Have a personal or library account? Click to login

References

  1. Argyle, M. (2001). The psychology of happiness. London: Routledge.
  2. Argyle, M. (2004). Psychologia szczęścia [The Psychology of Happiness]. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Astrum. ISBN 83-7249-107-0
  3. Argyris, Ch. (1999). On Organizational Learning. 2nd edition. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-0-631-21309-3
  4. Armstrong, M. (2010). Strategiczne zarządzanie zasobami ludzkimi. [Strategic human resource management.] Warszawa: Oficyna a Wolters Kluwer business. ISBN 978-83-7526-718-1
  5. Armstrong, M. (2011). Zarządzanie zasobami ludzkimi. [Human resource management.] Warszawa: Oficyna a Wolters Kluwer business. ISBN 978-83-2640616-4
  6. Badia, M., Orgaz, B.M., Verdugo, M.A., Ullan, A.M. & Martinez, M.M. (2011). Personal factors and perceived barriers to participation in leisure activities for young and adults with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(6), 2055–2063.
  7. Basogain, X., Gurba, K., Hug, T., Morze, N., Noskova, T., & Smyrnova-Trybulska, E. (2020) STEM and STEAM in Contemporary Education: Challenges, Contemporary Trends and Transformation. A Discussion Paper. In E. Smyrnova-Trybulska (ed.) Innovative Educational Technologies, Tools and Methods for E-learning. “E-learning”. Vol. 12. Katowice–Cieszyn: Studio Noa for University of Silesia. (pp. 242–256) ISSN: 2451–3644 (print edition) ISSN 2451–3652 (digital edition) ISBN: 978-83-66055-19-3 http://doi.org/10.34916/el.2020.12.21
  8. Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., & Tanaka, T. (2018). Social robots for education: A review. Science Robotics, 3(21). https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aat5954
  9. Çakir, R., Korkmaz, Ö., İdil, Ö., & Erdoğmuş, F. U. (2021). The Effect of Robotic Coding Education on Preschoolers’ Problem Solving and Creative Thinking Skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100812
  10. Campbell, A., Converse P.E., & Rodgers W.L. (1976). The Quality of American Life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. ISBN 978-0-87154-194-9
  11. Chen, H., Park, H. Won & Breazeal, C. (2020). Teaching and learning with children: Impact of reciprocal peer learning with a social robot on children’s learning and emotive engagement. Computers & Education, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103836
  12. Cho, Y.H., Caleon, I.S., & Kapur, M. (2015). Authentic Learning Research and Practice: Issues, Challenges, and Future Directions. In: Y. Cho, I. Caleon, M. Kapur (eds.) Authentic Problem Solving and Learning in the 21st Century. Education Innovation Series. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-521-1_20
  13. Coelho, H. (2018). The robot take-over: Reflections on the meaning of automated education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26(115). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.26.3863 This article is part of the special issue, Edtech e Políticas de Formação Humana, edited by Lílian do Valle, Daniel Mill and Aldo Victorio Filho.
  14. Cominelli, L., Feri, F., Garofalo, R. et al. (2021). Promises and trust in humanrobot interaction. Scientific Reports 11, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88622-9
  15. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper and Row.
  16. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding Flow: The Psychology of Engagement With Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
  17. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, S.S. (1988). Optimal experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521438094
  18. Czapiński, J. (2003). Całe szczęście. Charaktery [Fortunately. Characters], 3(73):8–15.
  19. Czapiński, J. (2004). Czy szczęście popłaca? Dobrostan psychiczny jako przyczyna pomyślności życiowej. [Does Happiness Pay off? Mental Well-Being as a Cause of Life Success.] In J. Czapiński J. (ed.). Psychologia pozytywna. Nauka o szczęściu, zdrowiu, sile i cnotach człowieka, [Positive psychology. Learning about happiness, health, strength and human virtues] (pp. 235–254). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. ISBN 83-01-14275-8
  20. Czepczor-Bernat K., Modrzejewska J., Porczyńska-Ciszewska A., Modrzejewska A., Bieńkowska I., Matusik P. (2023). Dyadic Predictors of Willing to Engage in Physical Activity and Emotional Eating in Children and Adolescents with Mild and Moderate Intellectual Disability. Nutrients, 15(10), s. 1–14. ISSN: 2072–6643, https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15102343
  21. Danner, D. D., Snowden, D. A., & Friesen W. (2001). Positive emotions in early life and longevity: Findings from the Nun Study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80:804-813. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.5.804
  22. Diener E., & Biswas-Diener R., (2008). Unlocking the Mysteries of Msychological Wealth. Blackwell Publishing Limited.
  23. Diener, E., & Lucas, R. (2005). Dobrostan emocjonalny [Emotional well-being]. In M. Lewis, J. Haviland-Jones (Ed.). Psychologia emocji. [Psychology of emotions.] Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne. ISBN 83-8957462-4
  24. Diener, E., Horwitz, J., & Emmons, R. (1985). Happiness of the Very Wealthy. Social Indicators Research, 16, 263–274.
  25. Fabián, R., Jiménez, L., Ilber, A. Ruge, R., Andrés, F., & Jiménez, L. (2020). Modeling and Control of a Two Wheeled Auto-Balancing Robot: a didactic platform for control engineering education In Conference Proceedings 18th LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education, and Technology: “Engineering, Integration, and Alliances for a Sustainable Development” “Hemispheric Cooperation for Competitiveness and Prosperity on a Know ledge-Based Economy”, July 27–31, 2020, Virtual Edition. https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2020.1.1.556
  26. Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. Teachers College Press.
  27. Grohman, M. G., & Szmidt, K. J. (2013). Teaching for creativity: How to shape creative attitudes in teachers and in students. In M. Banks Gregerson, H. T. Snyder, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Teaching creatively and teaching creativity (p. 15–35). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5185-3_2
  28. Guilford, J. P., McGuire, J. S. G., & Zimmerman, W. S. (1978). The Guilford-Zimmerman Temperament Survey: Manual: Directions for Administering, Scoring, and Interpreting. [Place of publication not identified]: Sheridan Psychological Services.
  29. Heer, C. (2020). IFR presents World Robotics Report 2020 Retrieved from: https://ifr.org/ifr-press-releases/news/record-2.7-million-robots-work-in-factories-around-the-globe
  30. Henry Henry, J. (2004). Positive and Creative Organization. In P. A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 269–285). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  31. Hoggard, L. (2005). How to Be Happy. BBC Worldwide Limited.
  32. Horikoshi, R. (2020). Teaching chemistry with LEGO® bricks. Chemistry Teacher International. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2020-0017
  33. Hug, T. (2019). Robots as Friends, Co-Workers, Teachers and Learning Machines – Metaphorical Analyses and Ethical Considerations In E. Smyrnova-Trybulska (ed.) E-learning and STEM Education. E-learning Series. Vol. 11 (2019) Katowice–Cieszyn: Studio Noa for University of Silesia. (pp. 17–33) https://doi.org/10.34916/el.2019.11.02
  34. Ishida, R. (2012). Reducing anxiety in stutterers through the association between “purpose in life/Ikigai” and emotions. Global journal of health science, 4(5), 120. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v4n5p120
  35. Jędrzejewski, G. (2019). Miniaturowy układ zasilania bezprzewodowego Qi na przykładzie robota edukacyjnego “Edek”. Elektronika: konstrukcje, technologie, zastosowania, [Miniature Qi wireless power supply system based on the “Edek” educational robot. Electronics: structures, technologies, applications] 60(6).
  36. Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2011). Classroom-based Experiments in Productive Failure. In L. Carlson, C. Hülscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2812–2817). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  37. Kaur, B., Yeap, B. H., & Kapur, M. (eds.) (2009). Mathematical Problem Solving. Yearbook 2009, Singapore: Association of Mathematics Educators.
  38. Keller, L., & John, I. (2020). Motivating female students for computer science by means of robot workshops. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 10(1), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v10i1.11661
  39. Khanlari, A. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions of the benefits and the challenges of integrating educational robots into primary/elementary curricula. European Journal of Engineering Education. 41(3):320–330 https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2015.1056106
  40. Konijn, E. A., & Hoorn, J. F. (2020). Robot tutor and pupils’ educational ability: Teaching the times tables, Computers & Education, 157, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103970
  41. LEGO® Education WeDo 2.0 Curriculum Pack (2017), available from within the software LEGO® Education WeDo 2.0, Retrieved from: https://education.lego.com/en-us/downloads/wedo-2
  42. LEGO® Education. Retrieved from: https://education.lego.com/pl-pl/
  43. LEGO® MINDSTORMS® Education EV3 Coding Activities (2017), Retrieved from: https://le-www-live-s.legocdn.com/downloads/LME-EV3/LME-EV3Coding-activities 1.0 en-US.zip
  44. LEGO® MINDSTORMS® Education EV3 Downloads (2017). Retrieved from: https://education.lego.com/en-us/downloads/mindstorms-ev3
  45. Lehto, P., Ainamo, A., & Porokuokka, J. (2018). The Role of Master’s Level Students – Case Robots And Future of Welfare Services In L.G. Chova; A.L. Martinez, I.C. Torres, Proceedings of Annual 11th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (ICERI2018): Book Series: ICERI Proceedings, (pp. 6986–6992), Seville, SPAIN, November 12–14, 2018.
  46. Leroy, A., Romero, M., & Cassone, L. (2021). Interactivity and materiality matter in creativity: educational robotics for the assessment of divergent thinking. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–12.
  47. Luccio, F.L. (2019). Learning Distributed Algorithms by Programming Robots. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 15(2), 89–100, Special Issue: SI, https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1625
  48. Marks, G., & Fleming, N. (1999). Influences and consequences of well-being among Australian young people: 1980–1995. Social Indicators Research, 46:301–323, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006928507272
  49. Martin, F.G., Butler, D. & Gleason, W.M. (2000). Design, story-telling, and robots in Irish primary education. Conference Proceedings: 2000 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man & Cybernetics Conference, 8–11 October, Nashville, Tennessee, 1, (pp. 730–735). http://www.smc2000.org/. Print ISSN: 1062-922X https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2000.885082
  50. Martins, J., Hillairet, J., André-Mitsialis, S., Aspilcueta, R., Alfonsi, M., Barbuti, A., … & Vives, S. (2020). ITER robots: Introducing school students to robotics and pro ject management. Physics Education, 55(2) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ab5ce1
  51. McKay, E., Asquith, K., Smyrnova-Trubulska, E., Porczyńska-Ciszewska, A., Kopczyński, T. (2022) Data Evaluation of Happiness Scale Online Study: A Rasch Measurement Analysis. In: E. McKay (Ed.). Manage Your Own Learning Analytics, Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies 261, Print ISBN 978-3-030-86315-9, Online ISBN 978-3-030-86316-6 (pp. 73–112) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86316-6_4
  52. Mental health of students during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic as compared to the time before the pandemic in Poland in 2020 [Graph]. In Statista. Retrieved November 10, 2022, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/1221045/poland-mental-health-of-students-during-covid-19/)
  53. Morze, N., Smyrnova-Trybulska, E., Zuziak, W., Kommers, P., & Gladun, M. (2017). Robotics in primary school in the opinion of prospective and inservice teachers. A comparative study. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning, 27(4):318–338, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCEELL.2017.087140
  54. Morze, N., Strutynska, O., & Umryk, M. (2018). Implementation of Robotics as a Modern Trend in STEM Education. International Journal of Research in E-Learning, 4(2):11–32 https://doi.org/10.31261/IJREL.2018.4.2.02
  55. Mourlam, D. J., DeCino, D. A., Newland, L. A., & Strouse, G. A. (2020). “It’s fun!” using students’ voices to understand the impact of school digital technology integration on their well-being. Computers & Education, 159, 104003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104003
  56. Orben, A., & Przybylski, A. K. (2019). The association between adolescent wellbeing and digital technology use. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0506-1
  57. Oujezdský, A., & Nagyová, I. (2016). Developing Technical Skills of Pupils in Primary and Secondary Schools. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology in Education, 5(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijicte-2016-0001
  58. Pande, M., & Bharathi, S. V. (2020). Theoretical foundations of design thinking – A constructivism learning approach to design thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100637.
  59. Papadopoulosa, I., Lazzarinoa, R., Miah, S., Weaver, T., Thomas, B., & Koulougliotia, C. (2020). A systematic review of the literature regarding socially assistive robots in pre-tertiary education Computers & Education, 155, October 2020, 103924 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103924
  60. Papert, S. (1980) MINDSTORMS Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books, Inc., Publishers / New York http://worrydream.com/refs/Papert%20-%20Mindstorms%201st%20ed.pdf
  61. Patterson I.I., & Pegg S.S. (2009). Serious leisure and people with intellectual disabilities: Benefits and opportunities. Leisure Studies, 28(4):387–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614360903071688
  62. Polak, P., & Krzanowski, R. (2020) Phronetic Ethics In Social Robotics:A New Approach To Building Ethical Robots. Studies In Logic, Grammarand Rhetoric 63 (76) 2020 https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2020-0033
  63. Porczyńska A. (2006): Tendencja do podejmowania ryzyka a doświadczanie szczęścia. W: Goszczyńska M., Studenski R. (red.), Psychologia zachowań ryzykownych, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademickie ŻAK. [The tendency to take risks and the experience of happiness. In: Goszczyńska M., Studenski R. (eds.), Psychology of risky behavior, Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Akademickie ŻAK.] ISBN: 8389501627
  64. Porczyńska-Ciszewska A., (2013): Cechy osobowości a doświadczanie szczęścia i poczucie sensu życia. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego [The Role of Personality Traits in Experiencing Happiness and the Meaning of Life. Katowice: University of Silesia Press] ISBN 978-83-226-2156-1
  65. Porczyńska-Ciszewska, A. (2019). The use of e-learning in education for people with mild intellectual disability in the context of their mental well-being. In E. Smyrnova-Trybulska (ed.) E-Learning and STEM Education, “E-learning Series”, 11, (pp. 691–704). Katowice–Cieszyn: Studio Noa for University of Silesia. https://doi.org/10.34916/el.2019.11.43
  66. Pressman, S. D., & Cohen S. (2005). Does positive affect influence health? Psychological Bulletin, 131:925–971. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.925
  67. Robotyka w szkole podstawowej – jaki ma wpływ na rozwój dziecka? [Robotics in primary school – how does it affect a child’s development?] Retrieved from: https://go4robot.pl/polska/robotyka-w-szkole-podstawowej-jaki-ma-wplyw-na-rozwoj-dziecka/
  68. Rodrigues, M. R., & Felicio, P. (2019). The use of ground robots in primary education: Students’ perspectives. Paper presented at the 2019 International Symposium on Computers in Education, SIIE 2019, https://doi.org/10.1109/SIIE48397.2019.8970141
  69. Rosanda, V., & Istenič Starčič, A., (2019). A review of social robots in classrooms: Emerging educational technology and teacher education. Education and Self Development. 14(3):93–106, https://doi.org/10.26907/esd14.3.09
  70. Sangsawang, T., (2017). Constructivism perspective on multimedia games for hearing impaired children. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(7):100–108.
  71. Sapounidis, T., & Alimisis, D. (2020). Educational Robotics for STEM: A Review of Technologies and Some Educational Considerations. Science and Mathematics Education for 21st Century Citizens: Chal lenges and Ways Forward; Nova Science Publishers: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 167–190.
  72. Scaradozzi, D., Cesaretti, L., Screpanti, L., & Mangina, E. (2020). Identification of the Students Learning Process During Education Robotics Activities Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 7(21) https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.00021
  73. Seligman, M. (2011). Pełnia życia. Nowe spo jrzenie na kwestię szczęścia i dobrego życia. [Fullness of life. A new perspective on happiness and a good life.] Poznań: Media Rodzina. ISBN 978-83-7278-586-2
  74. Senge, P. M. (2006). Piąta dyscyplina. Teoria i praktyka organizacji uczących się. [The fifth discipline. The theory and practice of learning organizations.] Warszawa: Oficyna a Wolters Kluwer business. ISBN 83-7484-045-5
  75. Siouli, S., Dratsiou, I., Antoniou, P.E. B̃amidis, PD. (2019). Learning with Educational Robotics through Co-Creative Methodologies. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal. 42:29–46.
  76. Smyrnova-Trybulska E., Staniek D., & Zegzuła D. (2020). Robotics in Education. A Survey Report: A Case Study. International Journal of Research in ELearning, 6(1), 1–18, https://doi.org/10.31261/IJREL.2020.6.1.08
  77. Smyrnova-Trybulska, E., Morze, N., Kommers, P., Zuziak W., & Gladun, M. (2017). Selected aspects and conditions of the use of robots in STEM education for young learners as viewed by teachers and students. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 14(4):296–312, https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-04-2017-0024
  78. Smyrnova-Trybulska, E., Morze, N., Zuziak, W., Gladun, M. (2016). Robots in Elementary School: Some Educational, Legal and Technical Aspects. In E.Smyrnova-Trybulska (ed.), E-learning Methodology – Implementation and Evaluation, Katowice–Cieszyn: Studio-Noa for University of Silesia, 2016, (pp. 321–341). ISBN 978-83-60071-86-1,
  79. Souza, I. M. L., Andrade, W. L., Sampaio, L. M. R., & Araujoy, A. L. S.O. (2018). A Systematic Review on the use of LEGO® Robotics in Education (pp. 1–9). In Conference Proceedings: 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8658751
  80. Spatola, N., Marchesi, S. & Wykowska, A. (2022). Cognitive load affects early processes involved in mentalizing robot behaviour. Scientific Reports 12, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19213-5
  81. Stiffelman, S. (2017). Uważne rodzicielstwo. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Galaktyka. [Mindful parenting. Łódź: Galaktyka Publishing House]
  82. Strutynska, O., & Umryk, M. (2019). Learning Startups as a Pro ject Based Approach in STEAM Education In E. Smyrnova-Trybulska (Ed.) E-learning and STEM Education. E-learning Series. Vol. 11. Katowice–Cieszyn: Studio Noa for University of Silesia. (pp. 529–555) https://doi.org/10.34916/el.2019.11.34
  83. Tattersall, G., Zhu, D., Smith, W.A.P., Huber, P., Deterding, C.S., (Accepted: 2020). Reconstructing Creative Lego Models. In: Computer Vision – ACCV 2020. (In Press) Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344518638_Reconstructing_Creative_Lego_Models
  84. The Council for the Informatization of Education at the Ministry of National Education (Poland), Proposal for changes in the existing IT core curriculum, 2015, Retrieved from: https://men.gov.pl/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/projekt-nowej-podstawy-programowej-ksztalcenia-informatycznego-1.pdf, p. 1.
  85. Van den Berk-Smeekens, I., van Dongen-Boomsma, M., De Korte, M.W.P., Den Boer, J.C., Oosterling, I.J., Peters-Scheffer, N.C., Buitelaar, J.K., Barakova, E.I., Lourens, T., Staal, W.G., Glennon, J.C. (2020) Adherence and acceptability of a robot-assisted Pivotal Response Treatment protocol for children with autism spectrum disorder. Scientific Reports, 2020 May 15; 10(1):8110. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65048-3. PMID: 32415231; PMCID: PMC7229010.
  86. Vandevelde, C., Wyffels, F., Ciocci, M. C., Vanderborght, B., & Saldien, J. (2016). Design and evaluation of a DIY construction system for educational robot kits. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(4), 521–540, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9324-1
  87. Yang, D., Oh, E.-S., & Wang, Y. (2020). Hybrid physical education teaching and curriculum design based on a voice interactive artificial intelligence educational robot. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(19):1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198000
  88. Yi Maggie, Guo, & Young, K. R. (2008). Capturing Flow in the Business Classroom. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6(2):437–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2008.00185.x
  89. Yolcu, V., & Demirer, V. (2017). A review on the studies about the use of robotic technologies in education. SDU International Journal of Educational Studies, 4(2):127–139. ISSN: 2148-9068
  90. Zuziak, W. (2013). Designing and programming robots in contemporary didactics in Polish Schools. In E. Smyrnova-Trybulska (Ed.), E-learning & Lifelong Learning, 5, (pp. 497–509). Katowice–Cieszyn: Studio Noa for University of Silesia. ISBN 978-83-60071-66-3.
  91. Zuziak, W., & Smyrnova-Trybulska, E. (2017). Podejście inżynierskie w nauczaniu, Zeszyty Naukowe Wydziału Elektrotechniki i Automatyki Politechniki Gdańskiej Gdańsk: Politechnika Gdańska [Engineering approach in teaching, Scientific Journals of the Faculty of Electrical and Control Engineering at the Gdańsk University of Technology Gdańsk: Gdańsk University of Technology], 125–130. ISSN 1425–5766, e-ISSN 2353-1290. Retrieved from: http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/baztech/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-af69f791-8bda-4a50-9490-4c662fa6126c
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2024-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Language: English
Page range: 515 - 552
Published on: Dec 31, 2024
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2024 Eugenia Smyrnova-Trybulska, Anna Porczyńska-Ciszewska, Tomasz Kopczyński, Piet Kommers, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.