Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Intellectual Field, Networks, and Reputation Economy in Romania After 1989 Cover

Intellectual Field, Networks, and Reputation Economy in Romania After 1989

By: Marius Lazăr  
Open Access
|Feb 2020

References

  1. Observator cultural, No. 102 (37) and 103 (38) / 2002.10.1002/j.1834-4453.2002.tb00512.x
  2. Observator cultural, Opinii despre o carte cu probleme: Omul recent. [Opinions about a book with problems: The Recent Man], No. 102 (37) / 2002.
  3. Observator cultural. Premiile Asociației Scriitorilor Profesioniști din România – ASPRO pentru anul editorial 2003. [Prizes of the Association of Professional Writers of Romania - ASPRO for the editorial year 2003]. No. 223 June 1, 2004 - June 7, 2004.
  4. Adameșteanu, Gabriela (2014). Anii romantici. Amintiri, gânduri [The Romantic Years. Memories, Thoughts]. Iași: Polirom.
  5. Altafini, C. (2012). Dynamics of Opinion Forming in Structurally Balanced Social Networks. PLoS ONE 7(6): e38135. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038135.10.1371/journal.pone.0038135
  6. Andreescu, Gabriel (2010). 20 de ani de războaie culturale. Victoria junk-conservatorismului [20 years of cultural wars. The victory of junk-conservatism], In Matei, S. A., & Momescu, M. (eds.). Forum idols: Why a middle class spirit is preferable to the “elite” of public intellectuals. Indianapolis: Ideagora. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-54248-8, pp. 67-81.
  7. Bonacich, Phillip (1987). Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92(5 (Mar., 1987), pp. 1170-1182.10.1086/228631
  8. Bourdieu, Pierre (2015). Sociologie générale. Cours au Collège de France, (1981-1983), volume 1, Editions Raisons d’agir / Seuil, 2015.
  9. Bourdieu, Pierre (2016) Sociologie générale. Cours au Collège de France, (1983-1986), volume 2, Paris: Editions Raisons d’agir/Seuil.
  10. Bourdieu, Pierre (1984) [1979]. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste, Richard Nice, trans. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
  11. Bourdieu, Pierre (1992). Les règles de l’art. Genèse et structure du champ littéraire, Paris : Les éditions du Seuil.
  12. Bourdieu, Pierre (1994). «Strategies de reproduction et modes de domination», in Actes de la recherches en sciences sociales, nr. 105, dec. 1994.
  13. Ciubuc, Bogdan (2004). Cearta inteelctualilor [The Quarrel of the Intellectuals], Evenimentul zilei [Daily Event] of June 27, 2004.
  14. Daloz, Jean-Pascal (2010). The Sociology of Elite Distinction. From Theoretical to Comparative Perspectives. Basigstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230246836
  15. DeNooy, Wouters (2002). The dynamics of artistic prestige. Poetics, 30(3):147-167. DeNooy, Wouters (2003). Fields and networks: correspondence analysis and social network analysis. Poetics, 31(5–6): 305-327.
  16. Dinu, Maria (2017). Ion Bogdan Lefter: Pumn de fier în mănușă de catifea [Ion Bogdan Lefter: Iron fist in velvet glove]. Mozaic, No. 3 /2017.
  17. Gheorghiu, Mihai Dinu (2007). Intelectualii în cîmpul puterii. Morfologii și traiectorii sociale. Iași: Polirom.
  18. Gheorghiu, Mihai Dinu (2005). Le Groupe de Dialogue Social et les intellectuels roumains « libres » après 1989. In Gheorghiu, Mihai Dinu (eds). (2003). Littérature et pouvoir symbolique, Bucuresti: Ed. Paralela 45.
  19. Groza, Claudiu (2004). Turbarea intelectualilor [The Turbulence of the Intellectuels]. Clujeanul, Nr. 224/June, 28 – July, 5.
  20. Katz, Leo (1953). A New Status Index Derived from Sociometric Index. Psychometrika 18(1): 39–43.
  21. Kurzman, Charles and Lynn Owens (2002). The Sociology of Intellectuals. Annual Review of Sociology 28: 63-90.
  22. Kurzman, Charles (2008). Democracy Denied, 1905-1915: Intellectuals and the Fate of Democracy. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674039858
  23. Lavastine, Alexandra (2002). Cioran, Eliade, Ionesco: L’Oubli du fascisme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France – PUF.
  24. Lazăr, Marius (2015). Writers, Intellectuals, Politics: The Transformation of the Cultural Field in Post-Communist Romania. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai. Sociologia (1):125-149, June 2015.
  25. Liiceanu, Gabriel (1983). Jurnalul de la Păltiniș, București, Cartea Romanească.
  26. Liiceanu, Gabriel (1983). Jurnalul de la Păltiniș. Un model paideic in cultura umanista [The Journal of Păltiniș: A paideia model in humanistic culture] Bucharest: Romanian Book Publishing House.
  27. Livezeanu, Irina. (2003). Romania’s Cultural Wars: Intellectual Debates about the Recent Past, Working Papers Series of the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research, March 27, 2003.
  28. Marcu, Luminița. (2004). Romanian intellectuals provoked from overseas, Evenimentul zilei [The Daily Event], May 2, 2004.
  29. Matei, Sorin. 2004. Boierii minţii. Intelectualii români între grupurile de prestigiu şi piaţa liberă a ideilor [Boyars of the mind. Romanian intellectuals between status groups and the free market of ideas], Bucharest: Compania.
  30. Patapievici, Horia Roman. (2001) Omul recent. O critica a modernității din perspectiva întrebării «Ce se pierde atunci când ceva se câștigă? »[The Recent Man. A critique of modernity by answering the question: «What is lost when something is won»]. Bucgharest: Humanitas Publishing House.
  31. Patapievici, Horia Roman (2002). Liberal or conservative?. In Revista 22, Vol. 622, No. 6, February 5-11, 2002.
  32. Patapievici, Horia Roman. (2004). Cetatea românească a încetat să mai fie o excepție patologica. Iolanda Malamen in dialog cu: Horia Roman Patapievici [The Romanian stronghold ceased to be a pathological exeption. Iolanda Malamen in dialog with Horia Roman Patapievici]. In Ziua, 15 mai.
  33. Pleșu, Andrei (2004). Replică [Reply]. Observator cultural, No. 226, June 22 – June 28, 2004.
  34. Runceanu, Camelia. (2008). «Grup de reflecție», grup solidar? Grupul pentru Dialog Social: o elită intelectuală în post-comunism. In Gheorghiu, Mihai Dinu, Lupu Mihăiță (eds), Mobilitatea elitelor în România secolului al XX-lea, Bucharest : Paralela 45, pp. 392-421.
  35. Sapiro, Gisèle (2009). Modèles d’intervention politique des intellectuels. Le cas français. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 1: 176-177.
  36. Sawyer, Kim Russell and Gygax, André (2019). An option-theoretic model of a reputation network. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 43(3): 123-146, DOI: 10.1080/0022250X.2018.1545769.10.1080/0022250X.2018.1545769
  37. Sawyer, Kim Russell and Gygax, André, (2018). Reputation As an Option (December 17). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3165409 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3165409.10.2139/ssrn.3165409
  38. Scott, John (2000). Social Network Analysis: a Handbook, London: Sage.
  39. Verdery, Katherine (1991). National ideology under socialism. Identity and Cultural Politics in Ceausescu’s Romania, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520917286
  40. Wasserman, Stanley and Faust, Katherine (1994). Social Networks Analysis. Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815478
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/subbs-2019-0012 | Journal eISSN: 2066-0464 | Journal ISSN: 1224-8703
Language: English
Page range: 109 - 140
Published on: Feb 17, 2020
Published by: Babeș-Bolyai University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2020 Marius Lazăr, published by Babeș-Bolyai University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.