Have a personal or library account? Click to login
T/V Pronouns and FTAs in the Works of Sir Thomas Malory: Medieval Politeness and Impoliteness in Directives, Expressives, and Commissives Cover

T/V Pronouns and FTAs in the Works of Sir Thomas Malory: Medieval Politeness and Impoliteness in Directives, Expressives, and Commissives

Open Access
|Mar 2021

References

  1. Austin, John L. 1962. How to do things with words. Clarendon Press.
  2. Bax, Marcel & Dániel Z. Kádár. 2011. The historical understanding of historical (im)politeness: Introductory notes. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12(1–2). 1–24. DOI: 10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.01bax10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.01bax
  3. Bax, Marcel & Dániel Z. Kádár (eds). 2012. Understanding historical (im)politeness. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/bct.4110.1075/bct.41
  4. Bernstein, Basil. 1972. Social class, language and socialization. In Pier Paolo Giglioli (ed.), Language and social context. Penguin. 157–178.
  5. Blanco Salgueiro, Antonio. 2010. Promises, threats, and the foundations of speech act theory. Pragmatics 20(2). 213–228.10.1075/prag.20.2.05bla
  6. Bock, Martin. 1938. Der stilistische Gebrauch des englischen Personalpronomens der 2. Person im volkstümlichen Dialog der älteren englischen Komödie. PhD dissertation, University of Innsbruck.
  7. Bradbrook, Muriel. 1958. Sir Thomas Malory. Longmans, Green & Co..
  8. Braun, Friederike. 1988. Terms of address: Problems of patterns and usage in various languages and cultures. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/978311084811310.1515/9783110848113
  9. Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085
  10. Brown, Roger & Albert Gilman. 1972 [1960]. The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Pier Paolo Giglioli (ed.). Language and social context. Penguin. 252–282.10.1515/9783110805376.252
  11. Brown, Roger & Albert Gilman. 1989. Politeness theory and Shakespeare’s four major tragedies. Language in Society 18(2). 159–212. DOI: 10.1017/S004740450001346410.1017/S0047404500013464
  12. Bukowska, Joanna. 2002. Theatricality of the chivalric world in Thomas Malory’s Le Morte D’Arthur. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies 3. 33–44.
  13. Busse, Ulrich. 2002. Linguistic variation in the Shakespeare Corpus: Morpho-syntactic variability of second person pronouns. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.10610.1075/pbns.106
  14. Burnley, David. 2003. The T/V pronouns in later Middle English literature. In Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on address term systems. John Benjamins. 27–45. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.10710.1075/pbns.107
  15. Byrne, St. Geraldine. 1936. Shakespeare’s use of the pronoun of address. The Catholic University of America.
  16. Culpeper, Jonathan. 2009. Historical sociopragmatics: An introduction. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 10(2). 179–186. DOI: 10.1075/jhp.10.2.02cul10.1075/jhp.10.2.02cul
  17. Culpeper, Jonathan. 2010. Conventionalized impoliteness formulae. Journal of Pragmatics 42(12). 3232–3245. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.00710.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.007
  18. Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511975752
  19. Culpeper, Jonathan. 2012. (Im)politeness: Three issues. Journal of Pragmatics 44(9). 1128–1133.10.1016/j.pragma.2012.05.011
  20. Culpeper, Jonathan & Daniel Z. Kádár (eds.). 2010. Historical (im)politeness. Peter Lang. DOI: 10.3726/978-3-0351-0025-910.3726/978-3-0351-0025-9
  21. Culpeper, Jonathan & Minna Nevala. 2012. Sociocultural processes and the history of English. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth C. Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English. Oxford University Press. 365–391. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.003210.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0032
  22. Del Lungo Camiciotti, Gabriella. 2008. Two polite speech acts from a diachronic perspective: Aspects of the realisation of requesting and undertaking commitments in the nineteenth-century commercial community. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds). 2008. Speech acts in the history of English. John Benjamins. 115–131. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.176.07del10.1075/pbns.176.07del
  23. Field, Peter (ed.). 2013. Sir Thomas Malory: Le Morte Darthur. 2 vols. D. S. Brewer.
  24. Fukada, Atsushi & Noriko Asato. 2004. Universal politeness theory: Application to the use of Japanese honorifics. Journal of Pragmatics 36(11). 1991–2002. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2003.11.00610.1016/j.pragma.2003.11.006
  25. Goffman Erving. 1967. Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. Anchor Books.
  26. Goffman Erving. 1972 [1964]. The neglected situation. In Pier Paolo Giglioli (ed.), Language and social context. Penguin. 61–66.
  27. Goffman Erving. 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organisation of experience. Harper and Row.
  28. Honegger, Thomas. 2003. “And if ye wol nat so, my lady sweete, thanne preye I thee, [...]”. Forms of address in Chaucer’s Knight’s Tale. In Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on address term systems. John Benjamins. 61–84. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.107.05hon10.1075/pbns.107.05hon
  29. Jacobs, Andreas & Andreas H. Jucker. 1995. The historical perspective in pragmatics. In Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical pragmatics. Pragmatic developments in the history of English. John Benjamins. 3–33. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.35.04jac10.1075/pbns.35.04jac
  30. Jucker, Andreas H. 2006. ʽThou art so loothly and so oold also’: The use of ye and thou in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales. Anglistik 17(2). 57–72.
  31. Jucker, Andreas H. 2008. Historical pragmatics. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(5). 894–906. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-818x.2008.00087.x10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00087.x
  32. Jucker, Andreas H. 2009. Speech act research between armchair, field and laboratory: The case of compliments. Journal of Pragmatics 41(8). 1611–1535. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.02.00410.1016/j.pragma.2009.02.004
  33. Jucker, Andreas H. 2010. ʽIn curteisie was set ful muchel hir lest’: Politeness in Middle English. In Jonathan Culpeper & Daniel Z. Kádár (eds.), Historical (im)politeness. Peter Lang. 175-200.
  34. Jucker, Andreas H. 2012. Changes in politeness cultures. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English. Oxford University Press. 422–433. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.003610.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0036
  35. Jucker, Andreas H. 2014. Courtesy and politeness in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 49(3). 5–28. DOI: 10.1515/stap-2015-000710.1515/stap-2015-0007
  36. Jucker, Andreas H. & Irma Taavitsainen. 2000. Diachronic speech act analysis: Insults from flyting to flaming. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1(1). 67–95. DOI: 10.1075/jhp.1.1.07juc10.1075/jhp.1.1.07juc
  37. Jucker, Andreas H. & Irma Taavitsainen. 2008. Speech acts now and then: Towards a pragmatic history of English. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Speech acts in the history of English. John Benjamins. 1–23. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.176.02taa10.1075/pbns.176.02taa
  38. Kádár, Daniel Z. & Marcel Bax. 2013. In-group ritual and relational work. Journal of Pragmatics 58. 73–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.01110.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.011
  39. Kaeuper, Richard & Montgomery Bohna. 2009. War and chivalry. In Peter Brown (ed.), A companion to medieval English literature and culture, c. 1350–c. 1500. Wiley-Blackwell. 273–291.
  40. Kohnen, Thomas. 2000. Explicit performatives in Old English: A corpus-based study of directives. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1(2). 301–321. DOI: 10.1075/jhp.1.2.07koh10.1075/jhp.1.2.07koh
  41. Kohnen, Thomas. 2002. Towards a history of English directives. In Andreas Fischer, Gunnel Tottie & Peter Schneider (eds), Text types and corpora. Studies in honour of Udo Fries. Gunter Narr. 165–175.
  42. Kohnen, Thomas. 2004. “Let mee bee so bold to request you”: Constructions with let me and the history of English directives. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 5(1). 159–173. DOI: 10.1075/jhp.5.1.08koh10.1075/jhp.5.1.08koh
  43. Kohnen, Thomas. 2008. Directives in Old English: Beyond politeness?. In Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds), Speech acts in the history of English. John Benjamins Publishing Co. 27–44. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.176.04koh10.1075/pbns.176.04koh
  44. Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. Longman.
  45. Mahowald, Kyle. 2012. A Naïve Bayes classifier for Shakespeare’s second-person pronoun. Literary and Linguistic Computing 27(1). 17–23. DOI: 10.1093/llc/fqr04510.1093/llc/fqr045
  46. Mazzon, Gabriella. 1995. Pronouns and terms of address in Shakespeare’s English: A socio-affective marking system in transition. VIEWS - Vienna English Working Papers 4. 20–42.
  47. Mazzon, Gabriella. 2009. Interactive dialogue sequence in Middle English drama. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.18510.1075/pbns.185
  48. Mazzon, Gabriella. 2010. Terms of address. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical pragmatics. De Gruyter Mouton. 351–378. DOI: 10.1515/9783110214284.5.35110.1515/9783110214284.5.351
  49. Mustanoja, Tauno. 2016 [1960]. A Middle English syntax: Parts of speech. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/z.20710.1075/z.207
  50. Nevala, Minna. 2004. Accessing politeness axes: Forms of address and terms of reference in early English correspondence. Journal of Pragmatics 36(12). 2125–2160. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.02.00110.1016/j.pragma.2004.02.001
  51. Nakayasu, Minako. 2013. Spatio-temporal system in A treatise on the Astrolabe. Paper presented at ICOME 8, Murcia, Spain.
  52. Nurmi, Arja & Päivi Pahta. 2010. Preacher, scholar, brother, friend: Social roles and code-switching in the writings of Thomas Twining. In Päivi Pahta, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi & Minna Palander-Collin (eds), Social roles and language practices in Late Modern English. John Benjamins. 135–162. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.195.07nur10.1075/pbns.195.07nur
  53. Riddy, Felicity. 1987. Sir Thomas Malory. Brill.10.1163/9789004624351
  54. Schnurr, Stephanie & Angela Chan. 2009. Politeness and leadership discourse in New Zealand and Hong Kong: A cross-cultural case study of workplace talk. Journal of Politeness Research 5(2). 131–157. DOI: 10.1515/JPLR.2009.00910.1515/JPLR.2009.009
  55. Searle, John R. 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438
  56. Searle, John R. 1976. A classification of illocutionary speech acts. Language and Society 5(1). 1–23. DOI: 10.1017/S004740450000683710.1017/S0047404500006837
  57. Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2000. Rapport management: A framework for analysis. In Helen Spencer-Oatey (ed.), Culturally speaking. Managing rapport through talk across cultures. Continuum. 11–46.
  58. Taavitsainen, Irma & Andreas H. Jucker 2008. Speech acts now and then. Towards a pragmatic history of English. In Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Speech acts in the history of English. John Benjamins. 1–23. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.176.02taa10.1075/pbns.176.02taa
  59. Taavitsainen, Irma & Andreas H. Jucker (eds). 2003. Diachronic perspectives on address term systems. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.10710.1075/pbns.107
  60. Taavitsainen, Irma & Andreas H. Jucker (eds). 2008. Speech acts in the history of English. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.17610.1075/pbns.176
  61. Vinaver, Eugene (ed.). 1948 [1947]. The works of Sir Thomas Malory. Clarendon Press.
  62. Walker, Terry. 2003. You and thou in Early Modern English dialogues: Patterns of usage. In Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on address term systems. John Benjamins. 309–342. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.107.13wal10.1075/pbns.107.13wal
  63. Walker, Terry. 2007. Thou and you in Early Modern English dialogues. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.15810.1075/pbns.158
  64. Watts, Richard J. 1989. Relevance and relational work: Linguistic politeness as politic behavior. Multilingua 8(2–3). 131–166. DOI: 10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.13110.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.131
  65. Watts, Richard J. 1992. Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: Reconsidering claims for universality. In Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide & Konrad Ehlich (eds), Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice. Mouton de Gruyter. 43–70. DOI: 10.1515/9783110886542-00510.1515/9783110886542-005
  66. Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO978051161518410.1017/CBO9780511615184
  67. Watts, Richard J. 2005. Linguistic politeness research: Quo vadis? In Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide & Konrad Ehlich (eds), Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice (2nd edn). Mouton de Gruyter. xi–xlvii.10.1515/9783110199819
  68. Włodarczyk, Matylda. 2016. Genre and literacies: Historical (socio)pragmatics of the 1820 settler petition. Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
  69. Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/stap-2020-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2082-5102 | Journal ISSN: 0081-6272
Language: English
Page range: 139 - 176
Published on: Mar 13, 2021
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Malwina Wiśniewska-Przymusińska, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.