Institutional Arrangements in the Absence of Disciplinary Definitions: Digital Humanities in Switzerland

Michael Piotrowski; Max Kemman

doi:10.2478/sjs-2023-0025

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

Institutional Arrangements in the Absence of Disciplinary Definitions: Digital Humanities in Switzerland

Swiss Journal of Sociology

Volume 49 (2023): Issue 3 (November 2023)

By: Michael Piotrowski and Max Kemman

Open Access

|Oct 2023

Abstract

The digitalization of research practices in the humanities has led to the emergence of the field of digital humanities (DH). DH has made significant progress in institutionalization, while remaining underdefined. Through a qualitative study of Swiss universities we explore how institutional structures and definitions of DH interact. We show that underdefinition enables flexibility in institutionalization, while the local contexts that lead to diverse institutional arrangements may necessitate the underdefinition of DH.

References

Bensaude-Vincent, Bernadette. 2016. Building Multidisciplinary Research Fields: The Cases of Materials Science, Nanotechnology and Synthetic Biology. Pp. 45–60 in ˚e Local Configuration of New Research Fields: On Regional and National Diversity, edited by M. Merz and P. Sormani. Cham: Springer.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bunout, Estelle, Maud Ehrmann, and Frédéric Clavert (eds.). 2023. Digitised Newspapers – a New Eldorado for Historians? Reflections on Tools, Methods and Epistemology. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Oldenbourg.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Callaway, Elizabeth, Jeffrey Turner, Heather Stone, and Adam Halstrom. 2020. The Push and Pull of Digital Humanities: Topic Modeling the “What Is Digital Humanities?” Genre. Digital Humanities Quarterly 14(1). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/14/1/000450/000450.html (29.06.2023).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Edmond, Jennifer. 2016. Collaboration and Infrastructure. Pp. 54–65 in A New Companion to Digital Humanities, edited by S. Schreibman, R. Siemens, and J. Unsworth. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Eve, Martin Paul. 2020. Violins in the Subway: Scarcity Correlations, Evaluative Cultures, and Disciplinary Authority in the Digital Humanities. Pp. 105–122 in Digital Technology and the Practices of Humanities Research, edited by J. Edmond. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fraistat, Neil. 2012. The Function of Digital Humanities Centers at the Present Time. Pp. 281–291 in Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by M. K. Gold. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gieryn, Thomas F. 1983. Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. American Sociological Review 48(6): 781–795.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hollingsworth, J Rogers. 2006. A Path-Dependent Perspective on Institutional and Organizational Factors Shaping Major Scientific Discoveries. Pp. 423–442 in Innovation, Science, and Institutional Change, edited by J. Hage and M. Meeus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jacobs, Jerry A. 2013. In Defense of Disciplines: Interdisciplinarity and Specialization in the Research University. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jannidis, Fotis, Hubertus Kohle, and Malte Rehbein (eds.). 2017. Digital Humanities: Eine Einführung. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kemman, Max. 2021. Trading Zones of Digital History. Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kirsch, Adam. 02.05.2014. Technology Is Taking over English Departments. In ˚e New Republic. https://newrepublic.com/article/117428/ (15.04.2020).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kirschenbaum, Matthew G. 2014. “What Is ‘Digital Humanities,’ and Why Are They Saying Such Terrible Things about It?” Differences 25(1): 46–63.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Klein, Julie Thompson. 2013. The State of the Field: Institutionalization of Interdisciplinarity. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies (31): 66–74.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Klein, Julie Thompson. 2015. Interdisciplining Digital Humanities: Boundary Work in an Emerging Field. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Krishnan, Armin. 2009. What Are Academic Disciplines? Some Observations on the Disciplinarity Vs. Interdisciplinarity Debate. NCRM Working Paper. Southampton: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lässig, Simone. 2021. Digital History: Challenges and Opportunities for the Profession. Geschichte und Gesellschaft 47(1): 5–34.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Li Vigni, Fabrizio. 2021. Complexity Sciences: A Scientific Platform. Science & Technology Studies 34(4): 30–55.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liu, Alan. 2012. Where Is Cultural Criticism in the Digital Humanities? Pp. 490-510 in Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by M. K. Gold. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Luhmann, Jan, and Manuel Burghardt. 2021. Digital Humanities – A Discipline in Its Own Right? An Analysis of the Role and Position of Digital Humanities in the Academic Landscape. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 73(2): 148–171.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McCarty, Willard. 2012. The Residue of Uniqueness. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung 37(3): 24–45.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McCarty, Willard. 2014. Humanities Computing. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Merz, Martina, and Philippe Sormani (eds.). 2016. ˚e Local Configuration of New Research Fields: On Regional and National Diversity. Cham: Springer.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Moles, Abraham A. 1995. Les sciences de l’imprécis. Paris: Seuil.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Oberbichler, Sarah, Emanuela Boroş, Antoine Doucet, Jani Marjanen, Eva Pfanzelter, Juha Rautiainen, Hannu Toivonen, and Mikko Tolonen. 2021. Integrated Interdisciplinary Workflows for Research on Historical Newspapers: Perspectives from Humanities Scholars, Computer Scientists, and Librarians. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 73(2): 225–239.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pidd, Michael. 2022. Building Digital Humanities Centers. Pp. 305–315 in ˚e Bloomsbury Handbook to the Digital Humanities, edited by J. O’Sullivan. Bloomsbury: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Piotrowski, Michael. 2018. Digital Humanities: An Explication. In Proceedings of INF-DH 2018, edited by M. Burghardt and C. Müller-Birn. Berlin: Gesellschaft für Informatik.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Piotrowski, Michael, and Mateusz Fafinski. 2020. Nothing New Under the Sun? Computational Humanities and the Methodology of History. Pp. 171–181 in CHR2020: Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Humanities Research, edited by F. Karsdorp, B. McGillivray, A. Nerghes, and M. Wevers. CEUR Workshop Proceedings.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ramsay, Stephen. 2013. Who’s in and Who’s Out. Pp. 239–241 in Defining Digital Humanities, edited by M. Terras, J. Nyhan, and E. Vanhoutte. Farnham: Ashgate.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Saner, Philippe. 2019. Envisioning Higher Education: How Imagining the Future Shapes the Implementation of a New Field in Higher Education. Swiss Journal of Sociology 45(3): 359–381.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schreibman, Susan, Ray Siemens, and John Unsworth (eds.). 2004. A Companion to Digital Humanities. Oxford: Blackwell.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Small, Mario L. 1999. Departmental Conditions and the Emergence of New Disciplines: Two Cases in the Legitimation of African-American Studies. ˚eory and Society 28(5): 659–707.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sugimoto, Cassidy R., and Scott Weingart. 2015. The Kaleidoscope of Disciplinarity. Journal of Documentation 71(4): 775–794.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Svensson, Patrik. 2011. The Digital Humanities as a Humanities Project. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 11(1–2): 42–60.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Terras, Melissa. 2006. Disciplined: Using Educational Studies to Analyse “Humanities Computing”. Literary and Linguistic Computing 21(2): 229–246.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Terras, Melissa, Julianne Nyhan, and Edward Vanhoutte (eds.). 2013. Defining Digital Humanities. Farnham: Ashgate.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van Hooland, Seth, Florence Gillet, Simon Hengchen, and Max De Wilde. 2016. Introduction aux humanités numériques : méthodes et pratiques. Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck Supérieur.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Warwick, Claire. 2012. Institutional Models for Digital Humanities. Pp. 193–216 in Digital Humanities in Practice, edited by C. Warwick, M. Terras, and J. Nyhan. London: Facet.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article