Overcoming Disagreement Through Ordering: Building an Epistemic Hierarchy
References
- Christensen, D. (2007). Epistemology of disagreement: the good news. Philosophical Review, 116(2), 187-217.10.1215/00318108-2006-035
- Christensen, D. (2009). Disagreement as Evidence: The Epistemology of Controversy. Philosophy Compass 4/5 (2009): 756-767.10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00237.x
- Christensen, D. & Lackey, J. (Eds.) (2013). The Epistemology of Disagreement: New Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199698370.001.0001
- van Eemeren, F. & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic Theory of Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511616389
- Feldman, R. (2006). Epistemological puzzles about disagreement. In. S Heatherington, ed., Epistemology Futures (pp. 216-236). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Finocchiaro, M. (2011). Deep disagreements: A meta-argumentation approach. In Zenker, F. (ed.). Argumentation: Cognition and Community. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA). http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA9/papersandcommentaries/31.10.1007/978-94-007-4041-9_3
- Fogelin, R. (2005). The logic of deep disagreements. Informal Logic 25(1), 3-11.10.22329/il.v25i1.1040
- Godden, D. (2011). Commentary on “Deep disagreements: A meta-argumentation approach” by Maurice Finocchiaro. In Zenker, F. (ed.). Argumentation: Cognition and Community. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA). http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA9/papersandcommentaries/31
- Godden, D. & Brenner,W. (2010).Wittgenstein and the logic of deep disagreement. Cogency vol. 2, no. 2, 41-80.
- Lugg, A. (1986). Deep disagreement and informal logic: No cause for alarm. Informal Logic 8.1: 47-51.10.22329/il.v8i1.2680
- Jehle, D. & Fitelson, B. (2009). What is the “EqualWeight View”? Episteme 2009, 280-293.10.3366/E1742360009000719
- Kelly, T. (2005). The epistemic significance of disagreement. In T. S. Gendler & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology 1 (pp. 167-196).
- Kelly, T. (2011). Peer Disagreement and Higher Order Evidence. In A. Goldman & D. Whitcomb (Eds.) Social Epistemology: Essential Readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226078.003.0007
- Siegal, H. (2013). Argumentation and the epistemology of disagreement. OSSA Conference Archive. Paper 157. http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA10/papersandcommentaries/157.
- Wagemans, J. (2011). The Assessment of Argumentation from Expert Opinion. Argumentation 25: 329-339.10.1007/s10503-011-9225-8
- Walton, D., Reed, C. & Macagno, F. (2008). Argumentation Schemes. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511802034
Language: English
Page range: 77 - 91
Published on: Dec 6, 2018
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Related subjects:
© 2018 Martin Hinton, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.