References
- Allen, Cynthia. 1997. Middle English case loss and the ‘creolization’ hypothesis. English Language and Linguistics 1.1. 63–89. DOI: 10.1017/S1360674300000368
- Bailey, Charles James & Karl Maroldt. 1977. The French lineage of English. In Jürgen Meisel (ed.), Langues en contact: Pidgins, creoles, Tübingen: TBL. 21–53.
- Bech, Kristin & George Walkden. 2016. English is (still) a West Germanic language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 39.1. 65–100. DOI: 10.1017/S0332586515000219
- Christiansen, Morten H. & Nick Chater. 2009. The myth of language universals and the myth of universal grammar. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32.5. 452–453. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X09990641
- Crystal, David. 1997. English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511486999
- Dalton-Puffer, Christiane. 1995. Middle English is a creole and its opposite: On the value of plausible speculation. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Linguistic change under contact conditions, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 35–50. DOI: 10.1515/9783110885170.35
- Danchev, Andrei. 1997. The Middle English creolization hypothesis revisited. In Jacek Fisiak, (ed.), Studies in Middle English linguistics, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 79–108. DOI: 10.1515/9783110814194.79
- DeGraff, Michel. 2003. Against creole exceptionalism. Language 79.2. 391–410.
- Domingue, N. Z. 1977. Middle English: Another creole? Journal of Creole Studies 1. 89–100.
- Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2015. What exactly is Universal Grammar, and has anyone seen it? Frontiers in Psychology 6:852. 1–17. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00852
- Emonds, Joseph E. & Jan Terje Faarlund. 2014. English: The language of the Vikings. Olomouc: Palacký University Press.
- Evans, Nicholas & Stephen C. Levinson. 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32.5. 429–448. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X0999094X
- Görlach, Manfred. 1986. Middle English – a creole? In Dieter Kastovsky & Aleksander Szwedek (eds.), Linguistics across historical and geographical boundaries, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 329–344.
- Hartman, Megan E. 2016. New applications for word-foot theory. In M. J. Toswell & Lindy Brady (eds.), Early English poetic culture and meter: The influence of G. R. Russom, Kalamazoo: Medieval Institute Publications. 73–92.
- Hock, Hans Henrich & Brian D. Joseph. 1996. Language history, language change, and language relationship: An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co.
- Hogg, Richard M. 1997. Some remarks on case marking in Old English. Transactions of the Philological Society 95.1. 95–109. DOI: 10.1111/1467-968X.00014
- Ingham, Richard. 2014. The maintenance of French in later medieval England. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 115.4. 425–448.
- Lightfoot, David W. 2016. Review of Joseph E. Emonds & Jan Terje Faarlund, English: The language of the Vikings, 2014. In Language 92.2. 474–477.
- Markey, Thomas L. 1982. Afrikaans: Creole or non-creole? Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, 49.2. 169–207.
- McWhorter, John H. 2005. Defining creole. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- McWhorter, John H. 2008. Our magnificent bastard tongue: The untold history of English. New York. NY: Gotham Books.
- Milroy, James. 2001a. Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5.4. 530–555. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9481.00163
- Milroy, James. 2001b. Response to Sally Johnson: Misunderstanding language? Journal of Sociolinguistics 5(4). 620–625. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9481.00170
- O’Neil, David. 2017. A syntactic basis for the distribution of metrical types in Beowulf. The Mediaeval Journal 7.1.29–59. DOI: 10.1484/J.TMJ.5.115346
- O’Neil, David. 2018. English as the lingua franca of international publishing. World Englishes 37.2. 146–165. DOI: 10.1111/weng.12293
- O’Neil, David. 2020, forthcoming. Syntax, prosody, and the Brut: Metrical continuity in the early English alliterative tradition. Enarratio 23.
- Plag, Ingo. 1998. Review of Christiane Dalton-Puffer, The French influence on Middle English morphology: A corpus-based study of derivation, 1996. In Language 74.2. 392–395.
- Phillipson, Robert. 1992. Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Poussa, Patricia. 1982. The evolution of early standard English: The creolization hypothesis. Studia Anglia Posnaniensia 14. 69–85.
- Roberts, Ian. 2016. Introduction. In Ian Roberts (ed.), The Oxford handbook of Universal Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199573776.013.1
- Russom, Geoffrey R. 2017. The evolution of verse structure in Old and Middle English poetry: From the earliest alliterative poems to iambic pentameter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781316562925
- Siegel, Jeff. 2001. Koine formation and creole genesis. In Norval Smith & Tonjes Veenstra (eds.), Creolization and contact, Amsterdam: Benjamins.175–197. DOI: 10.1075/cll.23.08sie
- Stenbrenden, Gjertrud F. 2016. Why English is not dead: A rejoinder to Emonds and Faarlund. Folia Linguistica Historica 37.1. 239–279. DOI: 10.1515/flih-2016-0008
- Tomasello, Michael. 2009. Universal grammar is dead. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32.5. 470–71. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X09990744
- Thomason, Sarah Grey & Terrence Kaufman. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
- Townend, Matthew. 2002. Language and history in Viking Age England: Linguistic relations between speakers of Old Norse and Old English. Turnhout: Brepols.
- Trotter, David M. 2017. Middle English creolization. In Laurel J. Brinton & Alexander Bergs (eds.), Middle English, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 224–238. DOI: 10.1515/9783110525328-012
- Watts, Richard J. 2011. Language myths and the history of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195327601.001.0001