Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Remote consultations in general practice – A systematic review Cover

Remote consultations in general practice – A systematic review

By: Staša Vodička and  Erika Zelko  
Open Access
|Sep 2022

References

  1. Mohammadzadeh N, Rezayi S, Tanhapour M, Saeedi S. Telecardiology interventions for patients with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review on characteristics and effects. Int J Med Inform. 2021;11(158):104663. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104663.
  2. Molinari G, Molinari M, Di Biase M, Brunetti ND. Telecardiology and its settings of application: an update. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(5):373–81. doi: 10.1177/1357633X16689432.
  3. Benschoter RA, Eaton MT, Smith P. Use of videotape to provide individual instruction in techniques of psychotherapy. J Med Educ. 1965;40(12):1159-61. doi: 10.1097/00001888-196512000-00006.
  4. Wilson LS, Maeder AJ. Recent directions in telemedicine: review of trends in research and practice. Healthcare Inform Res 2015;21(4):213. doi: 10.4258/hir.2015.21.4.213.
  5. Vodička S, Naji HF, Zelko E. The role of telecardiology in dealing with patients with cardiac rhythm disorders in family medicine - systematic review. Zdr Varst. 2020;59(2):108-16. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2020-0014.
  6. Paterson C, Bacon R, Dwyer R, Morrison KS, Toohey K, O’Dea A, et al. The role of telehealth during the Covid-19 pandemic across the interdisciplinary cancer team: implications for practice. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2020;36(6):151090. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2020.151090.
  7. Green MA, McKee M, Katikireddi SV. Remote general practitioner consultations during COVID-19. Lancet Digit Health. 2022;4(1):7. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00279-X.
  8. Smith K, Brooks W, Challiner J, Povey E. Quality assurance of remote clinical assessments in the NHS. Lancet. 2021;27(398.10315):1962. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02328-X.
  9. Crane SJ, Ganesh R, Post JA, Jacobson NA. Telemedicine consultations and follow-up of patients with Covid-19. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020;95(9S):S33-4. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.06.051.
  10. Brørs G, Norman C.D, Norekvål T.M. Accelerated importance of eHealth literacy in the Covid-19 outbreak and beyond. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020;19:458–61. doi: 10.1177/1474515120941307.
  11. Halwas N, Griebel L, Huebner J. eHealth literacy, Internet and eHealth service usage: a survey among cancer patients and their relatives. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017;143:2291–9. doi: 10.1007/s00432-017-2475-6.
  12. Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHealth literacy: essential skills for consumer health in a networked world. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8:9. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.2.e9.
  13. Taggar J, Saha R, Hopwood-Carr P, Patel B, Johnson C. Clinical placements in general practice: concepts and considerations of implementing remote virtual placements in the COVID world. Educ Prim Care. 2021;32(4):237-44. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2021.1907790.
  14. Howgego G, Sharma I, Kalu P. The rules for online clinical engagement in the Covid era. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020;73(12):2127-35. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.08.045.
  15. Banks J, Farr M, Salisbury C, Bernard E, Northstone K, Edwards H, et al. Use of an electronic consultation system in primary care: a qualitative interview study. Br J Gen Pract. 2018;68(666):1-8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X693509.
  16. Atherton H, Brant H, Ziebland S, Bikker A, Campbell J, Gibson A, et al. Alternatives to the face-to-face consultation in general practice: focused ethnographic case study. Br J Gen Pract. 2018;68(669):293300. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X694853.
  17. Newbould J, Exley J, Ball S, Corbett J, Pitchforth E, Roland M. GPs’ and practice staff’s views of a telephone first approach to demand management: a qualitative study in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2019;69(682):321-8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X702401.
  18. Randhawa RS, Chandan JS, Thomas T, Singh S. An exploration of the attitudes and views of general practitioners on the use of video consultations in a primary healthcare setting: a qualitative pilot study. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2019;20:5. doi: 10.1017/S1463423618000361.
  19. Cowie J, Calveley E, Bowers G, Bowers J. Evaluation of a digital consultation and self-care advice tool in primary care: a multi-methods study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(5):896. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050896.
  20. Zanaboni P, Fagerlund AJ. Patients’ use and experiences with e-consultation and other digital health services with their general practitioner in Norway: results from an online survey. BMJ Open. 2020;10(6):034773. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034773.
  21. López Seguí F, Vidal-Alaball J, Sagarra Castro M, García-Altés A, García Cuyàs F. General practitioners’ perceptions of whether teleconsultations reduce the number of face-to-face visits in the Catalan public primary care system: retrospective cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(3):14478. doi: 10.2196/14478.
  22. Sharma SC, Sharma S, Thakker A, Sharma G, Roshan M, Varakantam V. Revolution in UK general practice due to Covid-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey. Cureus. 2020;12(8):9573. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9573.
  23. Morreel S, Philips H, Verhoeven V. Organisation and characteristics of out-of-hours primary care during a COVID-19 outbreak: a real-time observational study. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):0237629. doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0237629.
  24. Murphy M, Scott LJ, Salisbury C, Turner A, Scott A, Denholm R, et al. Implementation of remote consulting in UK primary care following the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods longitudinal study. Br J General Practice. 2021;71(704):166-7. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2020.0948.
  25. Anderson J, Walsh J, Anderson M, Burnley R. Patient satisfaction with remote consultations in a primary care setting. Cureus. 2021;13(9):17814. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17814.
  26. Mathew T, Lee PC, Ianno DJ, Benson J. Telehealth and Australian general practice in 2020: a survey exploring patients’ perspectives in the Adelaide Hills. Aust J Gen Pract. 2021;50(10):754-9. doi: 10.31128/ AJGP-11-20-5727.
  27. Lackey S, Schmidtke KA, Vlaev I. A mixed-methods study describing behavioral factors that influenced general practitioners’ experiences using triage during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Fam Pract. 2021;22(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01469-x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2022-0030 | Journal eISSN: 1854-2476 | Journal ISSN: 0351-0026
Language: English
Page range: 224 - 230
Submitted on: May 4, 2022
|
Accepted on: Sep 5, 2022
|
Published on: Sep 28, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Staša Vodička, Erika Zelko, published by National Institute of Public Health, Slovenia
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.