Preface: From Pragmatics and Dialectics to Argument Studies

Budzynska, Katarzyna; Eemeren, Frans H. van; Koszowy, Marcin

doi:10.2478/slgr-2014-0014

Abstract

Pragmatics and dialectics are two disciplines which have been amongst the first and most important partners for argument studies in the exploration of the complex realm of communication. Treating argumentation as a construct consisting of premises and conclusion allows for investigating some interesting properties of the phenomenon of reasoning, but does not capture a variety of aspects related to the usage of natural language and dialogical context in which real-life argumentation is typically embedded. This special issue explores some of the fascinating research questions which emerge when we move beyond logic into the territory of the pragmatics and dialectics of argument.

References

Ajdukiewicz, K. (1974). Pragmatic Logic [trans. O. Wojtasiewicz]. Dordrecht/Bos- ton/Warsaw: D. Reidel Publishing Company & PWN - Polish Scientific Publishers.10.1007/978-94-010-2109-8
Search in Google Scholar
Bocheński, J.M. (1994). Sto zabobonow (One Hundred Superstitions). Krakow: Philed.
Search in Google Scholar
Budzynska, K. (2013). Circularity in Ethotic Structures. Synthese 190(15), 3185-3207 (first published in 2012 under Open Access: DOI 10.1007/s11229-012-0135-6).
Search in Google Scholar
Budzynska, K., Araszkiewicz, M., Bogołębska, B., Cap, P., Ciecierski, T., Debow- ska-Kozlowska, K., Dunin-Kęplicz, B., Dziubiński, M., Federowicz, M., Go- molińska, A., Grabowski, A., Hołowka, T., Jochemczyk, Ł., Kacprzak, M., Kawalec, P., Kielar, M., Kisielewicz, A., Koszowy, M., Kublikowski, R., Kulicki, P., Kuzio, A., Lewiński, P., Lichański, J. Z., Malinowski, J., Mar- ciszewski, W., Nieznański, E., Pietrzak, J., Pogonowski, J., Puczyłow- ski, T. A., Rytel, J., Sawicka, A., Selinger, M., Skowron, A., Skulska, J., Smolak, M., Sokoł, M., Sowińska, A., Stalmaszczyk, P., Stawecki, T., Stepa- niuk, J., Strachocka, A., Suchoń,W., Szymanek, K., Tomczyk, J., Trypuz, R., Trzęsicki, K., Urbański, M., Wasilewska-Kamińska, E., Wieczorek, K. A., Witek, M., Wybraniec-Skardowska, U., Yaskorska, O., Załęska, M., Zdanow- ski, K. & Żurek, T. (2014). The Polish School of Argumentation: A Mani- festo. In K. Budzynska & M. Koszowy (Eds.), The Polish School of Argu- mentation, special issue of the journal Argumentation, vol. 3 (in press).
Search in Google Scholar
Budzynska, K. & Dębowska, K. (2010). Dialogues with conflict resolution: goals and effects. In: P. Łupkowski & M. Purver (Eds.), Aspects of Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue. SemDial 2010, 14th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (pp. 59-66), Poznań: Polish Society for Cognitive Science.
Search in Google Scholar
Budzynska, K. & Witek, M. (2014). Non-inferential aspects of ad hominem and ad baculum. In K. Budzynska & M. Koszowy (Eds.), The Polish School of Argumentation, special issue of the journal Argumentation, vol. 3 (in press).10.1007/s10503-014-9322-6
Search in Google Scholar
Cap, P. (2013). Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.232
Search in Google Scholar
Debowska-Kozlowska, K. (2014). Processing topics from the Beneficial Cognitive Model in partially and over-successful persuasion dialogues. In K. Budzynska & M. Koszowy (Eds.), The Polish School of Argumentation, special issue of the journal Argumentation, vol. 3 (in press). Dunin-Kęplicz, B., Strachocka, A., Szałas, A., & Verbrugge, R. (2012). A para- consistent approach to speech acts. In Proceedings of ArgMAS 2012 (9th In- ternational Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-agent Systems) (pp. 59-78), Valencia.
Search in Google Scholar
Dunin-Kęplicz, B. & Strachocka, A. (2013). Perceiving rules under incomplete and inconsistent information. Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems, Lec- ture Notes in Computer Science, 8143, 256-272.10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9_16
Search in Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van (2010). Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Ex- tending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam/Phila- delphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/aic.2
Search in Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van, Garssen, B., Krabbe, E. C. W., Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., Verheij, B. & J. H. M. Wagemans (2014). Handbook of argumentation theory. A comprehensive overview of the state of the art. Dordrecht etc.: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-9473-5
Search in Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van, Garssen, B. & Meuffels, B. (2009). Fallacies and judgments of reasonableness. Empirical research concerning the pragma-dialectical dis- cussion rules. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-2614-9
Search in Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van & Grootendorst, R. (1984). Speech acts in argumentative dis- cussions. A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Dordrecht: Foris & Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110846089
Search in Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, communication, and fallacies. A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erl- baum.
Search in Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumen- tation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van, Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S. & Jacobs, S. (1993). Recon- structing argumentative discourse. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
Search in Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van, Houtlosser, P. & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2007). Argumenta- tive indicators in discourse. A pragma-dialectical study. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6244-5
Search in Google Scholar
Grabowski, A. (2003). Sonderfallthese - its critique and interpretation. Rechts- theorie, 34, 371-392.
Search in Google Scholar
Griffin, N. (2013). Commentary on M. Koszowy’s “Polish Logical Studies from an Informal Logic Perspective”. In D. Mohammed & M. Lewiński (Eds.), Virtues of Argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA) 22-26 May 2013 (pp. 1-5), Windsor, ON: OSSA.
Search in Google Scholar
Groarke, L. (2011). Informal logic. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Win- ter 2003 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-informal/.
Search in Google Scholar
Hamblin, C. L. (1970). Fallacies. London: Methuen. Hitchcock, D. (2006). Informal logic and the concept of argument. In: D. Jacquette (Ed.), Philosophy of Logic (pp. 101-129). Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, vol. 5. Amsterdam: Elsevier. http://link.springer.com/search?facet-author=%22Scott+Jacobs%22
Search in Google Scholar
Hołowka, T. (1998). Błędy, spory, argumenty [Fallacies, disputes, arguments]. Warszawa: Wydział Filozofii i Socjologii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Search in Google Scholar
Jacobs, S. (1989). Speech acts and arguments. Argumentation, 27, 345-365.10.1007/BF00182603
Search in Google Scholar
Jacquette, D. (2006, Ed.). Philosophy of Logic. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, vol. 5. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Search in Google Scholar
Jaśkowski, S. (1948). Rachunek zdań dla systemow dedukcyjnych sprzecznych, Stu- dia Societatis Scientiarun Torunesis, Section A, 1(5), 55-77. (English trans- lation: Propositional Calculus for Contradictory Deductive Systems, Studia Logica, 24 (1969), 143-157).
Search in Google Scholar
Jaśkowski, S. (1949). O koniunkcji dyskusyjnej w rachunku zdań dla systemow dedukcyjnych sprzecznych”. Studia Societatis Scientiarum Torunesis, Sec- tion A, 1(8): 171-2. (English translation: On the Discussive Conjunction in the Propositional Calculus for Inconsistent Deductive Systems, Logic and Logical Philosophy, 7 (1999), 57-59.) 10.12775/LLP.1999.004
Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, R. H. (1987). Argumentation as dialectical. Argumentation, 1, 41-56.10.1007/BF00127118
Search in Google Scholar
Kacprzak, M. & Yaskorska, O. (2014). Dialogue protocols for formal fallacies. In K. Budzynska & M. Koszowy (Eds.), The Polish School of Argumentation, special issue of the journal Argumentation, vol. 3 (in press).10.1007/s10503-014-9324-4
Search in Google Scholar
Kacprzak,M., Dziubiński, M. & Budzynska, K. (in review). Strategies in Dialogues: A game-theoretic approach.
Search in Google Scholar
Kawalec, P. (2003). Structural Reliabilism: Inductive Logic as a Theory of Justifi- cation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-010-0259-2
Search in Google Scholar
Kielar, M. (2011). Transitivity as a marker of valuation in journalistic discourse. In K. Debowska-Kozlowska & K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk (Eds.), On Words and Sounds: A Selection of Papers from the 40th PLM (pp. 311-322). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Publishing.
Search in Google Scholar
Kisielewicz, A. (2011). Sztuczna inteligencja i logika [Artificial Intelligence and Logic]. Warszawa: WNT.
Search in Google Scholar
Koszowy, M. (2010). Pragmatic logic and the study of argumentation. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 22 (35), 29-45.
Search in Google Scholar
Koszowy, M. (2013). Polish Logical Studies from an Informal Logic Perspective. In D. Mohammed & M. Lewiński (Eds.), Virtues of Argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22-26 May 2013 (pp. 1-10), Windsor, ON: OSSA (in press).
Search in Google Scholar
Koszowy, M. & Araszkiewicz, M. (2014). Lvov-Warsaw School as a source of inspi- ration for argumentation theory. In K. Budzynska & M. Koszowy (Eds.), The Polish School of Argumentation, special issue of the journal Argumentation, vol. 3 (in press).
Search in Google Scholar
Malinowski, J. (2003). Pragmatic interpretation of utterances. Logic and Logical Philosophy, 11, 115-127.10.12775/LLP.2003.006
Search in Google Scholar
Małuszyński, J. & Szałas, A. (2013). Partiality and Inconsistency in Agents’ Belief Bases. KES-AMSTA, Frontiers of Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 252, 3-17.
Search in Google Scholar
Marciszewski, W. (1994). Sztuka rozumowania w świetle logiki [The art of dis- cussing from the perspective of logic]. Warszawa: Aleph.
Search in Google Scholar
Moeschler, J. (2001). Speech act theory and the analysis of conversation. Sequenc- ing and interpretation in pragmatic theory. In: D. Vandervecken & S. Kubo (Eds.), Essays in Speech Act Theory (pp. 239-261), Amsterdam, John Ben- jamins.
Search in Google Scholar
Nieznański, E. (2010). Sylogizm prawniczy z logicznego punktu widzenia [Legal syllogism from the point of view of logic]. Edukacja prawnicza, 3, 5-16.
Search in Google Scholar
Peczenik, A. (1988). Legal reasoning as a special case of moral reasoning. Ratio Juris, 1, 123-136.10.1111/j.1467-9337.1988.tb00009.x
Search in Google Scholar
H. Prakken (2006). Formal systems for persuasion dialogue. The Knowledge Engi- neering Review, 21, 163-188.10.1017/S0269888906000865
Search in Google Scholar
Puczyłowski, T. (2012). O argumentacji odwołującej się do implikatury kon- wersacyjnej [On argumentation appealing to conversational implicature]. Przegląd Filozoficzny, 3(83), 93-110.
Search in Google Scholar
Reed, C. (2006). Representing Dialogic Argumentation. Knowledge Based Systems, 19(1), 22-31.10.1016/j.knosys.2005.08.002
Search in Google Scholar
Reed, C.A. & Budzynska, K. (2011). How dialogues create arguments. In F. H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen, D. Godden & G. Mitchel (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th conference on argumentation of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 1633-1645), Amsterdam: SicSat.
Search in Google Scholar
Rees, M. A. van (2009). Dissociation in argumentative discussions. A pragma- dialectical perspective. Dordrecht etc.: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-9150-6
Search in Google Scholar
Rytel, J. (2012). Reaching an agreement: Argumentation in preschoolers’ narra- tive discourse. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwerstytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego.
Search in Google Scholar
Selinger, M. (2014). Towards formal representation and evaluation of arguments. In K. Budzynska & M. Koszowy (Eds.), The Polish School of Argumentation, special issue of the journal Argumentation, vol. 3 (in press).10.1007/s10503-014-9325-3
Search in Google Scholar
Simons, P. (2014). Linguistic Complexity and Argumentative Unity: A Lvov- Warsaw School Supplement. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 36(49) (this issue). 10.2478/slgr-2014-0005
Search in Google Scholar
Załęska, M. (2011). Ad hominem in the criticisms of expert argumentation. In F. H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen, D. Godden & G. Mitchel (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th conference on argumentation of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 2047-2057), Amsterdam: SicSat.
Search in Google Scholar
Żurek, T. & Araszkiewicz, M. (2013). Modelling teleological interpretation. In: E. Francesconi & B. Verheij (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2013) (pp. 160-168), New York: ACM.
Search in Google Scholar

Preface: From Pragmatics and Dialectics to Argument Studies

Abstract

Paradigm

My account