Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Conceptual Design and Validation of a Hydrogen Training Airplane

Open Access
|Oct 2025

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

Hydrogen-electric airplane propulsion system compared to conventional.
Hydrogen-electric airplane propulsion system compared to conventional.

Fig. 2.

Depiction of power loading vs wing loading.
Depiction of power loading vs wing loading.

Fig. 3.

Schematic of airplane configuration #1.
Schematic of airplane configuration #1.

Fig. 4.

Schematic of airplane configuration #2.
Schematic of airplane configuration #2.

Fig. 5.

Schematic of airplane configuration #3.
Schematic of airplane configuration #3.

Fig. 6.

Schematic of airplane configuration #3.
Schematic of airplane configuration #3.

Fig. 7.

Shape comparison of the hydrogen trainer, Cessna 150, and D20 Katana.
Shape comparison of the hydrogen trainer, Cessna 150, and D20 Katana.

Fig. 8.

Stability and controllability margins as functions of airspeed for maximum and minimum take-off weights.
Stability and controllability margins as functions of airspeed for maximum and minimum take-off weights.

Fig. 9.

Elevator deflection for longitudinal trim for maximum and minimum take-off weights.
Elevator deflection for longitudinal trim for maximum and minimum take-off weights.

Fig. 10.

Pilot force on control stick for maximum and minimum take-off weights.
Pilot force on control stick for maximum and minimum take-off weights.

Airplane configuration scorecard

WeightConfig. #1Config. #2Config. #3Config. #4
Safety0.533.524
Performance0.344.543
Appearance & handling0.24.53.54.52
TOTAL WEIGHTED AVERAGE SCORE 3.63.83.13.3

Comparison of moments of inertia_

AircraftMTOW [kg]Ixx [kg·m2]Iyy [kg·m2]Izz [kg·m2]Ixx/MTOWIyy/MTOWIzz/MTOW
Cessna 150757.0825.0850.0950.01.091.121.26
DA20 Katana780.0325.0900.01100.00.421.151.41
One pilot, 55 kg518.6604.6739.61288.41.171.432.48
Two pilots, 110 kg each683.6599.2788.41331.10.881.151.95

Weight estimation summary_

COMPONENTWeight [kg]AVERAGE
Electric motor9.549.54
Fuel cell stack50.3150.31
Hydrogen tank with fuel104.71104.71
Battery packs10.5910.59
Propeller11.3411.34
ALL POWERPLANT186.50186.50
Method #1 SadraeyMethod #2 RaymerMethod #3 Roskam/CessnaMethod #4 Roskam/USAF
Wing54.685.27138.1672.1787.55
Horizontal stabilizer65.515.5110.9220.6528.15
Vertical stabilizer13.54.854.425.567.08
Fuselage99.643.8131.3960.6158.86
Main landing gear34.523.9729.7815.6525.98
Nose landing gear8.64.2515.505.028.35
ALL STRUCTURE276.39177.66230.17179.66215.97
Flight control system 7.6110.0843.5020.40
Hydraulic and pneumatic systems0.730.60 0.67
Electrical system10.0442.7716.0833.6325.63
Avionics1.7110.681.811.814.01
Air conditioning and AI0.9812.14 8.987.37
Cabin (seats and furnishings)24.255.4413.8924.2516.96
ALL EQUIPEMENT37.7279.2441.86112.1767.75
STRUCTURE + EQUIPEMENT314.11256.89272.03291.83283.72
STRUCTURE + EQUIPEMENT + POWERPLANT500.61443.39458.53478.33470.21

Airplane center of gravity and moments of inertia_

CG positionConfig.Xcg [m]Ycg [m]Zcg [m]Ixx [kg·m2]Iyy [kg·m2]Izz [kg·m2]IxyIxzIyz
Most forwardOne pilot, 55 kg2.01−0.110.03604.6739.61288.49.537.490.93
Most aftTwo pilots, 110 kg each2.102−0.10599.2788.41331.10.0012.230.00

Results of training airplane trend analysis

ParameterUnitAverageMinMaxStandard deviationStandard deviation as % of average
Lengthm6.495.507.500.457%
Heightm2.301.702.960.2611%
Wingspanm9.207.5513.000.9610%
Wing chordm1.280.881.650.1915%
Aspect ratio-7.455.0014.101.6222%
Wing aream211.718.0417.092.0417%
Empty weightkg343.3200.0658.091.127%
MTOW weightkg580.2431.01043.0140.724%
Max wing loadingkg/m255.7536.0095.9011.3120%
Max power loadingkg/kW7.934.4610.991.3016%
Max rate of climbm/min336.3137.0640.095.528%
Max level speedkm/h231.4169.0375.040.017%
Cruise speedkm/h204.0120.0332.037.418%
Stall speedkm/h75.852.0130.012.316%
Rangekm1054424205535934%
Enduranceh5.683.0014.002.0636%
PowerkW81.1144.69156.5726.9233%
Wempty/WMTOW-0.5920.4370.7470.05810%

Wing and stabilizer parameters

ComponentArea [m2]MAC [m]Span [m]ProfileTaper ratioSweep angle [°]Incidence angle [°]Dihedral angle [°]Volume coefficient
Wing13.041.329.85NACA 63(2)-4151014-
Horizonal stabilizer3.110.913.42NACA 001210000.65
Vertical stabilizer1.421.041.46FX-71-L-150/300.4130000.04

Fuel system weight estimation

MTOW = 600 KG
Airplane structureTwo pilotsClassical propulsion system
Combustion engineFuel systemFuel
62.23 kg12.92 kg100 kg
261.55 kg163.3 kgHydrogen-electric propulsion system
Electric motorBatteryFuel cell stackHydrogen tankHydrogen
9.66 kg10.6 kg50.3 kg98.3 kg6.275 kg
Language: English
Page range: 21 - 40
Submitted on: Aug 7, 2025
Accepted on: Sep 23, 2025
Published on: Oct 31, 2025
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Sebastian Piotr Kuk, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.