Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Three-Point Bending and Cohesive Zone Analysis of Resistance-Welded Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polycarbonate to Aluminum 7075 Single-Lap Joints Cover

Three-Point Bending and Cohesive Zone Analysis of Resistance-Welded Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polycarbonate to Aluminum 7075 Single-Lap Joints

Open Access
|Sep 2026

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

Prepared resistance-welded PC/CF-Al7075 single-lap coupons.

Fig. 2.

Three-point-bending arrangement and principal coupon dimensions; dimensions in mm.

Table 1.

Specimen and three-point-bending fixture geometry.

ParameterValueUnit
Number of coupons included in final curves6-
Total coupon length189mm
Lower support span70mm
Distance from loading nose to each support35mm
Lower support diameter10mm
Loading-nose diameter10mm
Nominal PC/CF adherend thickness1.8mm
Nominal aluminum adherend thickness1.0mm
Nominal total thickness in the overlap2.8mm
Nominal overlap length25mm
Average measured welded overlap area used for data reduction645.16mm2
Idealized model overlap area625.00mm2
Nominal stress conversion factor535.71MPa/kN
Nominal coupon width25.0mm
Lower support geometrycylindrical roller, Figs. 2–3-
Loading-nose geometrycylindrical nose, Figs. 2–3-
PC/CF laminate lay-up18 × 0.1 mm carbon-fiber twill, 200 g/m2, polycarbonate matrix-
Fig. 3.

Three-point-bending test of a welded PC/CF-Al7075 single-lap coupon.

Fig. 4.

Experimental stress [MPa]-displacement [mm] curves obtained from the three-point-bending tests with the CZM model response.

Table 2.

Experimental indicators obtained from three-point-bending curves.

SpecimenWork to peak force, N mmDisplacement at peak force, mmPeak force, NCalculated bending stress, MPaApparent work per overlap area, mJ/mm2
K-04 LSS-SPR-01510.13.45293.7157.30.791
K-07 LSS-SPR-01455.83.26261.5140.10.707
K-03 LSS-SPR-02518.53.45293.7157.30.804
K-06 LSS-SPR-01428.43.14246.1131.80.664
K-07 LSS-SPR-02507.23.17282.8151.50.786
K-10 LSS-SPR-01396.92.85266.3142.70.615
Mean469.53.22274.0146.80.728
SD50.20.2219.210.30.078
CV, %10.77.07.07.010.7
Table 3.

Material properties used in the finite element model.

Model inputPC/CF laminateAluminum 7075UnitSource
Young's modulus4872GPa[15]
Poisson's ratio0.300.30-[15]
Coefficient of thermal expansion1.5 × 10−623 × 10−6K−1[15]
Nominal adherend thickness1.81.0mm[15]
Material designationpolycarbonateAl7075-[15]
Reinforcement architecturecarbon HT 3k, twill 2/2, 200 g/m2--[15]
PC/CF tensile strength440-MPa[15]
PC/CF flexural strength615-MPa[15]
PC/CF compressive strength215-MPa[15]
PC/CF glass-transition temperature143-°C[15]
Table 4.

Finite element mesh statistics used in the ANSYS model.

Mesh parameterValueDescription
Element typeSOLID18620-node higher-order hexahedral solid element
Element formulationHex20Quadratic hexahedral solid element
Nominal refined mesh size0.25 mmElement size used in the refined overlap region
Total nodes344,697Total number of mesh nodes
Total elements67,728Total number of finite elements reported in the ANSYS mesh statistics
Fig. 5.

Finite element mesh of the overlap region; nominal refined mesh size 0.25 mm.

Fig. 6.

ANSYS three-point-bending boundary conditions and displacement actuator position; displacement in mm and reaction force in N.

Fig. 7.

Residual displacement contour after simulated welding and cooling; displacement in mm.

Table 5.

ANSYS fracture-based debonding parameters used in the calibrated model.

ParameterValueUnit
Debonding interface modeCombined normal and tangential-
Tangential slip under normal compressionEnabled-
Maximum normal contact stress4MPa
Critical fracture energy for normal separation5.103E-05mJ/mm2
Maximum equivalent tangential contact stress6MPa
Critical fracture energy for tangential slip0.00065103mJ/mm2
Artificial damping coefficient0.7s
Power law exponent for combined debonding1.5-
Fig. 8.

Numerical deformation of the specimen near failure; displacement in mm.

Fig. 9.

Shear stress distribution in the welded overlap region; stress in MPa.

Fig. 10.

Out-of-plane normal stress distribution in the welded overlap region; stress in MPa.

Fig. 11.

Equivalent von Mises stress distribution in the welded overlap region; stress in MPa.

Language: English
Page range: 125 - 144
Submitted on: Jul 8, 2026
Accepted on: Sep 1, 2026
Published on: Sep 28, 2026
Published by: ŁUKASIEWICZ RESEARCH NETWORK – INSTITUTE OF AVIATION
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Marcin Praski, Piotr Kowalczyk, Radosław Szumowski, Andrzej Leski, published by ŁUKASIEWICZ RESEARCH NETWORK – INSTITUTE OF AVIATION
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.