Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Logical Culture as a Common Ground for the Lvov-Warsaw School and the Informal Logic Initiative Cover

Logical Culture as a Common Ground for the Lvov-Warsaw School and the Informal Logic Initiative

Open Access
|Dec 2018

References

  1. Adler, J.E. (1994). Fallacies and Alternative Interpretations. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72(3), 271-282. DOI: 10.1080/0004840941234609110.1080/00048409412346091
  2. Ajdukiewicz, K. (1957). Zarys logiki (The Outline of Logic). Warsaw: PZWS - Państwowe Zakłady Wydawnictw Szkolnych.
  3. Ajdukiewicz, K. (1965). Co może szkoła zrobić dla podniesienia kultury logicznej uczniow (What school can do to improve the logical culture of students). In K. Ajdukiewicz, Język i poznanie, vol. II (Language and Cognition, vol. II) (pp. 322-331), Warsaw: PWN - Polish Scientific Publishers.
  4. Ajdukiewicz, K. (1974). Pragmatic Logic. (O.Wojtasiewicz, Trans.). Dordrecht/Boston/ Warsaw: D. Reidel Publishing Company & PWN - Polish Scientific Publishers. (Original work published in 1965).10.1007/978-94-010-2109-8
  5. Bar Hillel, Y. (1969). Formal Logic and Natural Languages. Foundations of Language 5.
  6. Barth, E. M. and E.C.W. Krabbe (1982). From Axiom to Dialogue: A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110839807
  7. Blair, J.A. (1992). Premissary Relevance. Argumentation 6 (2), 203-217.10.1007/BF00154326
  8. Blair, J.A. (2003). ‘Relationships Among Logic, Dialectic and Rhetoric’. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard and A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Anyone Who Has a View: Studies in Argumentation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 91-107.10.1007/978-94-007-1078-8_8
  9. Blair, J.A. (2004). Argument and its uses. Informal Logic 24(2), 137-151.10.22329/il.v24i2.2140
  10. Blair, J. A. (2007a). ‘Relevance, Acceptability and Sufficiency Today,’ Anthropology & Philosophy 8 (1-2), 33-47.
  11. Blair, J. A. (2007b). ‘The ‘Logic’ of Informal Logic’. In H. V. Hansen, C. W. Tindale, J. A. Blair, R. H. Johnson, D. M. Godden (Eds.), Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground. Proceedings of the Seventh OSSA Conference, University of Windsor, CD-ROM.
  12. Bocheński, J.M. (1974). Was ist Autorit¨at? Freiburg: Herder.
  13. Bocheński, J.M. (1994). Sto zabobonow (One Hundred Dogmas). Krakow: Philed.
  14. Bowles, G. (1990). Propositional Relevance. Informal Logic 12(2), 65-77.10.22329/il.v12i2.2602
  15. Brandom, R. (1994). Making It Explicit. Harvard: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Budzynska, K. (2010). Argument Analysis: Components of Interpersonal Argumentation. In P. Baroni et al. (Eds.), Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Computational
  17. Models of Argument (COMMA 2010) (pp. 135-146). Amsterdam etc.: IOS Press.
  18. Budzynska, K., Araszkiewicz, M., Bogołębska, B., Cap, P., Ciecierski, T., Debowska- Kozlowska, K., Dunin-Kęplicz, B., Dziubiński, M., Federowicz, M., Gomolińska, A., Grabowski, A., Hołowka, T., Jochemczyk, Ł., Kacprzak, M., Kawalec, P., Kielar, M., Kisielewicz, A., Koszowy, M., Kublikowski, R., Kulicki, P., Kuzio, A., Lewiński, P., Lichański, J. Z., Malinowski, J., Marciszewski, W., Nieznański, E., Pietrzak, J., Pogonowski, J., Puczyłowski, T. A., Rytel, J., Sawicka, A., Selinger, M., Skowron, A., Skulska, J., Smolak, M., Sokoł, M., Sowińska, A., Stalmaszczyk, P., Stawecki, T., Stepaniuk, J., Strachocka, A., Suchoń,W., Szymanek, K., Tomczyk, J., Trypuz, R., Trzęsicki, K., Urbański, M., Wasilewska-Kamińska, E., Wieczorek, K. A., Witek, M., Wybraniec-Skardowska, U., Yaskorska, O., Załęska, M., Zdanowski, K. and Żurek, T. (2014). The Polish School of Argumentation: A Manifesto. Argumentation 28(3), 267-282. DOI 10.1007/s10503-014-9320-8 (Special Issue “The Polish School of Argumentation”, ed. by K. Budzynska and M. Koszowy).10.1007/s10503-014-9320-8(ed..Budzynska.Koszowy)
  19. Coniglione, F., R. Poli, and J. Woleński (1993, Eds.). Polish Scientific Philosophy. The Lvov-Warsaw School. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004457270
  20. Copi, I.M. (1954). An Introduction to Logic. New York: MacMillan.
  21. Copi, I.M. (1965). Symbolic Logic. New York: Macmillan, 2nd ed.
  22. Czeżowski, T. (2000). On logical culture. In T. Czeżowski, Knowledge, Science, and Values. A Program for Scientific Philosophy (pp. 68-75). Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004457683_008
  23. Eemeren, F. H. van, and R. Grootendorst (1992). Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  24. Eemeren, F. H. van, B. Garssen, E. C.W. Krabbe, A.F. Snoeck Henkemans, B. Verheij, and J. H. M. Wagemans (2014). Handbook of Argumentation Theory. A Comprehensive Overview of the State of the Art. Dordrecht etc.: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-9473-5
  25. Engel, M.S. (1976).With Good Reason. An Introduction to Informal Fallacies. New York: St Martin’s.
  26. Ennis, R. H. (1987). A Taxonomy of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities. In J. Baron and R. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice (pp. 9-26), New York: W. H. Freeman.
  27. Federowicz, M. and M. Sitek (2011, Eds.). A Society on the Road to Knowledge. Report on the State of Education 2010. Warsaw: Educational Research Institute.
  28. Freeman, J.B. (2005). Acceptable Premises: An Epistemic Approach to an Informal Logic Problem. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511610301
  29. Goddu, G.C. (2009). What is a ‘Real’ Argument? Informal Logic 29, 1-14.10.22329/il.v29i1.682
  30. Groarke, L. (1996). Logic, Art and Argument. Informal Logic 18(2-3), 105-129.10.22329/il.v18i2.2376
  31. Groarke, L. (2017). Informal logic. In E.N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-informal/.
  32. Griffin, N. (2013). Commentary on: Marcin Koszowy’s ‘Polish logical studies in an informal logic perspective”. In D. Mohammed & M. Lewiński (Eds.), Virtues of Argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22-26 May 2013 (pp. 1-5). Windsor, ON: OSSA.
  33. Hamby, B. (2012). What a Real Argument Is. Informal Logic 32, 313-326.10.22329/il.v32i3.3531
  34. Hintikka, J. (1989). The Role of Logic in Argument. The Monist 72, 3-24.10.5840/monist19897211
  35. Hitchcock, D. (1996). Johnson’s The Rise of Informal Logic [critical review]. Informal Logic 18, 273-287.10.22329/il.v18i2.2385
  36. Hitchcock, D. (2006). Informal Logic and The Concept of Argument. In D. Jacquette (Ed.), Philosophy of Logic, Volume 5 of D. M. Gabbay, P. Thagard and J. Woods (Eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Science North Holland: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-044451541-4/50007-5
  37. Hołowka, T. (2005). Kultura logiczna w przykładach (Logical culture in examples). Warsaw: PWN - Polish Scientific Publishers.
  38. Jadacki, J.J. (2009). Polish Analytical Philosophy. Studies on Its Heritage. Warsaw: Semper.
  39. Johnson, R.H. (1996). The Rise of Informal Logic. Essays on Argumentation, Critical Thinking, Reasoning and Politics. Newport News, VA: Vale Press.
  40. Johnson, R.H. (2000). Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.10.1023/A:1007837310258
  41. Johnson, R.H. (2006). Making Sense of ‘Informal Logic’. Informal Logic 23, 231-258.10.22329/il.v26i3.453
  42. Johnson, R.H. (2008). Informal Logic and Epistemology. Anthropology and Philosophy 8(1-2), 69-88.
  43. Johnson, R.H. (2009). Some Reflections on the Informal Logic Initiative. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 16(29), 17-46.
  44. Johnson, R. H. and J.A. Blair (1977). Logical Self-Defense (3rd edition, 1993). Toronto:McGraw-Hill Ryerson. First United States edition: 1994, New York: McGraw-Hill. New United States edition: 2006, New York: IDEA Press.
  45. Johnson, R. H. and J.A. Blair (1987). The Current State of Informal Logic. Informal Logic 9 (2-3), 147-151.10.22329/il.v9i2.2671
  46. Kahane, H. (1971). Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric (8th edition, 1997), with Nancy Cavender. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  47. Kamiński, S. (1962). Systematyzacja typowych błędow logicznych (The systematization of typical logical fallacies). Roczniki Filozoficzne (Annales de Philosophie) 10, 5-39.
  48. Kneale, W., and M. Kneale (1962). The Development of Logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  49. Koszowy, M. (2010). Pragmatic logic and the study of argumentation. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 22(35), 29-45.
  50. Koszowy, M. (2012). Logical fallacies as codified within the conceptual system of the Lvov-Warsaw School. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 30(43), 23-44.
  51. Koszowy, M. (2013). The methodological approach to argument evaluation: rules of defining as applied to assessing arguments. Filozofia Nauki (Philosophy of Science) 1(81), 23-36.
  52. Koszowy M. and M. Araszkiewicz (2014). The Lvov-Warsaw School as a Source of Inspiration for Argumentation Theory. Argumentation 28(3), 283-300. DOI 10.1007/s10503-014-9321-7 (Special Issue “The Polish School of Argumentation”, ed. by K. Budzynska & M. Koszowy).10.1007/s10503-014-9321-7(ed..Budzynska&;M.Koszowy)
  53. Kotarbinski, T. (1965). Praxiology: An Introduction to the Sciences of Efficient Action. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  54. Lapointe, S., Woleński, J., Marion, M., and Miskiewicz, W. (Eds.) (2009). The Golden Age of Polish Philosophy. Kazimierz Twardowski’s Philosophical Legacy. Dordrecht etc.: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-2401-5
  55. Lorenzen, P. (1955). Einf¨uhrung in die operative Logik und Mathematik, Berlin: Springer. Lorenz, K., Lorenzen, P. (1978). Dialogische Logik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.10.1007/978-3-662-01539-1
  56. Łupkowski, P. (2016). Logic of Questions in the Wild. Inferential Erotetic Logic in Information Seeking Dialogue Modelling. Studies in Logic, vol. 64, edited by Dov M. Gabbay. London: College Publications.
  57. Łuszczewska-Romahnowa, S. (1962). Pewne pojęcie poprawnej inferencji i pragmatyczne pojęcie wynikania (A certain notion of valid inference and the pragmatic notion of entailment). Studia Logica 13, 203-208.10.1007/BF02317279
  58. Marciszewski,W. (1991). Foundations of the art of argument. Logic Group Bulletin, 1, Warsaw Scientific Society, 45-49.
  59. Marciszewski,W. (1994). Logic from a Rhetorical Point of View. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110886627
  60. Massey, G. (1981). The Fallacy Behind Fallacies. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 6, 489-500.10.1111/j.1475-4975.1981.tb00454.x
  61. McCall, S. (1967). Polish Logic, 1920-1939. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  62. Michalos, A.C. (1970). Improving Your Reasoning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  63. Munson, R. (1977). The Way of Words: An Informal Logic. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  64. Perelman, Ch. & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1958). Trait´e de l’argumentation: La nouvelle rh´etorique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  65. Reed, C. & Koszowy, M. (2011). The Development of Argument and Computation and Its Roots in the Lvov-Warsaw School. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 23(36), 15-37.
  66. Scriven, M. (1976). Reasoning. New York: McGraw Hill.
  67. Scriven,M. (1980). The Philosophical and Pragmatic Significance of Informal Logic. In J. A. Blair & R. H. Johnson (Eds.), Informal Logic, The First International Symposium (pp. 147-160), Inverness, CA: Edgepress.
  68. Siegel, H. (1988). Educating Reason: Rationality, Critical Thinking, and Education. New York: Routledge.
  69. Simons, P. (1992). Philosophy and Logic in Central Europe from Bolzano to Tarski. Selected Essays. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-015-8094-6
  70. Simons, P. (2002). A Golden Age in Science and Letters: The Lwow-Warsaw Philosophical
  71. School. 1895-1939. An essay for Polish Class at Leeds Metropolitan University, https://sites.google.com/site/petermsimons/peter-s-files.
  72. Simons, P. (2014). The Complexity of Language: Its Sources, Results, and Description. A Lvov-Warsaw School Supplement. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 36(49) (in press).10.2478/slgr-2014-0005
  73. Smith, B. (1994). Kasimir Twardowski: On Content and Object. In B. Smith (1994), Austrian Philosophy: The Legacy of Franz Brentano (pp. 155-195, Ch. 6), Chicago & LaSalle: Open Court.
  74. Smith, B. (2006). Why Polish philosophy does not exist. In J.J. Jadacki & J. Paśniczek (Eds.), The Lvov-Warsaw School - The New Generation (pp. 19-39). Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, vol. 89. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.10.1163/9789401203371_003
  75. Szymanek, K., Wieczorek, K. and Wojcik, A.S. (2005). Sztuka argumentacji. Ćwiczenia w badaniu argumentow (The Art of Argument: Exercises in Examining Arguments). Warsaw: PWN - Polish Scientific Publishers.
  76. Tarski, A. (1995). Introduction to Logic and to the Methodology of Deductive Sciences. New York: Dover Publications.10.1093/oso/9780195044720.001.0001
  77. Thomas, S. N. (1973). Practical Reasoning in Natural Language, (3rd editon, 1986), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  78. Twardowski, K. (1965). Symbolomania i pragmatofobia (Symbolomania and pragmatophobia). In K. Twardowski,Wybrane pisma filozoficzne (Selected Philosophical Writings) (pp. 354-363).Warsaw: PWN - Polish Scientific Publishers.
  79. Urbański M. and Łupkowski P. (2010). Erotetic Search Scenarios: Revealing Interrogator’s Hidden Agenda. In P. Łupkowski & M. Purver (Eds.) Semantics
  80. and Pragmatics of Dialogue (pp. 67-74). Poznań: Polish Society for Cognitive Science.
  81. Walton, D. (1982). Topical Relevance in Argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pb.iii.8
  82. Walton, D. (1984). Logical Dialogue-Games and Fallacies. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America, 1984.
  83. Walton, D. (1990). What is Reasoning? What is an Argument? The Journal of Philosophy 87, 399-419.10.2307/2026735
  84. Walton, D. (1995). Entry on Informal Logic. In R. Audi (Ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  85. Walton, D. (1997). Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments from Authority. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.
  86. Walton, D. (2000). Problems and Useful Techniques: My Experiences in Teaching Courses in Argumentation, Informal Logic and Critical Thinking. Informal Logic, 20(2), Teaching Supplement #2, TS35-TS38.10.22329/il.v20i2.2272
  87. Walton, D. (2008). Informal Logic: A Pragmatic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  88. Walton, D. and F. Macagno (2010). Defeasible classifications and inferences from definitions. Informal Logic 30, 34-61.10.22329/il.v30i1.692
  89. Walton, D. and T.F. Gordon (2015). Formalizing informal logic. Informal Logic 35, 508-538.10.22329/il.v35i4.4335
  90. Weinstein, M. (1990). Towards a research agenda for Informal Logic and Critical Thinking. Informal Logic 12, 121-143.10.22329/il.v12i3.2609
  91. Wenzel, J. (1990). Three Perspectives on Argumentation. In R. Trapp & J. Schuetz (Eds.), Perspectives on Argumentation: Essays in Honour of Wayne Brockreide (pp. 9-26), Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
  92. Wiśniewski, A. (1995). The Posing of Questions: Logical Foundations of Erotetic Inferences. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Synthese Library, vol. 252.10.1007/978-94-015-8406-7
  93. Woleński, J. (1989). Logic and Philosophy in the Lvov-Warsaw School. Dordrecht etc.: D. Reidel Publishing Company.10.1007/978-94-009-2581-6
  94. Woleński, J. (1995). Mathematical logic in Poland 1900-1939: People, circles, institutions, ideas. Modern Logic 5, 363-405.
  95. Woleński, J. (2013). Lvov-Warsaw School. In E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lvov-warsaw/.
  96. Woods, J. (1994). “Sunny prospects for relevance?”. In R.H. Johnson and J. A. Blair (eds.), New Essays in Informal Logic, (pp. 93-104), Windsor, ON: Informal Logic Press.
  97. Woods, J. (2004). The Death of Argument: Fallacies in Agent-Based Reasoning. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer.10.1007/978-1-4020-2712-3
  98. Woods, J. (2006). “Pragma-Dialectics: A Retrospective”. In P. Houtlosser & Agnes van Rees (Eds.), Condsidering Pragma-Dialectics, New York and London: Routledge.
  99. Woods J. and D.M. Gabbay (2002). “Formal approaches to practical reasoning: A survey”. In D.M. Gabbay, R.H. Johnson, H.-J. Ohlbach and J. Woods (Eds), Handbook of the Logic of Argument and Inference: The Turn Toward the Practical, vol. 1 of the series Studies in Logic and Practical Reasoning (pp. 449-481), Amsterdam: North-Holland.10.1016/S1570-2464(02)80013-1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2018-0035 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Language: English
Page range: 187 - 229
Published on: Dec 6, 2018
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2018 Ralph H. Johnson, Marcin Koszowy, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.