Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Inflation is a Person – On Language-Image Relations in Internet Memes Cover

Inflation is a Person – On Language-Image Relations in Internet Memes

Open Access
|Nov 2025

References

  1. Abdelghany, S., Nayef, H., & Fawzy, R. (2023). Metaphorical representation in Egyptian and American multimodal coronavirus memes: A cyberpragmatic analysis. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 23(2), 339–368.
  2. Barthes, R. (1977). Image, music, text. (Transl. by Stephen Heath). London: Fontana.
  3. Bateman, J. A. (2008). Multimodality and genre: A foundation for the systematic analysis of multimodal documents. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  4. Bateman, J.A. (2014a). Multimodal coherence research and its applications. In H. Gruber & G. Redeker (Eds.), The pragmatics of discourse coherence, (pp. 145–177). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  5. Bateman, J.A. (2014b). Text and image: A critical introduction to the visual/verbal divide. London: Routledge.
  6. Bateman, J.A. (2016). Methodological and theoretical issues in multimodality. In N.-M. Klug & H. Stöckl (Eds.) Handbuch Sprache im Multimodalen Kon-text, (pp. 36–74). Berlin: de Gruyter.
  7. Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford University Press.
  8. Dynel, M. (2021). Covid-19 memes going viral: On the multiple multimodal voices behind face masks. Discourse and Society, Vol. 32,2, 175–195.
  9. El Refaie, E. (2003). Understanding visual metaphors: the example of newspaper cartoons. Visual Communication 2, 75–95.
  10. Fauconnier, G. (2007). Mental spaces. In D. Geeraerts and H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 371–76). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  11. Fillmore, Ch. (1982). Frame semantics. Linguistics in the Morning Calm, 111–135. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company.
  12. Forceville, Ch. (1996). Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London and New York: Routledge.
  13. Forceville, Ch. (2006). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibàńez (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives (pp. 379–402). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  14. Forceville, Ch. (2009a). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In Ch. Forceville & E. UriosĀparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor, 19–42.
  15. Forceville, Ch. (2009b). The role of non-verbal sound and music in multimodal metaphor. In Ch. Forceville & E. UriosĀparisi (Eds.), Multimodal Metaphor, 383–400.
  16. Forceville, Ch. (2014). The strategic use of the visual mode in advertising metaphors. In E. Djonov & S. Zhao (Eds.), Critical multimodal studies of popular culture (pp. 55–70), New York: Routledge.
  17. Forceville, Ch. (2016). Pictorial and multimodal metaphor. In N.-M. Klug and H. Stöckl, (Eds.), Handbuch Sprache im multimodalen Kontext [The Language in multimodal contexts handbook]. Linguistic knowledge series (pp. 241–260). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  18. Forceville, Ch. (2020). Visual and multimodal communication. Applying the relevance principle. Oxford University Press.
  19. Forceville, Ch. (2023). Reflections on developing multimodal metaphor theory into multimodal trope theory. metaphorik.de, 34/2023, 19–42. www.metaphorik.de/en/journal/34/reflections-developing-multimodal-metaphor-theory-multi modal-trope-theory.html
  20. Forceville, Ch. (2024a). Identifying and interpreting visual and multimodal metaphor in commercials and feature films. Metaphor and Symbol, 39 (1), 40–54.
  21. Forceville, Charles (2024b). Identifying and interpreting visual and multimodal metaphor in political cartoons. In M. Romano (Ed.), Metaphor in social-political contexts: Current crises (pp. 255–278). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
  22. Forceville, Ch. & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.) (2009). Multimodal metaphor [Monograph]. Applications of cognitive linguistics 11. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  23. Górska, E. (2020). Understanding abstract concepts across modes in multimodal discourse. A cognitive linguistic approach. Routledge Focus in Linguistics.
  24. Hart, Ch. (2017). Metaphor and intertextuality in media framings of the (1984–1985) British Miners’ Strike: A multimodal analysis. Discourse & Communication, 11(1), 3–30.
  25. Hart, Ch., & Queralto, J. M. (2021). What can cognitive linguistics tell us about language-image relations? A multidimensional approach to intersemiotic convergence in multimodal texts. Cognitive Linguistics 32(4): 529–562.
  26. Jewitt, C. (Ed.) (2009).The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. London: Routledge.
  27. Jewitt, C. (2014). An introduction to multimodality. In C. Jewitt (Ed.) The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 15–30). London and New York: Routledge.
  28. Kopecka, B. (2011). Skirts, Jacks and piece of flesh do make people: Metonymic developments to the macrocategory human being. Rzeszów: University of Rzeszow Press.
  29. Kowalski, G. (2022). Kognitywne modele metafory wizualnej: Teoria, metodologia, analizy. LingVaria, 17(1(33), 53–66.
  30. Kövecses, Z. (2017). Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics 28(2), 321–347. www.researchgate.net/publication/344958954 Levels of metaphor
  31. Kövecses, Z. (2020). Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge University Press.
  32. Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse. The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.
  33. Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (2006 [1996]). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London and New York: Routledge.
  34. Lako, G. & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  35. Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  36. Libura, A. (2019). Metafora multimodalna. Interakcje słowa i obrazu. In J. Winiarska & A. Załazińska (Eds.) Widzieć – rozumieć – komunikować, Vol. 2, (pp. 57–82). Krakow: Księgarnia Akademicka Publishing House.
  37. Maćkiewicz, J. (2017). Badanie mediów multimodalnych – multimodalne badanie mediów. Studia Medioznawcze, 2(69), 33–42.
  38. Musol, A. (2006). Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 21(1), 23–38.
  39. Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. London and New York: Routledge.
  40. Semino E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  41. Šorm E. & Steen G. (2018). VISMIP: Towards a method for visual metaphor identification. In G. Steen (Ed.), Visual metaphor: Structure and process, converging evidence in language and communication research 18, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins (pp. 47–88). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.18.03sor
  42. Stöckl, H., Caple, H., & Pflaeging, J. (Eds.). (2019). Shifts towards image-centricity in contemporary multimodal practices. New York: Routledge.
  43. Stöckl, H. (2020a). 9 Multimodality and mediality in an image-centric semiosphere – A rationale. In C. Thurlow, C. Dürscheid & F. Diémoz (Eds.), Visualizing digital discourse: Interactional, institutional and ideological perspectives (pp. 189–202). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
  44. Stöckl, H. (2020b). Linguistic multimodality – Multimodal linguistics: A state-of-the-art sketch. In J. Wildfeuer, J. Pflaeging, J. Bateman, O. Seizov & C. Tseng (Eds.), Multimodality: Disciplinary thoughts and the challenge of diversity (pp. 41–68). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.
  45. Stöckl, H. (2023). Bold and impactful: a reappraisal of Gunther Kress’s (social) semiotic legacy in the light of current multimodality research. Text & Talk, 1–23. www.researchgate.net/publication/368254927 Bold and impactful a reappraisal of Gunther Kress’s social semiotic legacy in the light of current multimodal
  46. Younes, A.S. & Altakhaineh, A.R.M. (2022). Metaphors and metonymies used in memes to depict Covid-19 in Jordanian social media websites. Ampersand, Vol. 9/2022, 100087.
  47. Zbikowski, L.M. (2009). Music, language, and multimodal metaphor. In Ch. Force-ville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor, 359–381.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2025-0017 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Language: English
Page range: 319 - 347
Published on: Nov 24, 2025
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2025 Beata Kopecka, Dorota Rut-Kluz, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.