Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Numerical Simulation of Composite Structural Failure: A Review of Methods and Correlation with Destructive Tests Cover

Numerical Simulation of Composite Structural Failure: A Review of Methods and Correlation with Destructive Tests

Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. Misra A. Composite materials for aerospace propulsion related to air and space transportation. In: Njuguna J, editor. Lightweight Composite Structures in Transport – Design, Manufacturing, Analysis and Performance. Woodhead Publishing; 2016. p. 305–327.
  2. Mangalgiri PD. Composite materials for aerospace applications. Bull Mater Sci. 1999;22(3):657–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02749982
  3. Soutis C. Fibre reinforced composites in aircraft construction. Prog Aerosp Sci. 2005;41(2):143–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.004
  4. Marsh G. Boeing’s 787: Trials, tribulations, and restoring the dream. Reinf Plast. 2009;53(8): 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-3617(09)70311-X
  5. Hale JE. Boeing 787 from the Ground Up. Aero (Boeing) Magazine. 2006;Q4:17–23.
  6. Castanie B, Azoti W, Crouzeix L, Bello A, Taborda RP, Mahmood A, Viste A. Review of monolithic composite laminate and stiffened structures in aeronautic applications. Compos C. 2025;17:100585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomc.2025.100585
  7. Mouritz AP. Introduction to Aerospace Materials. Woodhead Publishing; 2012.
  8. General Electric. GE9X Commercial Aircraft Engine. https://www.geaviation.com/commercial/engines/ge9x
  9. Aerospace Manufacturing and Design. GE delivers 2,000th GEnx engine. 2019.
  10. GE Aerospace News – “GE9X Engine Achieves FAA Certification”, 28 Sep 2020. https://www.geaerospace.com/news/press-releases/commercial-engines/ge9x-engine-achieves-faa-certification
  11. Aerospace Manufacturing and Design. CFM delivers first production LEAP-1A engines to Airbus. 2016.
  12. Aviation Week. Rolls-Royce Tests New Trent 1000 with Composite Fan Case Materials. 2019.
  13. Gay D, Hoa SV, Tsai SW. Composite materials: design and applications. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2002.
  14. Zheng J, Liu X, Xu P, Liu P, Zhao Y, Yang J. Development of high-pressure gaseous hydrogen storage technologies. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2012;37(1):1048–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.02.125
  15. Hollaway LC. Polymer Composites for Civil and Structural Engineering. Springer; 1993.
  16. United Launch Alliance. Graphite Epoxy Motor (GEM) Solid Rocket Boosters, https://www.ulalaunch.com/rockets/vulcan-centaur
  17. nAsA. Composite Cryogenic Propellant Tank Project 2 Jul 2013, https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-tests-game-changing-composite-cryogenic-fuel-tank/
  18. Gibson RF. A review of recent research on mechanics of multifunctional composite materials and structures. Compos Struct. 2010;92(12):2793–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.05.003
  19. Troost P. Practical Applications: New NDT Techniques on Composite Material. TiaT Europe; 2014.
  20. Wronkowicz-Katunin A, Dragan K. Evaluation of Impact Damage in Composite Structures Using Ultrasonic Testing. Fatigue of Aircraft Structures. 2018;10:82–92. https://doi.org/10.2478/fas-2018-0008
  21. Rose CA, Dávila CG, Leone FA. Analysis Methods for Progressive Damage of Composite Structures. NASA/TM–2013-218024.
  22. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Aviation Maintenance Technician Handbook-Airframe, Chapter 7, Volume 1: FAA-H-8083-31. Renton: Aviation Supplies & Academics, Inc.; 2012.
  23. Orsatelli JB, Paroissien E, Lachaud F, Schwartz S. Bonded flush repairs for aerospace composite structures: a review on modelling strategies and application to repairs optimization, reliability and durability. Compos Struct. 2023;304:116338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116338
  24. Whittingham B, Baker AA, Harman A, Bitton D. Micrographic studies on adhesively bonded scarf repairs to thick composite aircraft structure. Compos A. 2009;40(9):1419–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.12.011
  25. Kawakami H, Feraboli P. Lightning strike damage resistance and tolerance of scarf-repaired mesh-protected carbon fiber composites. Compos A. 2011;42(9): 1247–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.05.007
  26. Duong CN, Wang CH. Composite Repair. Elsevier; 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-045146-6.x5000-0
  27. Duong CN, Wang CH. Bonded Joints and Repairs to Composite Airframe Structures. Elsevier; 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-00565-8
  28. Tsai SW, Wu EM. A general theory of strength for anisotropic materials. J Compos Mater. 1971;5(1):58–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199837100500106
  29. Hashin Z. Fatigue failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites. J Appl Mech. 1980;47(2):329–334. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3153664
  30. Puck A, Schürmann H. Failure analysis of FRP laminates by means of physically based phenomenological models. Compos Sci Technol. 2002;62(12-13):1633–1662. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00208-1
  31. Hinton MJ, Kaddour AS, Soden PD, eds. Failure Criteria in Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Composites. Elsevier; 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-080-44475-8.X5000-8
  32. Zobeiry N, Vaziri R, Poursartip A. Characterization of strain-softening behavior and failure mechanisms of composites under tension and compression. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf. 2015;68:29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.09.029
  33. Lemanski SL, Wang J, Sutcliffe MPF, Potter KD, Wisnom MR. Modelling failure of composite specimens with defects under compression loading. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf. 2013;48:26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.12.007
  34. Calvo JV, Feito N, Miguélez MH, Giner E. Delamination failure under compression. Compos Struct. 2022;287:115265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115265
  35. Xiao Y, Ishikawa T. Bearing strength and failure behavior of bolted composite joints (Part I: Experimental investigation). Compos Sci Technol. 2005;65(7-8):1022–1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.02.011
  36. Xiao Y, Ishikawa T. Bearing strength and failure behavior of bolted composite joints (Part II: Modelling and simulation). Compos Sci Technol. 2005;65(7-8):1032–1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.12.049
  37. Liang W, Duan Z, Wang Z, Lin P. Experimental and numerical investigation on bolted joint in glass-fiber reinforced composites. Adv Compos Mater. 2014;24 (Suppl 1):161–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243046.2014.976733
  38. Yoon D, Kim S, Kim J, Doh Y. Bearing strength and failure mode in CFRP laminates. Compos Struct. 2020;239:112023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112023
  39. Yang B, Yue Z, Geng X, Guan X. Experimental and numerical study on bearing failure of countersunk composite-composite and composite-steel joints. J Compos Mater. 2017 Sep;51(22):3211–3224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998316684936
  40. El-Sisi AEA, El-Emam HM, Salim HA, Sallam HEM. Deformation and load transfer analysis of staggered composite-steel lap joints subjected to progressive damage. Eng Struct. 2020;215:110690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110690
  41. El-Din El-Sisi A, El-Emam H, Salim H, El-Din Sallam H, El-Hussieny OM. Behavior of single and double bolted staggered joint in thick composite plates. In: Davidson BD, Ratcliffe JG, Czabaj MW, editors. Proceedings of the American Society for Composites 2016 – Thirty-First Technical Conference on Composite Materials. Lancaster (PA): DEStech Publications; 2016.
  42. Belardi VG, Fanelli P, Vivio F. Analysis of multi-bolt composite joints with a user-defined finite element for the evaluation of load distribution and secondary bending. Compos B: Eng. 2022;227:109378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109378
  43. Gupta A, Singh M, Singh J, Singh S, Prakash C. A critical review on damage modeling and failure analysis of pin joints in fiber reinforced composite laminates. Polym Polym Compos. 2022;30:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/09673911221099764
  44. Cooper C, Turvey GJ. Effects of joint geometry on the strength of bolted composite plates. Compos Struct. 1995;32(1-4):217–226.
  45. Egan B, McCarthy CT, McCarthy MA, Frizzell RM. Stress analysis of single-bolt, single-lap, countersunk composite joints with variable bolt-hole clearance. Compos Struct. 2012;94(3):1038–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.10.004
  46. Camanho PP, Matthews FL. A progressive damage model for mechanically fastened joints in composites. J Compos Mater. 1999;33(24):2248–2080. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199839903302402
  47. Shipsha A, Burman M. Failure mechanisms in NCF composite bolted joints: Experiments and FE model. Compos B: Eng. 2020;192:107950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107950
  48. Lawlor VP, Stanley WF, McCarthy MA. Characterisation of damage development in single shear bolted composite joints. Plast Rubber Compos. 2002;31(3):126–133. https://doi.org/10.1179/146580102225001463
  49. Adam L, Bouvet C, Castanié B, Daidié A, Bonhomme E. Discrete ply model of circular pull-through test of fasteners in laminates. Compos Struct. 2012; 94(10):3082–3091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.05.008
  50. Elder DJ, Verdaasdonk AH, Thomson RS. Fastener pull-through in a carbon fibre epoxy composite joint. Compos Struct. 2008;86(1):291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.041
  51. Kelly G, Hallström S. Bearing strength of carbon fibre/epoxy laminates: effects of bolt-hole clearance. Compos B: Eng. 2004;35(4):331–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2003.11.001
  52. Pearce GMK, Johnson AF, Hellier AK, Thomson R.S. A Stacked-Shell Finite Element Approach for Modelling a Dynamically Loaded Composite Bolted Joint Under in-Plane Bearing Loads. Appl Compos Mater. 2013;20: 1025–1039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-013-9316-9
  53. Perogamvros N, Lampeas G, Murphy A. Experimental Investigation of Fastener Pullout Response in Composite Joints under Static and Dynamic Loading Rates. Appl Compos Mater. 2019;26:1349–1365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-019-09784-4
  54. Zhang F, Zhang W, Hu Z, Jin L, Jia X, Wu L, Wan Y. Experimental and numerical analysis of the mechanical behaviors of large scale composite C-beams fastened with multi-bolt joints under four-point bending load. Compos B: Eng. 2019;164:168–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.058
  55. Muflikhun MA, Higuchi R, Yokozeki T, Aoki T. Delamination behavior and energy release rate evaluation of CFRP/SPCC hybrid laminates under ENF test: Corrected with residual thermal stresses. Compos Struct. 2020;236:111890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111890
  56. Liu F, Xie M, Ji Y, Zhou M. Progressive fatigue damage analysis of composite bolted joint using equivalent stress model. Sci Prog. 2020;103(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0036850419874234
  57. Stocchi C, Robinson P, Pinho ST. Detailed finite element investigation of composite bolted joints with countersunk fasteners. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf. 2013;52:143–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.09.013
  58. Giannopoulos IK, Doroni-Dawes D, Kourousis KI, Yasaee M. Effects of bolt torque tightening on the strength and fatigue life of airframe FRP laminate bolted joints. Compos B: Eng. 2017;125:19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.059
  59. Cameron CJ, Larsson J, Loukil MS, Murtagh T, Wennhage P. Bearing strength performance of mixed thin/thick-ply, quasi-isotropic composite laminates. Compos Struct. 2020;261:113312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113312
  60. Dogan C, Kaman MO, Erdem S, Albayrak M. Comparison of Hashin and Puck criterions for failure behavior of pin loaded composite plates. Materwiss Werksttech. 2024;55(3):314–329. https://doi.org/10.1002/mawe.202300104
  61. Lu T, Chen X, Wang H. Predicting compression-after-impact behavior of thermoplastic composite laminates by an experiment-based approach. Compos Sci Technol. 2021;213:108952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108952
  62. Bull DJ, Spearing SM, Sinclair I. Image-enhanced modelling of residual compressive after impact strength in laminated composites. Compos Struct. 2018;192:20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.047
  63. Yang B, Chen Y, Lee J, Fu K, Li Y. In-plane compression response of woven CFRP composite after low-velocity impact: Modelling and experiment. Thin-Walled Struct. 2020;158:107186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.107186
  64. Zhang C, Tan KT. Low-velocity impact response and compression after impact behavior of tubular composite sandwich structures. Compos B: Eng 2020; 193:108026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108026
  65. Guo S, Li X, Liu T, Bu G, Bai J. Parametric study on low-velocity impact (LVI) damage and compression after impact (CAI) strength of composite laminates. Polymers. 2022;14(23):5200. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14235200
  66. Sebaey T, Mahdi E. Using thin-plies to improve the damage resistance and tolerance of aeronautical CFRP composites. Compos Part A. 2016;86:31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.03.027
  67. Cugnoni J, Amacher R, Kohler S, Brunner J, Kramer E, Dransfeld C, Smith W, Scobbie K, Sorensen L, Botsis J. Towards aerospace grade thin-ply composites: Effect of ply thickness, fibre, matrix and interlayer toughening on strength and damage tolerance. Compos Sci Technol. 2018;168:467–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.08.037
  68. Blier R, Monajati L, Mehrabian M, Boukhili R. The tensile behavior of hybrid bonded bolted composite joints: 3D-digital image correlation versus finite element analysis. Materials. 2024;17(7):1675. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17071675
  69. Blier R, Monajati L, Mehrabian M, Boukhili R. Strength optimisation of hybrid bolted/bonded composite joints based on finite element analysis. Materials. 2024;17(13):3354. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17133354
  70. Zhou S, Yang B, Huang Y, Wu X. Fatigue Analysis of Composite Bolted Joints under Random and Constant Amplitude Fatigue Loadings. Materials. 2024;17(11):2740. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17112740
  71. Giannaros E, Gkertzos P, Kotzakolios A, Kostopoulos V. Design by analysis of a multi-layer fabric reinforcement ofjet engine containment for fragments mitigation. Compos Struct. 2021;275:114390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114390
  72. Elamin M, Li B, Tan KT. Compression after impact performance of carbon-fiber foam-core sandwich composites in low temperature arctic conditions. Compos Struct. 2021;261:113568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113568
Language: English
Page range: 86 - 118
Submitted on: Sep 1, 2025
Accepted on: Apr 21, 2026
Published on: Jun 17, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Robert Jan Młot, published by ŁUKASIEWICZ RESEARCH NETWORK – INSTITUTE OF AVIATION
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.