Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Remote consultations in general practice – A systematic review Cover

Remote consultations in general practice – A systematic review

By: Staša Vodička and  Erika Zelko  
Open Access
|Sep 2022

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Flow diagram of the literature search and study selection.
Flow diagram of the literature search and study selection.

General characteristics of the included studies_

Study Year of publicationCountryStudy designStudy topicSample sizeParticipantsDurationType of serviceMain outcomesLimitationCovid-19 related
Banks 2017 (15)UKQualitative interview studyUsage of electronic consultation system23 GPsGPs and other health workers15 months in 2016• E-consultations (by mail) • Physical consultatiThe technology did not justify the financial investment.Evaluation of only one e-systemNo
Atheron 2017 (16)UKCase studyWhat are the alternatives to physical consultation?45 staff members in GPs’ officeother health workers and patients10 months in 2015 and 2016• Telephone calls • Video calls • MailImplementing alternatives to physical consultation should be moderate and gradual.One specific ethnic group was includedNo
Newbould 2018 (17)UKQualitative studyTo identify enablers and barriers to adopting a telephone first approachSemi- structured interview 53 GPsGPs6 months in 2018• Telephone first approachApproach is an improvement of previous system.Only included staff who believe in this approachNo
Randhawa 2018 (18)UKQualitative pilot studyViews of GPs on video consultationsSemi- structured interview 12 GPsGPs1 month in 2014• Video consultationsVideo consultations can be useful, practical.Success of service depends on availability and quality of technologyNo
Cowie 2018 (19)UKA multi- methods studyEvaluation of digital consultations11 GPsGPs4 months in 2017• eConsult (web-based triage and consultation system)GPs had high satisfaction, improves quality of care.Short time, low number of participantsNo
Zanaboni 2020 (20)NorwayOnline surveyUse and experience with e-consultation2,043 patientspatients14 days in 2017• E-consultations (by mail)One of the first countries that implemented e-consultation, it improves the quality of care.Online survey was used by patients who have computer knowledge, not applicable for the whole populationNo
López Seguí 2020 (21)SpainRetro- spective cross-sectional studyCan teleconsultations reduce the number of visits?3,559 messages for 2,268 teleconsultationsGPs4 months in 2018• eConsulta (by mail)Teleconsultations can reduce the number of visits.No systemized approach, only a few GP were includedNo
Sharma 2020 (22)UKCross- sectional studySatisfaction of patients with remote consultations95 GPsGPs and other health workers1 month in 2020• Telephone calls • Video calls • Mail • Physical consultationThe implementation of remote consultation requires good financial support for the IT infrastructure.Small sampleYes
Morreel 2020 (23)BelgiumReal-time observational studyOrganizations and characteristics of primary care21 GPs 15,655 consultationsGPs5 weekends in 2019• Home visits • Telephone- • Physical consultationGPs changed their way of working rapidly, almost immediately.Safety problemsYes
Murphy 2021 (24)UKA mix- methods longitudinal studyImpact of rapid implementation of remote consultations in pandemic of Covid-1987 GPsGPs and other health workers4 months in 2020 compared to 2019• Telephone calls • Video calls • MailRemote consultation is necessary.Patients were not interviewedYes
Andreson 2021 (25)UKSatisfaction measurement using a four-step questionnaireSatisfaction of patients with remote consultations104 patientspatients3 separate days in 2021• Telephone calls • Video callsRemote consultations are effective complement to physical consultation.Online survey was used by patients who have computer knowledge, not applicable for the whole populationNo
Mathew 2021 (26)AustraliaOnline surveyWhat kind of telehealth tool is the most acceptable for patients?154 patientspatients2 months in 2020• Telephone calls • Video callsThe perception of telephone consultation is strongly positive.Study performed on a local levelNo

Search strategy for each database_

DatabaseSearch StrategyResult all (free)
PubMed“Remote Consultation”[Mesh] AND (“General Practitioners”[Mesh] OR “Family Medicine” [Mesh] OR “Primary care” [Mesh])42 (23)
ScopusTITLE-ABS-KEY “Remote Consultation” AND (“General Practitioners” OR “Family Medicine” OR “Primary care”)611 (431)
Web of ScienceTS=(remote consultation)) AND TS=(general practice)73 (47)
IEEE library(“All Metadata”:“Remote Consultation))”) AND (“All Metadata”: “General Practice ” OR “Family Medicine” OR “Primary care”))2 (0)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2022-0030 | Journal eISSN: 1854-2476 | Journal ISSN: 0351-0026
Language: English
Page range: 224 - 230
Submitted on: May 4, 2022
Accepted on: Sep 5, 2022
Published on: Sep 28, 2022
Published by: National Institute of Public Health, Slovenia
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Staša Vodička, Erika Zelko, published by National Institute of Public Health, Slovenia
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.