Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Menger’s Anti-Historical Method Versus the Neoclassical Anti-Historical Method Cover

Menger’s Anti-Historical Method Versus the Neoclassical Anti-Historical Method

By: Mateusz Machaj  
Open Access
|Jul 2019

References

  1. Bagus, Philip. 2011. “Morgenstern’s Forgotten Contribution: A Stab to the Heart of Modern Economics” The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 70, No. 2.10.1111/j.1536-7150.2011.00783.x
  2. Boland, Lawrence A. 1979. “A Critique of Friedman’s Critics” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 17, No. 2.
  3. Boland, Lawrence A. 1994, Scientific Thinking Without Scientific Method: Two Views of Popper, in New Directions in Economic Methodology, ed. by R. A. Backhouse, New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203204085.ch8
  4. Bostaph, Samuel. 2003. “Wieser on Economic Calculation under Socialism” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 6:2.10.1007/s12113-003-1017-z
  5. Bylund, Per L.; G.P Manish. 2017. “Private Property and Economic Calculation: A Reply to Andy Denis” Review of Political Economy, Vol. 29, No. 3.10.1080/09538259.2017.1352193
  6. Clark, Gregory. 2007. A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World. Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400827817
  7. Denis, Andy. 2015. “Economic Calculation: Private Property or Several Control” Review of Political Economy 27(4).10.1080/09538259.2015.1083189
  8. Friedman, Milton. 1953. “Methodology of Positive Economics” in: Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  9. Georgescu-Rogen, N. 1988. “Closing Remarks: About Economic Growth: A Variation on a Theme by David Hilbert”, Economic Development and Cultural Change 36:3 supplement.10.1086/edcc.36.s3.1566547
  10. Harding, Sandra G. 1976. Can Theories be Refuted?: Essays on the Duhem-Quine Thesis. Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company.10.1007/978-94-010-1863-0
  11. Hoppe, Hans Hermann. 2007. “The Limits of Numerical Probability: Frank H. Knight and Ludwig von Mises and the Frequency Interpretation” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, Vol. 10, No. 1.10.1007/s12113-007-9005-3
  12. Huerta de Soto, Jesús. 1998. “The Ongoing Methodenstreit of The Austrian School” Journal desÉconomistes et desÉtudes Humaines, 1998, vol. 8, issue 1.10.1515/jeeh-1998-0105
  13. Jaffé, William. 1976. “Menger, Jevons, and Walras De-homogenized”, Economic Inquiry 14, December.10.1111/j.1465-7295.1976.tb00439.x
  14. Knight, Frank. 1940. “‘What is Truth’ in Economics?”. Journal of Political Economy 48:1.10.1086/255500
  15. Lakatos, Imre. 1978.The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621123
  16. Lange, O. 1936. “On the Economic Theory of Socialism: Part One”, Review of Economic Studies 4:1.10.2307/2967660
  17. Mäki U. 2009. The Methodology of Positive Economics Reflections on the Milton Friedman legacy. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511581427
  18. Menger, Carl. 1985. Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences. New York University Press.
  19. Mises, L. 1966. Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. Chicago, IL: Contemporary Books.
  20. Mises, Ludwig. 1990. Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth. Auburn, Al: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
  21. Morgenstern, Oskar. 1963. On the Accuracy of Economic Observations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  22. Popper, Karl. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.10.1063/1.3060577
  23. Popper, Karl. 1994. The Myth of the Framework. In defense of science and rationality (edited by M. A. Notturno). London: Routledge.
  24. Schumpeter, Joseph. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
  25. Sen, Amartya. 1985. The Standard of Living. Cambridge University Press.
  26. Shankland, R. S. 1964. “Michelson-Morley Experiment” American Journal of Physics 32, 16.10.1119/1.1970063
  27. Smith, Barry. 1994. Austrian Philosophy. The Legacy of Franz Brentano, Chicago: Open Court.
  28. Smith, Barry. 1996. “In Defense of (Fallibistic) Apriorism”. Journal of Libertarian Studies 12.
  29. Streissler, Erich. 1973. “To What Extent Was the Austrian School Marginalist?” in R. Collinson Black et al (eds.), The Marginal Revolution in Economics: Interpretation and Evaluation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  30. Wade Hands, D. 2009. Did Milton Friedman’s Positive Methodology License the Formalist Revolution?, (w:) M¨aki U. 2009. The Methodology of Positive Economics Reflections on the Milton Friedman legacy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511581427.007
  31. Wieser, Friedrich. 1971. Natural Value. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2019-0004 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Language: English
Page range: 65 - 74
Published on: Jul 20, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2019 Mateusz Machaj, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.