Reliability, Validity and Responsiveness of the Slovenian Version of the Patient Evaluation Measure (PEM-Slo) in Patients with Wrist and Hand Disorders

BOJNEC, Vida; LONZARIĆ, Dragan; KLARER REBEC, Živa

doi:10.2478/sjph-2023-0028

References

Alderman AK, Chung KC. Measuring outcomes in hand surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 2008;35(2):239–250. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2007.10.001.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Macey AC, Burke FD, Abbott K, Barton NJ, Bradbury E, Bradley A, et al. Outcomes of hand surgery. J Hand Surg Br. 1995 Dec 29;20(6):841–855. doi: 10.1016/s0266-7681(95)80059-x.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Dec;81:15–20. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.20619.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-3191. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737–745. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hobby JL, Watts C, Elliot D. Validity and responsiveness of the Patient Evaluation Measure as an outcome measure for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Br. 2005 Aug;30(4):350–354. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2005.03.009.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zyluk A, Piotuch B. A comparison of DASH, PEM and levine questionnaires in outcome measurement of carpal tunnel release. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2011;43(3):162–166. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1273686.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Forward DP, Sithole JS, Davis TRC. The internal consistency and validity of the patient evaluation measure for outcomes assessment in distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Eur. 2007;32(3):262–267. doi: 10.1016/J.JHSB.2007.01.010.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dias JJ, Bhowal B, Wildin CJ, Thompson JR. Assessing the outcome of disorders of the hand. Is the patient evaluation measure reliable, valid, responsive and without bias? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83(2):235–240. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.83b2.10838.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dias JJ, Rajan RA, Thompson JR. Which questionnaire is best? The reliability, validity and ease of use of the patient evaluation measure, the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand and the Michigan hand outcome measure. J Hand Surg Eur. 2008;33(1):9–17. doi: 10.1177/1753193407087121.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sharma R, Dias JJ. Validity and reliability of three generic outcome measures for hand disorders. J Hand Surg Br. 2000;25 B(6):593–600. doi: 10.1054/jhsb.2000.0398.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C, Beaton D, Cole D, Davis A, et al. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and head). Am J Ind Med. 1996 Jun;29(6):602–608. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<;602::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-L.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Novak E, Lavrić M, Semprimožnik K. Institute for Work and Health [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2021 Jul 4]. Slovene DASH. Available from: https://dash.iwh.on.ca/sites/dash/public/translations/DASH_Slovene.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Devlin NJ, Brooks R. EQ-5D and the EuroQol Group: Past, present and future. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Apr 13;15(2):127–137. doi: 10.1007/s40258-017-0310-5.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Prevolnik Rupel V, Ogorevc M. Crosswalk EQ-5D-5L value set for Slovenia. Zdr Varst. 2020 Sep;59(3):189–194. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2020-0024.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G. Global rating of change scales: A review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):163-170. doi: 10.1179/jmt.2009.17.3.163.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van Der Roer N, Ostelo RWJG, Bekkering GE, Van Tulder MW, De Vet HCW. Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity, functional status, and general health status in patients with nonspecific low back pain. Spine. 2006 Mar 1;31(5):578-582. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000201293.57439.47.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, Weber K, Dowe M, Rogers S. Grip and pinch strength: Normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985;66(2):69–74.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RWJG, Bouter LM, De Vet HCW. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: A scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012 May;21(4):651-657. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, van der Windt DAWM, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL. Measurement in medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. 91, 243 p.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hinkle DE, Wiersma W, Jurs SG. Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences. 2nd Ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1988.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Beaton DE, Hogg-Johnson S, Bombardier C. Evaluating changes in health status: Reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Jan;50(1):79-93. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00296-x.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd Ed. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988. 24–26 p.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kumar R, Indrayan A. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for medical researchers. Indian Pediatr. 2011 Apr;48(4):277-287. doi: 10.1007/s13312-011-0055-4.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med. 1978 Oct;8(4):283-298. doi: 10.1016/s0001-2998(78)80014-2.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Turner D, Schünemann HJ, Griffith LE, Beaton DE, Griffiths AM, Critch JN, et al. The minimal detectable change cannot reliably replace the minimal important difference. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jan;63(1):28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.01.024.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MCID for the patient evaluation measure as a patient rated outcome measure for Dupuytren’s contracture. In: Dias J, Sayeeed L, Bhowal B, editors. The British Society for Surgery of the Hand, Autumn Scientific Meeting [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2021 Jul 4]. Available from: https://www.bssh.ac.uk/_userfiles/pages/files/professionals/A%202015%20Programme%20Final.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Terwee CB, Roorda LD, Dekker J, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Peat G, Jordan KP, et al. Mind the MIC: Large variation among populations and methods. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):524-534. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.010.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MacDermid JC, Turgeon T, Richards RS, Beadle M, Roth JH. Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: A reliable and valid measurement tool. J Orthop Trauma. 1998 Nov;12(8):577–586. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199811000-00009.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pinder EM, Chee KG, Hayton M, Murali SR, Talwalkar SC, Trail IA. Survivorship of revision wrist replacement. J Wrist Surg. 2018 Feb;7(1):18-23. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1603320.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lane JCE, Rodrigues JN, Furniss D, Burn E, Poulter R, Gardiner MD. Basal thumb osteoarthritis surgery improves health state utility irrespective of technique: A study of UK Hand Registry data. J Hand Surg Eur. 2020 Jun;45(5):436-442. doi: 10.1177/1753193420909753.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Anthoine E, Moret L, Regnault A, Sbille V, Hardouin JB. Sample size used to validate a scale: A review of publications on newly-developed patient reported outcomes measures. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Dec 9;12:176. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0176-2.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bacchetti P. Current sample size conventions: Flaws, harms, and alternatives. BMC Med. 2010 Mar 22;8:17. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-17.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jesenšek Papež B, Šošić L, Bojnec V. The consequences of COVID-19 outbreak on outpatient rehabilitation services: A single-center experience in Slovenia. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021 Jun;57(3):451-457. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06678-8.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Reliability, Validity and Responsiveness of the Slovenian Version of the Patient Evaluation Measure (PEM-Slo) in Patients with Wrist and Hand Disorders

References

Paradigm

My account