Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
In Quest of Sufficient Equivalence. Polish and English Insolvency Terminology in Translation. a Comparative Study Cover

In Quest of Sufficient Equivalence. Polish and English Insolvency Terminology in Translation. a Comparative Study

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
Volume 38 (2014): Issue 1 (September 2014)
By:   
Open Access
|Nov 2014
References

References

  1. Alcaraz Varo, E. & Hughes, B. (2002). Legal Translation Explained. Manchester. S. Jerome Publishing.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Bańczerowski, J. & Matulewska, A. (2012). Towards the Foundations of Legilin- guistic Translatology. In P. Grzegorczyk, K. Knoppek & M. Walasik (Eds.), Proces cywilny. Nauka - Kodyfikacja - Praktyka. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana Profesorowi Feliksowi Zedlerowi (pp. 1225-1261). Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Bańczerowski, J. (2001). The Linguistic Legacy of Ludwik Zabrocki. In St. Puppel (Ed.), The Ludwik Zabrocki Memorial Lecture (pp. 9-49). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Berk-Seligson, S. (1999). The impact of court interpreting on the coerciveness of leading questions. In International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, vol. 6, No. 1(1999).
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Cao, D. (2007). Translating Law. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Cheshire, J. (Ed.). (1994). English around the World. Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Crystal, D. (1985). How Many Millions? The Statistics of English Today. English Today 1, pp. 7-11.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Delisle J. et al. (Eds.) (1999). Translation Terminology. Amsterdam/Philadephia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Galdia, M. (2009). Legal Linguistics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Publishing House.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Goddard, Ch. (2009). Where Legal Cultures Meet: Translating Confrontation into Coexistence. Investigationes Linguisticae vol. XVII, 168-205.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Jackob, J. I. H. (1995). Atkin’s Encyclopaedia of Court Forms in Civil Proceedings. Volume 10. Companies - Winding-up. London: Butterworths.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Jakubecki, A., Zedler, F. (2003). Prawo upadłościowe i naprawcze. Komenatrze Zakamycza. Krakow: Zakamycze.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Jopek-Bosiacka, A. (2010). Legal Communication: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Warsaw: Warsaw University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Keay, A., Walton, P. (2003). Insolvency Law: Corporate and Personal. London: Pearson Education Limited.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Kielar, B. Z. (1996). Na manowcach tłumaczenia tekstu prawnego: prawdopodo- bieństwo wywołania szoku kulturowego. In F. Grucza & K. Chomicz-Jung (Eds.), Problemy komunikacji interkulturowej. Jedna Europa - wiele językow i wiele kultur (pp. 135-141).Warszawa:Wydawnictwo UniwersytetuWarsza- wskiego.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Kierzkowska, D. (2002). Tłumaczenie prawnicze. Warszawa:Wydawnictwo TEPIS.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Kierzkowska, D. (Ed.) (2011). Kodeks Tłumacza Przysięgłego z komentarzem. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Translegis.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Kubacki, A. D. (2012). Tłumaczenie poświadczone. Status, kształcenie, warsztat i odpowiedzialność tłumacza przysięgłego. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Busi- ness.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Kubacki, A. D. (2013). Teksty paralelne jako narzędzie pomocnicze przy sporzą- dzaniu tłumaczeń specjalistycznych. Comparative Legilinguistics 20013/13, 137-148.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Marsh, D. (2004). Bankruptcy, Insolvency and the Law. A Comprehensive Guide to All Aspects of Bankruptcy and Insolvency. Revised Edition. Brighton: Easyway Guides. Mattila, H. (2006). Comparative Legal Linguistics. England: Ashgate.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Matulewska, A. (2007). Lingua Legis in Translation. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang Publishing House.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Matulewska, A. (2013a). Legilinguistic Translatology. A Parametric Approach to Legal Translation. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang Publishing House.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Matulewska, A. (2013b). Polska terminologia prawa upadłościowego w kontekście. Przekład terminu zarządca na język angielski. Comparative Legilinguistics 20013/13, pp. 149-162.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Neubert, A. (1996). Textlinguistics of Translation: The Textual Approach to Trans- lation. In R. M. Gaddis (Ed.), Translation Horizons Beyond the Boundaries of Translation Spectrum. Translation Perspectives IX (pp. 87-105). Bing- hamton: Center for Research in Translation.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Newmark, P. (1982). Approaches to Translation. Oxford: Pergamon Press Ltd.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Newmark, P. (1988). A Textbook of Translation. UK: Prentice Hall International Ltd.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Newmark, P. (1991). About Translation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Rajak, H. (1991). Insolvency Law. Theory and Practice. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Rayar, L. (1992). Translating Law: Method or Madness? In J. Miler (Ed.), Interna- tional Forum of Legal Translation 1992. Proceedings (pp. 62-71).Warszawa: Wydawnictwo TEPIS.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Roald J. & Whittaker S. (2010). Verbalization in French and Norwegian Legislative Texts: A Contrastive Case Study. In M. Gotti & Ch. Williams (Eds.), Legal Discourse Across Languages and Cultures. Linguistic Insights 117 (pp. 95-107). Bern: Peter Lang.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Saracević, S. ( 2000). New Approach to Legal Translation. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Smith, S. A. (1995). Culture Clash: Anglo-American Case Law and German Civil Law in Translation. In M. Morris (Ed.), Translation and the Law (pp. 181-197). American Translators Association Scholarly Monograph Se- ries, vol. VIII, 1995. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Tolmie, F. (1998). Introduction to Corporate and Personal Insolvency Law. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Vermeer, H. J. (2001). Skopos and Commission in Translational Action. In L. Venuti & M. Baker (Eds.), The Translation Studies Reader (pp. 221-232). London, New York: Routlege.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Vinay, J. P. & Darbelnet J. (1966). Stylistique compar´ee du fran，cais et de l’anglais. Paris: Didier.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Winter, R. J. (2012). What did he say? Mistranslations in the court. In: Judicial Notebook. Retrieved July 2013 from http://www.apa.org/monitor/2012/03/jn.aspx.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Zabrocki, L. (1963). Wspolnoty komunikatywne w genezie i rozwoju języka nie- mieckiego. Część I. Prehistoria języka niemieckiego. Wrocław, Warszawa, Krakow: Zakład Narodowy imienia Ossolińskich Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Zedler, F. (2004). Prawo upadłościowe i naprawcze w zarysie. Krakow: Zakamycze.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Translations of the Polish Act into English
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Bińkowska, M., Niemirska-Fido K. & Walawender R. A. (2010). The Bankruptcy and Reorganisation Law. Prawo upadłościowe i naprawcze. Warszawa: C. H. Beck.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Kierzkowska, D. (Ed.) (1996). Polish Law Collection. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo TEPIS with subsequent supplements.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Świerk-Bożek, K. (2003). Law on Bankrutcy and Rehabilitation. Prawo upadłościo- we i naprawcze. Krakow: Zakamycze.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Source texts Rozporządzenie Rady (WE) nr 1346/2000 z dnia 29 maja 2000 r. w sprawie postępowania upadłościowego. Retrieved June 2013 from Eur-Lex http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2000:160:0001:0018:pl:PDF.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Insolvency Act 1986. Retrieved June 2013 from HMS government website: http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/insolvencyprofessionandlegislation/legislation/uk/insolvencyact.pd.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. The European Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 on insolvency proceedings. Retrieved June 2013 from Eur-Lex http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2000:160:0001:0018:en:PDF.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Ustawa z dnia 28 lutego 2003. Prawo upadłościowe i naprawcze. Retrieved June 2013 from the website of Kancelaria Sejmu http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/Details Servlet?id=WDU20030600535.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Ustawa z dnia 15 września 2000 r. Kodeks społek handlowych [Polish Code of Com- mercial Partnerships and Companies]. Retrieved June 2013 from the web- site of Kancelaria Sejmu http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/DetailsServlet?id=WDU20000941037.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2014-0038 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 (formerly 0860-150X) | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 167 - 188
Published on: Nov 5, 2014
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
axiomatisation,
parametrisation,
insolvency terminology,
source and target language terms
Related subjects:
Philosophy,
Philosophy, other

© 2014 Aleksandra Matulewska, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 38 (2014): Issue 1 (September 2014)
Previous article
Next article