Veselovská, L., 2001. K analýze českých deverbálních substantiv. Čeština: Univerzália a specifika 3, pp. 11–28.
- Veselovská, L., 1998. Possessive movement in the Czech nominal phrase. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 255–300.
- Veselovská, L., 2018. Noun phrases in Czech: Their structure and agreements. Berlin: Peter Lang, forthcoming.10.3726/b14278
- Veselovská, L. and Emonds, J., 2016. Morphology, divided and conquered. Linguistica Brunensia, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 143-162.
- Veselovská, L. and Karlík, P., 2004. Analytic passives in Czech. Zeitschrift für Slawistik, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 163–235.10.1524/slaw.2004.49.2.163
- Wasow, T. A., 1977. Transformations and the lexicon. In: P. Culicover, T. Wasow, and J. Bresnan, eds. Formal syntax. New York: Academic Press, pp. 327-360.
- Williams, E., 1981. On the notions ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of a word.’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 12, pp. 245-274.