Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Ordoliberalism – A Research Approach for Today? Cover
Open Access
|Dec 2023

References

  1. Biebricher, T. (2018). The Political Theory of Neoliberalism. Stanford, Stanford University Press.
  2. Blyth, M. (2013). Austerity. The history of a dangerous idea. New York: Oxford University Press.
  3. Clausen, S., & Zöttl, I. (2009). America forever. Financial Times Deutschland, 30.01.2009.
  4. Collier, P. (2018). The Future of Capitalism. Facing the New Anxieties. Allen Lane, Penguin Books. London.
  5. Davidescu, A. A. (2017). Measuring the social market economy. A composite index approach for EU countries. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 227–240. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/picbe-2017-0024.
  6. Enninga, J. (2023). Environmentalism, a flirt with eco-authoritarianism and the robustness of ordoliberalism. Constitutional Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-023-09406-z
  7. Eucken, W. (2004). Grundsätze der Wirtschaftspolitik. Aufl. 7., Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
  8. Eucken, W. (2005). Nationalökonomie wozu?. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
  9. Feld, L. P., Köhler, E. A., & Nientiedt, D. (2021). The German anti-Keynes? On Walter Eucken’s macroeconomics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Volume 43, Number 4, 548–563. https://doi:10.31219/osf.io/bs3w5.
  10. Fèvre, R. (2021). A political economy of power: Ordoliberalism in context, 1932–1950. New York: Oxford University Press.
  11. Helfer, H. (2015). Social market economy: Towards a comprehensive composite index. Discussion Paper, Center for Interdisciplinary Economics, No. 6.
  12. Hien, J. (2023). The rise and fall of ordoliberalism. Socio-Economic Review, Vol. 00, No. 0, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwad018
  13. Hien, J. & Joerges, C. (Eds.). (2017). Ordoliberalism, law and the rule of economics. Bloomsbury Publishing. DOI: 10.5040/9781509919079.
  14. Kłos, L. (2014). Ślad ekologiczny jako nieekonomiczny miernik jakości życia społeczeństwa. Studia Ekonomiczne, (166), 67–77.
  15. Kolev, S. (2015). Ordoliberalism and the Austrian School. In P. J. Boettke & Ch. J. Coyne (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Austrian Economics (pp. 419–444). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199811762.013.18
  16. Kolev, S., Goldschmidt, N. & Zweynert, J. (2019). Neue Ordnungsökonomik. Zur Aktualität eines kontextualen Forschungsprogramms: Replik zum Kommentar von Björn Frank. List Forum für Wirtschafts- und Finanzpolitik, (44), 667–671. doi: 10.1007/s41025-019-00155-2
  17. Moszyński, M. (2016). Niemiecki model Społecznej Gospodarki Rynkowej – perspektywa rynku pracy. Toruń: WN UMK.
  18. Nedergaard, P. & Snaith, H. (2015). “As I Drifted on a River I Could Not Control”: The Unintended Ordoliberal Consequences of the Eurozone Crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(5), 1094–1109. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12249.
  19. North, D. C., Wallis, J. J. & Weingast, B. (2009). Violence and Social Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  20. OECD. (2017). Understanding the socio-economic divide in Europe. Retrieved 20.03.2023, form http://oe.cd/cope-divide-europe-2017
  21. OECD. (2022). Income Distribution Database. Retrieved 20.03.2023, from https://www.oecd.org/social/income-distribution-database.htm
  22. The Economist. (2015). Of rules and order. German ordoliberalism has had a big influence on policy during the euro crisis, 9 May.
  23. Biebricher, T., Nedergaard, P. & Bonefeld, W. (Eds.). (2022). The Oxford Handbook of Ordoliberalism. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford University Press. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198861201.001.0001.
  24. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2022). World Population Prospects 2022: Summary of Results. UN DESA/POP/2022/TR/NO. 3. Retrieved 20.03.2023, from https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/content/World-Population-Prospects-2022
  25. Van Suntum, U., Böhm, T., Oelgemöller, J. & Ilgmann, C. (2012). Defining a modern version of the Social Market Economy. In: Bertelsmann Stiftung (Ed.). Index of Modern Social Market Economy. Explorative Study, Gütersloh: Bertelsmann, 9–30.
  26. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.
  27. Williamson, O. E. (2000). The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595–613.
  28. Weizsäcker, E. U., Wijkman, A. (2018). Ejże! Kapitalizm, krótkowzroczność, populacja i zniszczenie planety. Raport Klubu Rzymskiego, IBS, Politechnika Warszawska, Warszawa.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2023-0018 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Language: English
Page range: 347 - 361
Published on: Dec 31, 2023
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2023 Anna Jurczuk, Michał Moszyński, Piotr Pysz, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.