Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Analogy, Similarity, and the Periodic Table of Arguments

Open Access
|Dec 2018

References

  1. Bartha, P. (2016). Analogy and analogical reasoning. In E.N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/reasoning-analogy/.
  2. Conspiracies.net (2017). Mars conspiracies: Is there life on Mars? URL = www.conspiracies.net/mars-conspiracy-life/.
  3. Eemeren, F.H. van, Garssen, B.J., Krabbe, E.C.W., Snoeck Henkemans, A.F., Verheij, H.B., &Wagemans, J.H.M. (2014). Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-9473-5
  4. Eemeren, F.H. van, & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511616389
  5. Garssen, B.J. (2009). Comparing the incomparable: Figurative analogies in a dialectical testing procedure. In F.H. van Eemeren & B.J. Garssen (Eds.), Pondering on problems of argumentation: Twenty essays on theoretical issues (pp. 133-140). Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-9165-0_10
  6. Garssen, B.J., & Kienpointner, M. (2001). Figurative analogy in political argumentation. In E.T. Feteris, B.J. Garssen & A.F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics (pp. 39-58). Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/z.163.04gar
  7. Guarini, M., Butchart, A., Smith, P.S., & Moldovan, A. (2009). Resources for research on analogy: A multi-disciplinary guide. Informal Logic, 29(2), 84-197.10.22329/il.v29i2.1225
  8. Hitchcock, D.L., & Wagemans, J.H.M. (2011). The pragma-dialectical account of argument schemes. In E.T. Feteris, B.J. Garssen & A.F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics (pp. 185-205). Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/z.163.13hit
  9. Juthe, L.J.A. (2016a). Argumentation by analogy: A systematic analytical study of an argument scheme. Dissertation University of Amsterdam.
  10. Juthe, L.J.A. (2016b). Classifications of arguments by analogy, Part I: A comprehensive review of proposals for classifying arguments by analogy. Cogency, 8(2), 51-99.
  11. Kennedy, G.A. (1991). Aristotle, On rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse. New York / Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  12. Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Translated by J.Wilkinson & P.Weaver. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
  13. Politiek.tpo.nl (2017). Ook dit jaar vindt de Nederlander dat de Oranjes belasting moeten betalen. URL = http://politiek.tpo.nl/2017/04/25/ook-dit-jaarvindt-de-nederlander-dat-de-oranjes-belasting-moeten-betalen/.
  14. Ribeiro, H.J. (2014). Introduction. In idem (Ed.), Systematic approaches to argument by analogy. Cham / Heidelberg / New York / Dordrecht / London: Springer.
  15. Rubinelli, S. (2009). Ars topica: The classical technique of constructing arguments from Aristotle to Cicero. Dordrecht / Boston: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-9549-8
  16. Wagemans, J.H.M. (2016a). Analyzing metaphor in argumentative discourse. Rivista ltaliana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, 10(2), 79-94.
  17. Wagemans, J.H.M. (2016b). Constructing a Periodic Table of Arguments. In P. Bondy & L. Benacquista (Eds.), Argumentation, Objectivity, and Bias: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 18-21 May 2016 (pp. 1-12). Windsor, ON: OSSA.
  18. Wagemans, J.H.M. (2018). Assertoric syllogistic and the Periodic Table of Arguments. In S. Oswald & D. Maillat (Eds.), Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017 (Volume I, pp. 573-588). London: College Publications.10.2139/ssrn.3060509
  19. Walton, D. (2014). Argumentation schemes for argument from analogy. In H.J. Ribeiro (Ed.), Systematic approaches to argument by analogy. (pp. 23-40). Cham / Heidelberg / New York / Dordrecht / London: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-06334-8_2
  20. Walton, D., Reed, C., & Macagno, F. (2008). Argumentation schemes. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511802034
  21. Wisdom, J.O. (1991). Proof and explanation: The Virginia lectures. Edited by Stephen F. Barker. Lanham: University Press of America.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2018-0028 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Language: English
Page range: 63 - 75
Published on: Dec 6, 2018
Published by: University of Białystok, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Related subjects:

© 2018 Jean H. M. Wagemans, published by University of Białystok, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.