Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Cultural Adaptation of Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) Patient and Primary Care Practice Questionnaires to the Slovenian Context Cover

Cultural Adaptation of Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) Patient and Primary Care Practice Questionnaires to the Slovenian Context

Open Access
|Feb 2025

References

  1. Klootwijk A, Bakx P, Franx A, Bijma H, Ernst-Smelt H, Lamain-de Ruiter M, et al. Patient-reported outcome and experience measures for quality improvement in pregnancy and childbirth care: A retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open Qual. 2023;12(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001922.
  2. OECD. PaRIS Patient Questionnaire (PaRIS-PQ) [Internet]. Paris: OECD; 2024. [cited 2024 July 22]. Available from: https://www.oecd. org/content/dam/oecd/en/about/programmes/patient-reported-indicator-surveys/PaRIS%20patient%20questionnaire.pdf/_jcr_ content/renditions/original./PaRIS%20patient%20questionnaire.pdf
  3. Bloemeke-Cammin J, Groene O, Ballester M, Guanais F, Groenewegen P, Kendir C, et al. International cross-cultural development and field testing of the primary care practice questionnaire for the PaRIS survey (PaRIS-PCPQ). BMC Prim Care. 2024;25(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02375-8.
  4. Collins D. Cognitive interviewing practice [Internet]. London; 2015. [cited 2024 July 22]. Available from: https://methods.sagepub.com/book/cognitive-interviewing-practice
  5. de Boer D, van den Berg M, Ballester M, Bloemeke J, Boerma W, de Bienassis K, et al. Assessing the outcomes and experiences of care from the perspective of people living with chronic conditions, to support countries in developing people-centred policies and practices: Study protocol of the International Survey of People Living with Chronic Conditions (PaRIS survey). BMJ Open. 2022;12(9):e061424. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061424.
  6. Ambrož M, Kendir C, Boerma W, Klemenc-Ketiš Z. Patient Reported Indicator Surveys (Paris): Methodological considerations of a field trial in Slovenia. Zdr Varst. 2024;63(1):30-37. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2024-0005.
  7. Poplas Susic A, Svab I, Klemenc Ketis Z. Upgrading the model of care in family medicine: A Slovenian example. Public Health Panorama. 2018;4(3):550-555.
  8. Mohler P, Dorer B, De Jong J, Hu M. Translation guidelines for best practice in cross-cultural surveys. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan; 2016.
  9. Godfrey K. OmegaT [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2024 July 27]. Available from: https://omegat.org/
  10. Fitzgerald R, Widdop S, Gray M, Collins D. Identifying sources of error in cross-national questionnaires: Application of an error source typology to cognitive interview data. J Off Stat. 2011;27:569-599.
  11. Oosterveld P, Vorst HCM, Smits N. Methods for questionnaire design: A taxonomy linking procedures to test goals. Qual Life Res. 2019;28(9):2501-2512. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02209-6.
  12. Willis G. Cognitive interviewing in survey design: State of the science and future directions. In: Vannette DL, Krosnick JA, editors. The Palgrave handbook of survey research. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 103-107.
  13. Willis GB. The practice of cross-cultural cognitive interviewing. J Public Opin Q. 2015;79(S1):359-395. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfu092.
  14. Svedbo Engström M, Leksell J, Johansson UB, Eeg-Olofsson K, Borg S, Palaszewski B, et al. A disease-specific questionnaire for measuring patient-reported outcomes and experiences in the Swedish National Diabetes Register: Development and evaluation of content validity, face validity, and test-retest reliability. Patient Educ Couns. 2018;101(1):139-146. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.07.016.
  15. Lunt LE, Shoop-Worrall S, Smith N, Cleary G, McDonagh J, Smith AD, et al. Validation of novel patient-centred juvenile idiopathic arthritis-specific patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROMs/PREMs). Ped Rheumat Online J. 2020;18(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12969-020-00481-2.
  16. Balza JS, Cusatis R, McDonnell SM, Basir MA, Flynn KE. Effective questionnaire design: How to use cognitive interviews to refine questionnaire items. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2022;15(2):345-349. doi: 10.3233/npm-210848.
  17. Willis G. Pretesting of health survey questionnaires: Cognitive interviewing, usability testing, and behavior coding. In: Johnson TP, editor. Health survey methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2015. p. 217-242. doi: 10.1002/9781118594629.ch9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2025-0012 | Journal eISSN: 1854-2476 | Journal ISSN: 0351-0026
Language: English
Page range: 93 - 102
Submitted on: Oct 21, 2024
|
Accepted on: Dec 27, 2024
|
Published on: Feb 28, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Matija AMBROŽ, Nina ROPRET, Pia VRAČKO, Eva MURKO, Candan KENDIR, Lucija BOSNJAK, Rachel WILLIAMS, Zalika KLEMENC-KETIŠ, published by National Institute of Public Health, Slovenia
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.